|
|
||||||||
USDA-ARS, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
USDA-ARS, Dep. of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Dep. of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108
Southern Minnesota Res. and Ext. Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN, 56093
* Corresponding author (dhuggins{at}wsu.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
13C, bulk density, and pH. Tillage by crop sequence interactions occurred as treatments with MP and SS as well as fallow averaged 135 Mg SOC ha1 (0- to 45-cm depth), while CP treatments with corn (CC and CS) and NT with CC averaged 164 Mg SOC ha1. Crop sequence effects on SOC (0- to 45-cm depth) occurred when tillage was reduced with CP and NT averaging 15% greater SOC in CC than SS. In addition to less C inputs than CC, SS accelerated rates of SOC decomposition. Tillage effects on SOC were greatest in CC where CP had 26% and NT 20% more SOC than MP, whereas SOC in SS was similar across tillage treatments. Up to 33% of the greater SOC under CC for CP and NT, compared with MP, occurred below tillage operating depths. Substantial losses of SOC were estimated (1.6 Mg SOC ha1 yr1) despite lowering SOC decay rates with reduced tillage and high levels of C inputs with CC. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Crop rotation can regulate C substrate availability and decomposition rates by: (1) controlling the quantity, quality, and periodicity of C inputs via residues and roots; and (2) modifying soil and crop canopy environmental conditions as resources (i.e., water, nutrients) are consumed, crop biomass accumulates and residues and roots are cycled to soil. The amount of C derived from crop residues, root biomass and rhizodeposition, and the timing of C return to soil varies considerably among crops (Kay, 1990; Franzluebbers et al., 1995; Paustian et al., 1997; Allmaras et al., 2000; Molina et al., 2001). Despite differences in the quality and source of residue- and root-derived C, SOC is often linearly correlated with C inputs (Larson et al., 1972; Rasmussen et al., 1980; Zielke and Christenson, 1986; Havlin et al., 1990; Huggins et al., 1998a). Exceptions occur, however, and lack of correlation between C inputs and SOC has been attributed to cropping system (i.e., residue quality and soil disturbance) and edaphic controls (i.e., clay content, aggregate formation and turnover) over SOC availability and decomposition rates (Bloom et al., 1982; Campbell et al., 1991; Huggins et al., 1998a; Soon, 1998).
Studies evaluating the combined influence of crop and tillage management on SOC often conclude that crop rotation effects are primarily due to differences in C additions, while major tillage effects are on SOC decomposition rates and losses via soil erosion (Rasmussen et al., 1980; Havlin et al., 1990; Potter et al., 1997). Under semiarid conditions, reduced soil disturbance has increased SOC only in conjunction with intensification of crop rotation and elimination of fallow periods (Campbell et al., 1995; Potter et al., 1997; Schomberg and Jones, 1999; Halvorson et al., 2002). Few studies, however, have examined the interactive effects of tillage and crop rotation on SOC under subhumid and humid environments. Yang and Kay (2001) hypothesized that reduced tillage would accentuate crop rotation effects on SOC storage; but effects of rotation combinations including corn, soybean, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) on SOC in the 0- to 40-cm depth were comparable for chisel and MP tillage in a cold, humid environment. These results agreed with those reported by Angers et al. (1992) under similar climatic conditions. In a warm, subhumid climate, Havlin et al. (1990) concluded that rotation effects on SOC were primarily due to differences in C inputs; however, significant tillage by rotation interactions were apparent at the site with finer textured soil. Here, no differences in SOC occurred between the CP and disk tillage as compared with NT for the SS rotation, but significant increases in SOC occurred with NT in the continuous sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) rotation. These data suggest that rotation effects on SOC can be significant when soil disturbance is reduced.
Cropping systems of the northern Corn Belt are currently dominated by corn and soybean production under a variety of tillage practices. Highest levels of returned C for annual crops are typically produced by corn, which can exceed C levels returned by grain legumes (e.g., soybean) by over 1.5 times (Buyanovsky and Wagner, 1986; Paustian et al., 1997; Allmaras et al., 2000). Decomposition of crop residues and SOC could be accelerated by soybean as compared with corn as soybean: (i) reduces soil aggregate size, stability, and C content (Fahad et al., 1982; Bathke and Blake, 1984; McCracken et al., 1985; Ellsworth et al., 1991); (ii) uses less soil water (Allmaras et al., 1975); (iii) provides less surface residue cover; (iv) undergoes finer physical break-up of residues (Buyanovsky and Wagner; 1986); and (v) generally has residues with lower C/N ratios and lignin contents (Buyanovsky and Wagner, 1986; Broder and Wagner, 1988; Torstensson, 1998).
Overall, we hypothesize that corn and soybean sequences will have greater influence on SOC storage and dynamics under low versus high soil disturbance. Specifically, as tillage is reduced, we expect that soybean sequences in comparison with CC will: (i) accelerate SOC decomposition rates; and (ii) result in significantly lower overall SOC storage than can be explained by a reduction in C inputs. Furthermore, we hypothesize that reducing tillage will be insufficient to maintain or increase SOC to native levels despite large C inputs under annual cropping. Considering these hypotheses, our objectives are to: (1) evaluate tillage practice (MP, CP and NT) and crop sequence (CC, SS and CS) effects on SOC storage after 14 yr; (2) use natural 13C abundance to quantify interactive effects of tillage and crop sequence on SOC dynamics; (3) identify causal factors and present multiple working hypotheses that aid the evaluation of treatment effects on observed SOC storage and estimates of SOC decomposition; and (4) simulate long-term effects of tillage and crop sequence on SOC storage, and the C inputs and SOC dynamics required to maintain SOC.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The conversion of native tall-grass prairie to agricultural use in the area dates back to 1870. Before 1973, the study area was managed as a general enterprise farm with dairy and likely planted to corn-small grain-alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) based rotations with manure applications. Moldboard plow-based tillage systems with CC were used between 1973 and 1980, and in the spring of 1976, artificial subsurface drainage was installed 1.2-m deep at 23-m spacing.
The experiment was a randomized split-plot design with four replications. Main plots consisted of tillage treatments and subplots were crop sequence treatments. Plots were 6.1 by 16.7 m with eight crop rows, each 76-cm wide. Tillage treatments consisted of MP, CP, and NT and crop sequences were CC, SS, and CS. Before fall tillage, corn stalks were chopped, whereas soybean residue required no treatment. Primary tillage with MP (25- to 30-cm deep) or CP (15-cm deep) was performed in the fall and was followed by spring disking in the CP treatment and tine-type field cultivation in the MP treatment. Tillage depths are further detailed in Betz et al. (1998). No primary or secondary tillage was conducted in NT. The same planter was used in all tillage systems and wheel traffic was controlled to impact only one side of the row. Interrow cultivation following planting was performed in MP and CP treatments; traffic was consistent with that at planting. Soil-test recommended rates of P and K were band applied with the planter and 225 kg N ha1 as NH4NO3 was spring broadcast in treatments with corn. Weeds and insects were chemically controlled with recommended materials and application methods.
Soils were sampled in June 1994 following procedures of Allmaras et al. (1988) to measure soil bulk density and obtain material for SOC analyses. Composites of 12 soil cores (1.8 cm diam.) from four depths (07.5, 7.515, 1530, and 3045 cm) were collected from the center of three non-tracked inter-rows (four cores per inter-row). Soil sampling was centered in the interrow to minimize effects of current crop root biomass, and located at least 1 m from the plot boundary to avoid contamination from neighboring treatments. All treatments and replications were sampled including both phases of the CS sequence. In addition, three alley-ways adjacent to the plots, fallowed since 1980, were soil sampled using the same procedure. The fallowed alley-ways were chisel plowed and repeatedly field cultivated as needed to control weeds.
Carbon and Carbon-13 Natural Abundance Analyses
Source C inputs from above- and belowground biomass were estimated from grain yield. Grain yield of each plot was determined after physiological maturity by harvesting 15 m of two center rows with a plot combine. Grain yield was not measured during the 19901993 seasons; yields were estimated using the mean response to experimental treatments (19801989) and the long-term (19801993) mean annual yields of soybean and corn at the Southern Minnesota Research and Outreach Center. Therefore, these estimates included adjustments for treatment and year effects.
Shoot biomass was estimated from the harvest index (0.48 for corn and 0.29 for soybean) measured from a nearby experiment during the same time period (Crookston et al., 1991). Shoot biomass and C concentrations were used to determine C returned to the soil from aboveground biomass. As in other studies (Huggins et al., 1998b; Collins et al., 1999) an estimate of C additions from roots of soybean was based on a root/shoot ratio of 0.38 and root C concentrations reported by Buyanovsky and Wagner (1986), but our estimates of root/shoot (including grain) ratio for corn (0.53) was derived from Brye et al. (2002). Carbon inputs were cumulated over the 14-yr period and expressed as total estimated C return per treatment. Although both CS and soybean-corn (SC) sequences were sampled and analyzed, no significant differences in soil variables occurred and the treatment mean, indicated as CS, was compared to CC and SS sequences.
Representative samples of aboveground corn and soybean dry matter and sieved (2 mm) soils from each plot were ball-milled and analyzed for C and 13C/12C ratio with an elemental C-N analyzer interfaced with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Carlo Erba, model NA 1500 and Fisons, Optima model; Fisons, Middlewich-Cheshire, UK). Coarse organic matter retained on the 2-mm sieve was separated from the soil samples, dried, ground, and returned to the sample before ball-milling. Soil pH was determined in a 1:5 soil/0.01 M CaCl2 suspension. Inorganic C was removed using a H3PO4 method (Follett et al., 1997) modified to remove both carbonates and sulfates (Wilts et al., 2004). Soil samples above 15 cm required no treatment for removal of carbonates. The C isotope ratios were expressed as
13C values:
![]() | [(1)] |
13C of 18.2
) and soil (
13C of 17.6
) served as working standards and
13C values were calculated relative to Pee Dee Belemnite as an original standard.
The SOC was partitioned into C3 and C4 sources using a mixing equation:
![]() | [(2)] |
m =
13C of SOC from a mixture of C4 and C3 sources,
a =
13C from C4 source (corn residue = 12.0
),
b =
13C from C3 source (soybean residue = 26.4
), f = fraction of organic C from C4 source, and (1 f ) = fraction of organic C from C3 source. All of the SOC did not originate from corn- or soybean-derived C; however, we assumed that
13C labeling with C4 and C3derived C was similar over time. Soil C was expressed on a volume basis using soil bulk density measured at the time of sampling. Analysis of variance was used to determine significant (0.05 probability level) crop sequence effects on SOC variables (SAS Institute, 1996).
Carbon Modeling
The dynamics of C3 and C4derived SOC were evaluated using a two-C-pool model consisting of Pool F, in which decomposition is rapid, and Pool S, with a slower rate of decomposition (Henin and Dupuis, 1945; Jenkinson, 1988; Huggins et al., 1998b). Annual C inputs (A) enter Pool F where labile C is rapidly decomposed and respired as CO2 (mineralization) and where a fraction, h (the humification rate constant), enters Pool S each year. A fraction, k, of SOC in Pool S is also decomposed each year. The change in SOC over time is:
![]() | [(3)] |
![]() | [(4)] |
![]() | [(5)] |
![]() | [(6)] |
The estimated C0 values were applied in Eq. [5] under CC treatments to calculate k for C3derived SOC and under SS treatments to calculate k for C4derived SOC. The k values were then used along with A and measured Cs to determine h for both C4 and C3derived SOC for all tillage and crop sequence treatments using Eq. [4]. One final criterion was added following these calculations: a lower limit of h for soybean C inputs was set at 0.1 yr1, approximately equal to the concentration of lignin (Broder and Wagner, 1988; Andriulo et al., 1999). This lower bound for h prevented calculation of negative h values that occurred for SS under CP and NT. When h values reached the lower bound during the fitting procedure, h was held constant and k values were adjusted using Eq. [4], thereby estimating priming effects of C inputs on SOC decay rates.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
13C
13C were significant for all tillage treatments in the 0- to 7.5-cm depth with greatest values occurring in CC (17.83
), lowest in SS (19.21
) and intermediate values in CS (18.67
) and fallow (18.55
; Table 1). At depths below 7.5 cm, crop effects on soil
13C diminished, but there were significant differences between CC and sequences with soybean in MP (all depths) and in NT (30- to 45-cm depth). Significant tillage effects on soil
13C were limited to intermediate depths in CC where soil
13C in MP was greater than in reduced tillage treatments (Table 1).
|
13C with depth occurred within each tillage and crop sequence, as well as fallow (Table 1). In CC, soil
13C were relatively large near the surface for all tillage treatments; however,
13C in MP remained large and uniform with depth, whereas
13C in CP and NT decreased significantly at the 7.5- to 30-cm depths and then increased at the 30- to 45-cm depth. In contrast to CC, soil
13C in SS were lowest at surface depths and generally increased with depth in all tillage treatments.
Differences in soil
13C values arise from multiple, often confounding processes and treatments (Boutton and Yamaski, 1996; Huggins et al., 1998b). In this study, the annual rate of soil
13C change between CC and SS of 0.1
is similar to that found by Huggins et al. (1998b) and arises from in situ labeling of SOM with C additions from residues of either corn (
13C of 12.0
) or soybean (
13C of 26.4
). Soil incorporation of naturally labeled surface residue and shallow root C in CP and MP results in tillage-specific redistributions of residue (Staricka et al., 1991) and distinct depth patterns of soil
13C (Huggins et al., 1998b; Layese et al., 2002).
Soil
13C differences occurred at depths beyond physical mixing by tillage (30 to 45 cm) in MP and NT (Table 1). These data provide evidence that the influence of crop sequence and/or tillage can occur below tilled depths. Differential contributions of C at depths below tillage are expected from soybean versus corn due to dissimilarities in root distributions (Allmaras et al., 1975a, 1975b). A confounding factor is that SOC pools of differing stability are likely not uniformly labeled with 13C, due to historic variations in native prairie vegetation, crops produced, and atmospheric
13C (Huggins et al., 1998b). Consequently, if tillage or crop sequence differentially influences SOC decomposition, changes in soil
13C can occur independently of C inputs. For example, MP is the only tillage treatment where a significant crop sequence effect on soil
13C occurred at all depths (Table 1). This difference in soil
13C could have resulted not only from continued mixing of crop C inputs throughout the tillage zone with MP, but also from a large turnover of SOC and increasing influence of more stable SOC and/or more recent C additions on proportions of C3 and C4derived SOC. The similar soil
13C in CP for 7.5- to 45-cm depths across all crop sequences suggests less SOC turnover and dilution influence of C additions from the most recent 14 yr. Further interpretation of tillage and crop sequence effects on SOC can be derived from combining soil
13C with soil bulk density and SOC data.
Soil Organic Carbon
Total Soil Organic Carbon
Soil bulk density was not influenced by either tillage or crop sequence and averaged 1.08, 1.39, 1.40 and 1.59 g cm3, respectively for the 0- to 7.5-, 7.5- to 15-, 15- to 30- and 30- to 45-cm depths. Therefore, treatment effects on SOC resulted from differences of soil C concentration. Fallow alley-ways had greater soil bulk density than adjacent plot areas (data not shown). The soil bulk density data differ from many studies where increased densities were found under NT as compared with tilled treatments (Gantzer and Blake, 1978; Linn and Doran, 1984; Rasmussen, 1999; Balesdent et al., 2000; Kushwaha et al., 2001). Little effect of tillage or cropping treatments on bulk density, however, has also been reported (Campbell et al., 1995; Potter et al., 1997; Sainju et al., 2002). Previous measurements at this site showed marked increases of soil bulk density in wheel tracks of NT (Betz et al., 1998), which were avoided in our sampling procedure.
Total SOC was lowest in MP and greatest in CP, but significant crop sequence by tillage interactions occurred (Table 2). The NT and CP treatments had 15 and 16%, respectively, greater SOC in CC than in SS. In contrast, no crop sequence effects on SOC occurred in MP, where overall SOC was the lowest and no different from SOC in continuous fallow. Tillage effects on SOC were greatest in CC, where CP had 26% and NT 20% more SOC than MP. In CS, SOC averaged 23% greater in CP than MP, while SOC in NT was more than MP, but not significantly different. Continuous soybean was the only crop sequence where tillage had no influence on SOC. Interactive effects of tillage and crop sequence resulted in marked differences in SOC (045 cm). The CP treatments with corn and NT with CC averaged 164 Mg SOC ha1, compared with all MP and SS treatments, and NT treatments with soybean that averaged 137 Mg SOC ha1.
|
Factor (a): Carbon Input Differences Among Tillage Treatments and Crops
No significant differences in estimated crop inputs of C occurred among tillage treatments (Fig. 1
); however, estimated C inputs from corn averaged 1.8 times larger than soybean. Linear relationships between total SOC and estimated source C (both corn and soybean derived) occurred for all tillage treatments, however, the slope parameter was not statistically significant for NT and the equation is not given (Fig. 1a). A slope of 0.58 for CP (Fig. 1a) is unlikely as a direct response of SOC to C inputs as this would require C humification rates about three times greater than reported values (Paustian et al., 1997; Huggins et al., 1998b). These data, however, represent the combined influence of C inputs and decomposition on SOC. The C4derived SOC also had a linear response to C inputs (Fig. 1b) with slopes of 0.18 for CP and 0.14 for MP, representing C humification constants typical of many studies (Huggins et al., 1998b); The C3derived SOC, however, was not related to C3 inputs and had slopes not different from zero (Fig. 1c). While reduced tillage would be expected to slow decomposition compared with MP, SS appears to accelerate SOC decomposition [see Factor (b)], in addition to supplying less C inputs. Similar results are evident in the data of Havlin et al. (1990) in their comparisons of SS, sorghum-soybean and continuous sorghum sequences.
|
|
Factor (b): Soil Organic Carbon Decomposition Response to Carbon Quality
Continuous soybean reduced total SOC across all tillage treatments as compared with CP and NT under CC (Table 2, Fig. 1a). In addition, levels of C3 and C4derived SOC under SS were similar across tillage treatments and to fallow areas for the sampled soil profile (Table 2). In contrast, under CC, CP had 21% greater C4derived SOC and 34% more C3 derived SOC (despite no additions of C3C) than in MP. These data, in combination with Fig. 1c, show that soybean accelerated decomposition rates to the same extent as the greater soil disturbance and residue mixing with MP tillage or under fallow. The higher N and lower lignin concentrations found in residues and roots of legumes as compared with cereals (Buyanovsky and Wagner, 1986; Broder and Wagner, 1988) coupled with decreased aggregate stability [see Factor (d)] or saturation of physical protection mechanisms [see Factor (c)], would speed decomposition of C under soybean as compared to corn, particularly if soil N is limiting.
Factor (c): Tillage-Induced Redistribution of Carbon and Soil Organic Carbon Decomposition Response
Comparisons of C4 and C3 derived SOC depth-distributions show evidence of tillage-induced differences in C dynamics (Tables 4 and 5). Increases in surface SOC (07.5 cm) under reduced tillage and CC were negated by the inclusion of soybean. Under SS, no significant effects of NT or CP on C3 and C4derived SOC as compared with MP occurred in the surface 0 to 7.5 cm (Tables 4 and 5). Tillage influences on C4derived SOC (0- to 7.5-cm depth) only occurred in CC where NT had 17% greater SOC than MP, but comprised only 11% of the overall tillage difference in profile SOC (Tables 2 and 4). Tillage also had a relatively minor influence on surface C3derived SOC where significant increases only occurred in CS for CP and NT, compared to MP (Table 5).
|
|
Hassink and Whitemore, (1997) presented a relationship between the capacity of soil to physically protect SOC (X; saturation constant; g C kg1 soil) and clay (particles < 2 µm; g kg1) where: X = 21.1 + 0.0375 (clay). Using this equation, the protective capacity of clay-organic matter complexes for soil in this study would saturate at 33.5 g C kg1 soil. Given a soil bulk density of 1.08 g cm3, for the surface 0 to 7.5 cm, saturation would occur at 3.6 Mg C ha1 cm1, very close to measured amounts under MP or SS (Table 3). Consequently, physical protection of C from clay-SOC interactions could be near saturation, limiting further sequestration of surface SOC with SS regardless of tillage treatment.
Tillage effects on SOC were prominent at 7.5- to 30-cm depths, where C3 and C4derived SOC were often significantly greater in CP than MP, while NT was only greater than MP in the CC sequence (Tables 4 and 5). The comparatively greater SOC accumulation in the 7.5- to 30-cm depth of CP, compared with MP, across all crop sequences is likely a consequence of reduced SOC decomposition combined with higher concentrations of incorporated residues at 8- to 20-cm depths (Staricka et al., 1991). Interestingly, under SS, CP increased relative amounts of C4derived SOC at 7.5- to 30-cm depths as compared with NT and MP (Table 4). These data indicate that as surface SOC saturates physical protection mechanisms, shallow incorporation of soybean residue may limit adverse effects of soybean on SOC storage observed in both MP and NT.
In CC, C4derived SOC was 66% greater under NT than MP in the 30- to 45-cm depth, comprising 33% of the total profile difference in SOC (Tables 2 and 4). In addition, the C3derived SOC (3045 cm) under CC, tended to be greater with NT and CP as compared with MP (Table 5). In contrast, no significant tillage effects on SOC occurred with SS or CS at 30- to 45-cm depths (Tables 4 and 5). These data indicate that under CC, increases in root contributions and/or reduced SOC decomposition at depths below tillage were major contributors to greater SOC under NT as compared with MP. Furthermore, interactions of tillage with crop sequence were still apparent at the 30- to 45-cm depth as lower C3 and C4derived SOC occurred in SS and CS as compared with CC only under NT and CP (Tables 4 and 5).
Factor (d): Crop Effects on Soil Aggregation Properties
Treatment effects on soil aggregation were not evaluated; however, corn and soybean have contrasting influences on soil structure. Following corn, soil aggregate stability is often improved while soybean decreases aggregate size, stability and C content (Fahad et al., 1982; Bathke and Blake, 1984; McCracken et al., 1985; Ellsworth et al., 1991). Therefore, soybean would tend to counteract positive effects of less tillage disturbance on aggregate formation, turnover and soil C stabilization. A possible related factor is the greater and earlier soil water uptake by soybean at shallow depths as compared with corn (Allmaras et al., 1975a, 1975b). Enhanced drying near the soil surface followed by precipitation could induce greater macro-aggregate disruption and turnover due to more frequent dry-wet cycles (Denef et al., 2001).
Factor (e): Tillage and Crop Effects on Soil pH
Both CC and SS in the NT treatments had significantly lower soil pH than CP and MP throughout sampled depths (data not shown). Stratification of soil pH with increased acidification near the surface in no-tilled as compared with tilled treatments is not uncommon (Blevins et al., 1977; Dick, 1983; Rasmussen, 1999). In treatments with corn, decreased soil pH is primarily due to the use of ammonical fertilizers, while acidification under soybean is due to N2fixation and the accumulation of organic acids associated with surface residues. Reduced surface (07.5 cm) soil pH under SS with NT (pH of 6.4) may have enhanced biological activity and stimulated SOC decomposition as compared to surface soil pH of 7.1 to 7.6 as found with CP and MP with SS. In contrast, greater surface acidification in NT under CC (pH of 4.8) as compared to CP under CC (pH of 6.0) and MP under CC (pH of 7.2) would reduce rates of SOC decomposition (Rasmussen et al., 1998) and contribute to potential crop sequence by tillage interaction effects on SOC.
Carbon Modeling
Carbon Inputs
Estimated annual additions of C from crop shoot and root biomass (A) were not significantly affected by tillage treatment and averaged 6.55 Mg C ha1 for corn and 3.59 Mg C ha1 for soybean (Table 6). These values are within the range reported by other studies and sufficient to maintain SOC levels reported for annual cropping systems in the Corn Belt (Larson et al., 1972; Barber, 1979; Buyanovsky and Wagner, 1986; Huggins et al., 1998a, 1998b). Lack of tillage effects on crop yield in this study may have been due to high levels of SOC, which would buffer adverse treatment effects on soil nutrient cycling and physical properties.
|
Interestingly, the linear relationship between C inputs (A) and k developed for the Morrow Plots (soils with 27% clay) in Illinois (Huggins et al., 1998a) provided good estimates for k in this study. Under CC and MB at the Morrow Plots, k = 0.0009 + 0.0038A, gave an estimated k of 0.026 yr1 in this study. In the corn-oat-hay rotation (less tillage) k = 0.0002 + 0.0028A, and gave an estimated k of 0.019 yr1. The slightly lower estimates of k are due to greater quantities of labile SOC in this study. These data support the concept of expanding simple C models to include relationships between k and A.
The two-C-pool model Eq. [4] gave estimates of h derived from C4 sources that increased as soil disturbance decreased, ranging from 0.17 yr1 for MP to 0.23 yr1 for NT. In contrast, h derived from C3 sources decreased as soil disturbance decreased ranging from 0.16 yr1 for MP to 0.10 yr1 for CP and NT. The h values for CP and NT represent the lower bound placed on h based on the lignin content of soybean. The humification rate estimates were close to the range of 0.11 to 0.20 yr1 reported for cultivated systems (Larson et al., 1972; Barber, 1979, Buyanovsky et al., 1987; Huggins et al., 1998a, 1998b). The decrease in humification rates under SS for CP and NT as compared with MP, however, was unexpected and could arise from residue placement effects as previously discussed.
Turnover time in the fast pool (ttf) was more rapid in MP (averaging 1.21 yr) than either CP (averaging 1.27 yr) or NT (averaging 1.31 yr) for C4 and C3derived C and similar to reported values (Huggins et al., 1998b). In the slow C pool, tts for CP was the slowest (averaging 37.2 yr), NT intermediate (averaging 33.3 yr) with MP (averaging 27.3 yr) and fallow (averaging 29.0 yr) having the most rapid C turnover time. Soil C turnover time decreases as labile C pools increase (Huggins et al., 1998a). The tts are three to four times faster than for soils where SOM levels are relatively low (Huggins et al., 1998b), are representative of soils with large labile C pools, and illustrate the rapid depletion of labile C that can occur with changes in management.
Soil Organic Carbon Storage
In CC, annual C additions required to maintain estimated initial SOC (187 Mg C ha1) were 33 Mg C ha1 under MP, five times greater than achieved, and about two times greater than under CP or NT (Table 6). In SS, maintenance of initial SOC would require annual additions of 43 Mg C ha1, in all tillage treatments, 12 times greater than achieved. Consequently, soils with high levels of labile C were extremely vulnerable to SOC depletion when annually cropped, regardless of tillage, and would sustain SOC only with large additions of organic materials (e.g., animal manures).
Simulations of treatment effects on SOC from the initiation of the experiment and projected over a 30-yr period showed decreased levels of SOC for all treatments (Fig. 2 ). Longer simulations were not warranted as SOC dynamics would slow as labile C pools were depleted. After 30 yr, the SOC in fallow and MP SS was predicted to decline by 56% (105 Mg C ha1 or 3.5 Mg C ha1 yr1). The magnitude of these losses in SOC is similar to those that occurred following the conversion of native prairie to cultivated agriculture (Haas et al., 1957). The smallest SOC declines were predicted for CP and NT CC where initial SOC was depleted by 19 and 27%, respectively. Therefore, reduced tillage and high-yielding annual crops still resulted in substantial estimated losses in SOC over time.
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| NOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication July 14, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Senthilkumar, A. N. Kravchenko, and G. P. Robertson Topography Influences Management System Effects on Total Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 21, 2009; 73(6): 2059 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Boddey, C. P. Jantalia, B. J. R. Alves, and S. Urquiaga Comments on "No-Tillage and Soil-Profile Carbon Sequestration: An On-Farm Assessment" Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2009; 73(2): 688 - 689. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Blanco-Canqui and R. Lal Response to the 'Comments on "No-Tillage and Soil-Profile Carbon Sequestration: An On-Farm Assessment"' Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2009; 73(2): 690 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Angers and N. S. Eriksen-Hamel Full-Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta-Analysis Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1370 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Blanco-Canqui and R. Lal No-Tillage and Soil-Profile Carbon Sequestration: An On-Farm Assessment Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 693 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Purakayastha, D. R. Huggins, and J. L. Smith Carbon Sequestration in Native Prairie, Perennial Grass, No-Till, and Cultivated Palouse Silt Loam Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 15, 2008; 72(2): 534 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Lemke, Z. Zhong, C. A. Campbell, and R. Zentner Can Pulse Crops Play a Role in Mitigating Greenhouse Gases from North American Agriculture? Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1719 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||