SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Experiment Design
Soil Science Society of America Journal 67:1266-1271 (2003)
© 2003 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-7—FOREST & RANGE SOILS & SOIL & PLANT ANALYSIS

Automated Monitoring of Soil Respiration

A Moving Chamber Design

Nelson T. Edwards* and Jeffery S. Riggs

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6422

* Corresponding author (nte{at}ornl.gov)

We designed, constructed, and tested an automated chamber system for continuously monitoring soil respiration. Our objective was to design a chamber that would permit monitoring of CO2 efflux rates over long time periods without altering the natural microclimate within the chamber. Furthermore, the design would permit accurate measurements even in a highly fluctuating CO2 environment. We built a chamber that operates by closing over the soil in response to a control signal and remains closed for a 14-min period before opening again. Thus, the chamber allows normal drying and wetting of the soil between measurements. An automated switching system was programmed to sequentially open and close chambers in concert with an infrared gas analysis system (IRGA). The IRGA was operated in a differential mode, and equivalent flow rates of reference gas (ambient air) and sample gas (air exiting chamber) were maintained with mass flow controllers. A flexible neoprene lid, stretched tightly over each chamber when closed, provided an airtight seal. This feature and the use of a large mixing bottle (for buffering frequent changes in ambient CO2 concentration) permitted us to measure soil CO2 efflux rates even in an environment with highly variable atmospheric CO2 concentration. Soil respiration rates, measured over a period of several weeks with the automated chambers, were in agreement with traditional point-in-time measurements, and the soil microclimate was not affected by the chambers. However, when extrapolated over a period of several weeks the point-in-time measurements overestimated CO2 efflux rates based on continuous measurements with the automated system.

Abbreviations: IRGA, Infrared gas analyzer • FACE, Free-air CO2 enrichment • Q10, the change in the rate of respiration with a 10°C change in soil temperature (i.e., a Q10 of 2 means that the rate doubles with a 10°C temperature change)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.