SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:476-483 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0019
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Norton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Norton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Hillslope Analysis
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling

FOREST, RANGE & WILDLAND SOILS

Runoff and Sediments from Hillslope Soils within a Native American Agroecosystem

J. B. Nortona,*, J. A. Sandorb and C. S. Whitec

a Dep. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3354
b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010
c Dep. of Biology, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131

* Corresponding author (jnorton4{at}uwyo.edu).


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Farmers of the Zuni Indian Reservation in New Mexico rely on materials transported from upper watersheds to maintain productivity of some of the oldest agricultural fields in North America. This study determined runoff and sediment production from hillslopes as functions of slope position, soil cover, and rainfall characteristics. Runoff was collected from plots in summit or shoulder [SU], backslope [BS], and footslope [FS] positions and in bare soil, microbiotic crust, oak, juniper, pinyon, and grass cover. In rainfall events that generated runoff, sediment C and N concentrations decreased with total sediment yield, but C/N ratios increased. Carbon/nitrogen ratios were generally lower in sediments from early season events. Backslope plots yielded the most sediment (125 g m–2) and the most organic C (2.2 g m–2), total N (116 mg m–2), and total P (34.2 mg m–2), but those from SU plots had the highest concentrations (e.g., 31 g C kg–1 compared with 23 g C kg–1 at BS and FS). Bare soil and microbiotic crust plots yielded the most sediments (441 g m–2) and grass the least (107 g m–2). Though variable, oak plots yielded more C (32.6 g m–2) and N (1.5 g m–2) than others, but bare soil and microbiotic crust plots yielded the most P (62.7 and 54.4 mg m–2, respectively). Slope position, cover type, and rainfall characteristics interact to influence movement and processing of materials responsible for agriculturally, ecologically, and hydrologically important alluvium-derived soils in this semiarid agroecosystem.

Abbreviations: BS, backslope • FS, footslope • OM, organic material • P, phosphorus • SOM, soil organic matter • SU, summit or shoulder


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Sustained productivity of ancient agricultural soils on alluvial fans of the Zuni Indian Reservation exemplifies the importance of hillslope processes that link uplands to alluvium-derived soils (Bull, 1997; Peterson et al., 2001). Many ancient agricultural fields on alluvial fans in North America's Colorado Plateau continue to be farmed by Native Americans, including the Zuni of western New Mexico (Damp et al., 2002; Muenchrath et al., 2002; Homburg et al., 2005; Sandor et al., 2007). Zuni farmers do not use added fertilizers in traditional runoff agriculture but recognize the role of upland hillslopes in sustaining production of corn (Zea mays L.) and other crops in the semiarid environment. They work to enhance processes that link hillslopes to their fields by preventing channel incision and diverting runoff (Cushing, 1920; Norton et al., 2002). Farmers interviewed by Pawluk (1995) defined sediment as "good rich soil... from up there; rains bring the soil down... where we get the nice fertilizer from." They described upland hillslopes as contributing "all kinds of fertilizers and water" to "the rich place a little ways out from the wash" (Norton, 2000). This ancient agroecosystem creates an excellent setting for investigating contributions by upland hillslopes to nutrient cycling and retention in alluvium-derived soils of headwater ephemeral streams, which are often the most biologically diverse and productive landforms in semiarid landscapes.

Hillslope runoff and sediment transport processes have been described by many researchers (Leopold et al., 1966; Schumm and Mosley, 1973; Selby, 1993; Bull, 1997). The unique terrain of the Colorado Plateau creates lithologically segmented hillslopes that control the distribution of vegetation and soils (Norton et al., 2003), as well as the quantity and composition of runoff and sediments. Our objective was to describe contributions of upland hillslopes to downslope alluvial fans as influenced by slope position, cover type, and rainfall characteristics on the Zuni Indian Reservation in New Mexico. We focused on hillslopes in headwater drainages where archaeological evidence shows that downslope alluvial fans have been farmed by Native Americans for >1000 yr.

Previous work established that organic C and total N and P contents along summit-to-toeslope transects follow parabolic trends that peak in soils of wooded BS on the hillslopes of our study area. Mineral N and P contents in the same soils increase linearly from summits to toeslopes (Norton et al., 2003). This suggests that hillslope processes mix and decompose organic materials as they are transported downslope toward agricultural fields. In this study, we investigated how slope position and cover type influence the yield and composition of hillslope sediments and organic materials. Additionally, we investigated the relationships between sediment composition and rainfall parameters in this distinctive, summer-rainfall-driven system.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In this three-part study, we analyzed the quantity and composition of summer hillslope runoff as influenced by (i) slope position, (ii) cover type, and (iii) rainfall characteristics. We collected data in three small watersheds above long-term runoff agricultural fields on the Zuni Indian Reservation, New Mexico, in the southeastern part of the Colorado Plateau physiographic province (Fig. 1 ). The reservation lies at 1800- to 2400-m elevation and receives an average of 300 mm of precipitation annually, much of which often comes during thunderstorms in July, August, and September (Fig. 2 ). In Zuni runoff agriculture, farmers rely on deep soils on alluvial fans to store winter precipitation (typically snow and low-intensity rainfall) for early crop growth and on summer precipitation for crop maturity and grain production.


Figure 1
View larger version (203K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Study area location and physiographic provinces of the Southwest.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Long-term average monthly precipitation (1949–2005) for Zuni, NM (from the Western Regional Climate Center (2006).

 
The Sanchez watershed covers 68 ha, the Laate watershed 7 ha, and the Weekoty watershed 125 ha. Each of the watersheds lies in the eastern half of the Zuni Reservation at about 2070-m elevation (Fig. 3 ). Distribution of soils and vegetation corresponds to slope positions (described by Norton et al., 2003). Broad, level summit and shoulder positions, with 0 to 20% slopes, have shallow, sandy Entisols covered by open pinyon(Pinus edulis Engelm.)–juniper (Juniperus spp.)–oak (Quercus gambelii Nutt.) woodlands with appreciable ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson), shrubs such as wavy-leaf oak [Quercus x pauciloba Rydb. (pro sp.) (gambelii x turbinella)], mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus Raf.), fragrant ash (Fraxinus cuspidata Torr.), and antelope bitterbrush [Purshia tridentata (Pursh) DC.] and Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco] in protected areas. Microbiotic crusts and native grasses (e.g., Stipa spp., blue grama [Bouteloua gracilis (Willd. ex Kunthi) Lag. ex Griffiths], squirreltail (Elymus elymoides [Raf.] Swezey ssp. elymoides), and mutton grass [Poa fendleriana (Steud.) Vasey]) cover open areas on summit and shoulder positions.


Figure 3
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Topography, slope positions, and runoff plot locations within the three watershed study sites on the Zuni Indian Reservation (modified from Norton et al., 2003).

 
Backslopes, with 20 to 70% slopes, and FS, with 2 to 25% slopes, are covered by more dense pinyon–juniper–oak vegetation with very little ground cover or microbiotic crusts in interspaces. Backslope soils formed in loamy colluvium over siltstone residuum and grade from shallow Entisols on upper BS to deep, well-developed Alfisols on FS. Toeslopes, with 0 to 10% slopes, are covered by big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.), western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A. Löve], and blue grama with components of rabbitbrush [Chrysothamnus nauseosus (Pallas ex Pursh) Britt] and weedy herbaceous vegetation in wash areas.

Runoff and Sediment by Slope Position
We collected and analyzed summer storm runoff (approximately 1 May to 31 August) from 14 sediment traps below 20-m2 bounded plots (2.5 by 8 m) (Williams and Buckhouse, 1991; Gellis, 1998) at the three study sites (four mesa top, six BS, and four FS plots; see Fig. 3 and Table 1). Data were collected from plots at the Sanchez site (two BS and two FS plots), the Laate site (two SU and two BS plots), and the Weekoty site (two SU plots) during the summer of 1996 and from the Weekoty site (two SU, two BS, and two FS plots) during the summers of 1997 and 1998 (Table 1). Yield–landscape position relationships were consistent among the sites and data-collection periods. The plots were installed at locations with vegetation and soils representative of each slope position. Samples were captured in 19-L buckets from which 4-L, thoroughly mixed subsamples were collected after each runoff event. The depth of runoff trapped in collection buckets was measured for calculation of runoff volume by event. Subsamples were allowed to settle in refrigerators at 4°C and then decanted. Sediment samples were air dried and stored for lab analyses. The supernatant was preserved with a dilute solution of phenylmercuric acetate and stored for solute analysis. Rainfall was recorded from rain gauges at each runoff plot and at a tipping bucket rain gauge equipped with a CRX-20 data logger (Campbell Scientific Equipment, Logan, UT) located in the Weekoty watershed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Number of runoff plots monitored at each study site, growing season, and slope position{dagger}.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4. Mean summer runoff and sediment yield by slope position, 1996 to 1998, based on averages of sums from each plot for each field season{dagger}.

 
Runoff and Sediment by Soil Cover Type
We installed 12 1-m2 bounded plots (2 by 0.5 m) with sediment traps, two plots in each of six cover types, at the Weekoty site (bare soil, grass, pinyon pine, juniper, oak, and microbiotic soil crust; see Fig. 3 for approximate locations). Plots were selected to represent pure stands of each prevalent cover type as determined in Norton et al. (2003). Ground beneath the trees was covered by litter of that species without appreciable amounts of other vegetation, which is typical for this semiarid pinyon–juniper woodland. The plots were located on FS with 7 to 12% slopes. The sediment traps were monitored during the summers of 1997 and 1998. Sediments and runoff were measured and treated the same as for the 20-m2 slope position plots.

All sediment samples were oven dried at 105°C. Particle-size distribution was determined using the sieve and pipette method (Gee and Bauder, 1986). Total C and N concentrations were determined using a Fissions EA1100 dry combustion CNSHO analyzer (Fissions Instruments, Milano, Italy). Inorganic C was determined by coulombmeter in a subset of samples and found to be insignificant relative to total C values. Total P concentrations were determined by alkaline oxidation (Dick and Tabatabai, 1977). Available-P concentrations were measured by the Olsen extraction method (Olsen and Sommers, 1982). Runoff samples were analyzed for cation concentration by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and anion concentration with a Technicon AutoAnalyzer (Technicon, Tarrytown, NY).

Data Analysis
The yield and composition of runoff water and sediments were analyzed by slope position, cover type, and several rainfall parameters. Also, yields were estimated for whole watersheds. For analyses by slope position and cover type, we analyzed runoff and sediment data by average summer (May–August) yield and average concentration during the study period.

For runoff and sediment yield, the experimental unit averaged for analysis of means (basis for n) was the total amount of a given constituent collected during each summer at each runoff plot. This amounted to a total of eight plot-years at the SU, eight at the BS, and six at the FS slope position runoff plots (see Table 1) and four plot-years at each cover-type runoff plot. Although we also analyzed yields by event, only results for total summer yields of each constituent are presented here because they represent gross movement of materials toward agricultural fields.

Concentration was analyzed by runoff event. The experimental unit averaged for analysis of means (basis for n) was the concentration of a given constituent collected after each runoff event that yielded sediment at each plot during the entire study period. This amounted to 34 events at the SU, 39 at the BS, and 31 at the FS runoff plots. At the cover-type runoff plots, bare soil plots yielded runoff 27 times during the two summers, microbiotic crust 30 times, oak cover 26 times, juniper cover 25 times, pinyon cover 22 times, and grass cover 24 times.

Means were compared by calculating least significant differences with the GLM procedure (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). To ensure normal distribution and equivalent variance, particle-size distribution data (presented as percentages) were arcsine transformed before statistical analyses.

We examined sediment yield and composition from hillslopes in the Weekoty watershed as functions of several characteristics of rainfall measured at the tipping-bucket rain gauge. Maximum rainfall intensity, rainfall duration, duration of maximum intensity, time from start of event until maximum intensity, and length of rainless period before start of event (Ferreira, 1990) were calculated for each event based on a 15-min gap to distinguish events. Each parameter was correlated against runoff and sediment properties from 1997 and 1998 at the Weekoty watershed by regression analysis (trend line function in Microsoft Excel). Total sediment yield from each event is presented here as a surrogate for rainfall parameters because it integrates the many variables that affect relationships between rainfall and runoff and reveals relationships between sediment composition and storm intensity.

To estimate yields of runoff, sediment, and selected constituents by whole watershed, we extrapolated the runoff and sediment data from slope position and cover-type plots to the whole watersheds by integrating with spatial distribution data presented in Norton et al. (2003).


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Rainfall
Total summer precipitation was above average in both 1997 and 1998 (Table 2) (the weather station was not installed during 1996). Rain events that generated little or no runoff were far more frequent than larger, stream-flow-generating events, and provided the majority of precipitation (Table 3). Comparison with long-term intensity–duration–frequency curves for the Southwest (U.S. Weather Bureau, 1955) shows that there were no exceptionally intense storms during our study period. Rainfall came as two types of events: on fringes of convection thunderstorms or as frontal systems (Tuan et al., 1973). Reid et al. (1999) noted a similar dichotomy of rainfall events in a study at Los Alamos National Laboratory, about 250 km northeast of Zuni. Long-term daily precipitation data from Zuni (Balling and Wells, 1990) shows that nearly 90% of annual precipitation comes as minor, non-runoff-generating events (Fig. 4 ). Syed et al. (2003), working at the USDA Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed near Tombstone, AZ, found that storms yielding low amounts of rainfall were much more frequent than high-yielding events. They also emphasized the importance of the storm core (defined as the portion of the storm having intensities >25 mm h–1) in generating runoff, which is relatively small in areal extent and therefore less likely to occur on smaller watersheds (Syed et al., 2003). Once a storm core reaches a watershed, however, the smaller the watershed the more likely it will generate runoff (Goodrich et al., 1997).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Approximate1997 and 1998 summer precipitation at the Weekoty study site.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Total rainfall and yield and mean C/N ratio for sediment and organic material components in four peak rainfall–intensity categories.{dagger}

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Distribution of summer (April–September) daily precipitation, 1896 to 1985, Zuni Pueblo (as compiled by Balling and Wells, 1990).

 
Slope Position
Both yield and composition of sediment varied significantly by slope position (Tables 4 and 5), but yield and composition of runoff water did not (Norton, 2000). Included in the analyses are 104 samples from 28 summer storms at the 20-m2 slope position plots. Runoff coefficients (millimeters runoff/millimeters precipitation x 100) averaged 3.8% for all the plot-years combined and ranged from 1.4 to 8.1% This compares favorably to nine hydrologic studies in pinyon–juniper environments reviewed by Wilcox (1994), in which runoff ranged from 1 to 23% of total precipitation, with all but one being 8% or less. Runoff coefficients for large storms in the U.S. Southwest are generally about 25% (Kirkby, 1978). Our values concur with our rainfall intensity data to show that there were no exceptionally intense storms during the study period.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 5. Concentration of nutrients in sediments by slope position{dagger}.

 
Backslopes yielded more than twice as much sediment as SU and FS (Table 4). Backslopes also yielded the most C, N, and P in sediments, but concentrations of these soil organic matter (SOM) constituents in BS sediments were equivalent to or less than SU and FS sediments (Table 5). This may be a result of relatively erosive flows due to steeper slopes, finer textured soils, and lack of ground cover (see Fig. 3), which remove proportionally more mineral soil materials from BS, while relatively gentle flows on the other two positions, particularly summits, move proportionally more low-density, relatively undecomposed surface litter organic material (OM) fragments.

These data support the work of Norton et al. (2003): stable soil microbial environments on SU positions, disturbance-driven erosional environments on BS, and depositional environments on FS. The relatively high erosion rates on BS may contribute to mineralizing soil microbial environments with higher concentrations of mineral C, N, and P in SOM and also to deposition of mineralizing OM on FS, although we did not measure the movement of such materials among the slope positions. Conversely, summit positions are relatively stable with respect to erosion, which probably contributes to relatively stable organic matter dynamics, as described by Norton et al. (2003), where efficient nutrient cycling in an immobilizing soil microbial environment leads to low concentrations of mineral C, N, and P in SOM.

Cover Type
Cover type impacted both yield and composition of sediment washed from the 1-m2 plots (Tables 6 and 7), but not that of runoff water. Included in the analyses are 154 sediment and runoff samples collected from the 1-m2 soil cover plots during the summers of 1997 and 1998. Both bare soil and microbiotic crust cover yielded significantly more sediment than pinyon and grass plots (Table 6). Oak and juniper plots yielded intermediate amounts of sediment. Sediment texture followed much the same trend as yield, with the highest yielding cover types generally having the coarsest sediments. Except for oak plots, yields of C, N, and P in sediments depended largely on overall sediment yield. Sediments from oak cover were very rich in SOM, as indicated by very high yields of C and N. Based on sediment yield, microbiotic crust sediments had lower C/N and C/P ratios than those from other cover types, possibly due to decomposing algae and lichen from crusts in the sediments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 6. Mean summer runoff and sediment yield and composition by vegetation cover type. Yields are based on averages of sums from each plot for each field season{dagger}.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 7. Concentration of nutrients in sediments by cover type{dagger}.

 
Concentrations (Table 7) of both organic C and total N in sediments from the oak plots were significantly higher than other cover types. Microbiotic soil crust sediments had significantly lower C, N, and P concentrations than all the cover types except bare soil.

Yields of sediment and runoff were considerably higher from the 1-m2 cover plots than from the 20-m2 slope position plots for the same rain events. This discrepancy may be due to a scale effect (Wilcox et al., 2003) in which longer slope lengths in the larger plots create transmission losses during the frequent small rainfall events.

Rainfall–Sediment Interactions
Most rain at the Weekoty watershed in the 1997 and 1998 field seasons fell in low-intensity events (<20 mm h–1) that did not generate runoff or produce sediment (Table 3). Moderate-intensity rains of 21 to 40 mm h–1, with apparently the most erosive combination of frequency and power, produced by far the most sediment and OM components (C, N, and P). Storms with higher than 60 mm h–1 peak intensity were rare but produced much more sediment per event (37 g m–2 average) than the mid- (10 g m–2 for both 21–40 and 41–60 mm h–1 ranges) and low-intensity storms (0.10 g m–2). Sediment C/N ratios increased steadily with peak intensity, which suggests that lower intensity events transport higher quality, more decomposed OM.

Sediment yield at the Weekoty watershed 20-m2 plots is weakly correlated with runoff yield, but strongly correlated with rainfall intensity (P < 0.005) for storms we measured in 1997 and 1998 (Norton, 2000). This suggests that, with respect to sediment (but not runoff) yield, rainfall intensity is more influential than depth, duration, frequency, time to maximum, and the other rainfall parameters we calculated. Therefore total sediment yield at the 20-m2 plots is a reasonable indicator of runoff erosive power, total rainfall notwithstanding. Relationships between sediment composition and sediment yield indicate how combined storm intensity affects the composition of materials moving from hillslopes. Figures 5a and 5b show negative logarithmic relationships between sediment yield and concentrations of organic C and total N, suggesting again that frequent, low-intensity rains move sediments with higher OM contents, while infrequent larger events move more sediment. Figure 5c shows a positive logarithmic relationship between sediment yield and C/N ratio, suggesting that more highly decomposed material is transported by lower intensity rainfall events. These data show that OM concentration and composition in low-intensity events are highly variable (low correlation coefficients), while those of higher intensity events are consistently low. Our results suggest that many low-intensity events yield sediments with high concentrations of high-quality OM, whereas higher intensity events always yield sediments with low concentrations of low-quality OM. This emphasizes the importance of low-intensity rainfall events in nutrient cycling and transport (Sala and Lauenroth, 1982).


Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Relationship between sediment yield and concentrations of C and N in sediments. *,** Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.

 
Considered within the context of Zuni's annual precipitation pattern, these data may indicate pulses of OM decomposition and movement at the beginning of the runoff season, usually in early July, which is a critical time for moisture and nutrient delivery to crops and natural vegetation. Zuni winters have freezing nighttime temperatures, warm daytime temperatures, and low-intensity rain or snow from frontal systems that generate little runoff (Tuan et al., 1973; Western Regional Climate Center, 2006). This combination creates frequent freeze–thaw cycles that accelerate both physical and microbial breakdown of forest litter (Honeycutt, 1995). In early spring, warmer daytime temperatures intensify freeze–thaw and bring drying–rewetting cycles that also enhance decomposition (Cui and Caldwell, 1997). Hot, dry conditions in May and June desiccate surface soils and organic debris. This winter–spring–early summer pattern may physically break down OM accumulated on slopes since the previous rainy season, leading to a flush of OM with relatively low C/N at the beginning of summer rainy seasons (Fig. 6 ). Wilcox (1994) reported a similar seasonal effect: erodibility of soils in pinyon–juniper interspaces was highest at the end of the winter freeze–thaw cycles and lowest at the end of the summer rainy season. As the rainy season progressed, slopes became more and more depleted of decomposed (low C/N) material.


Figure 6
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. Sediment C/N for the 1996 to 1998 rainy season (July–September) from 20-m2 runoff plots plotted against Day of the Year of the storm. Yields of total sediment, organic material, and particle-size distribution do not follow significant trends with respect to date.

 
Integration of the areal extent of slope positions and cover from Norton et al. (2003) with runoff data from this study (Table 8) shows estimated total sediment production from each slope position map unit in the three watersheds. These values show that extension of transect and runoff plot data to whole watersheds amplifies the effects of BS in all except the Laate site, where BS make up a smaller portion of the watershed. In the Sanchez watershed, the SU position is large because of bare exposed bedrock on the mesa top that was classified as shoulder.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 8. Estimated total summer runoff and loss of sediment and nutrients by slope position for the three study sites on total area basis{dagger}.

 

   CONCLUSIONS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
 
Our data suggest that the unique combination of lithology, topography, and rainfall pattern underlie transport and transformation of sediments and OM that, in turn, may affect soil productivity on alluvial fans of the Zuni area. Infrequent, intense storms are responsible for shaping the landscape, and frequent minor events may play pivotal roles in processing forest floor organic matter, sustaining plant growth, and creating accumulation of materials on lower slopes that may set the stage for major movement of materials during larger events.

The results of this research contribute to the understanding of watershed hillslope characteristics that underlie the sustainability of runoff agriculture practiced by Zuni farmers for many centuries. Relationships among soil, landform, and vegetation patterns point to the wooded BS as a driving force behind movement and processing of runoff, sediment, and OM. Backslopes' large areal extent, steepness, and slowly permeable subsoils covered by pinyon–juniper–oak forests yield OM-rich sediments that may be responsible for sustained productivity of alluvium-derived soils lower in watersheds.

Rainfall patterns dominated by minor events that generate short-distance sheet flow but not stream flow, create an OM-processing system that stimulates mineralization as it mixes materials and carries them downslope. Less-frequent flushing flows move accumulated sediments and OM from lower slopes to alluvial landforms where traditional agricultural fields are typically located.

Traditional alluvial fan farming remains an important cultural activity among the Zuni and other Native American tribes in the Southwest, but the importance of hydrological connectivity between upland hillslopes and alluvial landforms extends beyond its value to traditional agriculture. Sediments, OM, and runoff from hillslopes are valuable resources for sustaining ecological diversity and productivity in floodplains, riparian areas, alluvial fans, and downstream aquatic systems. Functional floodplains and alluvial fans store sediments, attenuate peak flows, and absorb runoff that can maintain downstream perennial flows. Without functional hydrological connectivity between hillslopes and alluvial landforms (due to channel incision or channelization), products of hillslope erosion are lost—to become environmental liabilities in a feedback spiral of soil degradation where sediments and constricted flows damage downstream aquatic systems (Bull, 1997). Channel incision, or arroyo cutting, is a major issue across the Southwest (Cooke and Reeves, 1976; Elliot et al., 1999). This research improves our understanding of the movement and composition of materials eroding from hillslopes, which, in intact alluvial systems, sustain crucial cultural, ecological, and hydrological functions of alluvial fans and floodplains.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was funded by National Science Foundation Grant no. DEB-9528458. A Research Assistantships for Minority High School Students supplemental award funded Kate Brown and her Zuni high school science class to monitor sediment traps. We are indebted to the Zuni Sustainable Agriculture Project, the Zuni Conservation Project, and the Zuni Tribe. We thank Jeff Homburg, Todd Carlson, Marnie Criley, and Clara Wheeler for laboratory analysis and Troy Lucio, Lindsay Quam, Roman Pawluk, and participants in Zuni's Job Training Partnerships Act (JTPA) program for field assistance. We are grateful to Tom DeLuca, Urszula Norton, and Stephen Siebert for technical advice and editorial review, and to the research team, including Deborah Muenchrath, Stephen Williams, Pete Stahl, and Mark Ankeny.

Received for publication January 13, 2006.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soil Sci.Home page
J. B. Norton, J. A. Sandor, C. S. White, and V. Laahty
Organic Matter Transformations through Arroyos and Alluvial Fan Soils within a Native American Agroecosystem
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 5, 2007; 71(3): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Norton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Norton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Hillslope Analysis
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome