SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Bulk density of three Glenelg soil samples from the 0.00- to 0.30-m depth plotted as a function of the applied stress. The data are for an undisturbed core sample (stars) and for two disturbed samples at different initial water contents (triangles and squares). See Table 1 and legends for initial conditions and additional information. The smooth lines result from nonlinear fits based on (a) Eq. [5], (b) Eq. [3] with n1 and n2 as in Eq. [8], (c) Eq. [3] with optimized n1 and n2 values, and (d) Eq. [1]. Optimized values for fits in (a), (b), and (d) are in Table 3, Table 2, and Table 1, respectively, and for (c) are b = –1.43, c = –1.26, cc = 0.00121, f = 0.753, and n2 = 0.165, with all other coefficients set to zero.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome