|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
* Corresponding author (laurence.greenfield{at}canterbury.ac.nz).
Both of these interesting papers unfortunately contain information that is at variance with current knowledge about the chemistry of soil organic N and require comment.
From Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Mulvaney et al. (2006), one can calculate that the % value of Illinois soil N test (ISNT) N level/Soil total N level in nonresponsive and responsive soils is 19% (range 1339, n = 33) and 18% (range 841, n = 69), respectively. In several cases in Table 1 where lower and upper total soils N values are given if upper rather than lower levels are used then the corresponding % values become 15 (range 939) and 12 (range 741).
The nature of this alkali-labile N fraction, which is substantial, is believed to be largely amino sugar N (Khan et al., 2001, Mulvaney et al., 2001), but this is unlikely for the following reasons. Enough is known about the chemistry and biology of soil organic N (Bremner, 1965; Stevenson, 1982; Greenfield, 2001) to suggest that (a) correction factors need to be applied to correct for amino sugar losses during acid hydrolysis; (b) the bulk of the amino sugars in soil originate largely from polymeric, for example, chitin rather than monomeric, amino sugars occurring in fungi and invertebrates. Chitin remains insoluble during hot alkali, but not acid hydrolysis (Foster and Webber, 1960; Bremner, 1965; Stevenson, 1982; Greenfield, 2001).
The ISNT was developed without due attention to these points and although reducing environmental and fiscal damage is a sensible goal in land management it may be wise to better ascertain the chemical basis of the ISNT before widespread adoption.
From Table 3 of Martens et al. (2006) one can calculate that approximately 35% (range 1557, n = 50) and 6% (range 210, n = 50) of the total soil N occurred as hydrolyzable NH4N and amino sugar-N, respectively. The NH4N values particularly those in excess of 35% considerably exceed the "normal" values of 2025% found in temperate soils (Bremner, 1965; Stevenson, 1982) and in the absence of data concerning preexisting levels of exchangeable and nonexchangeable NH4N in the soils used must be treated with caution. The amino sugar-N values reported in this paper, like those in Martens and Loeffleman (2003), have not been corrected for hydrolytic losses. A similar case applies to the uncorrected amino sugar N values reported by Khan et al. (2001) and Mulvaney et al. (2001).
Received for publication February 27, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |