|
|
||||||||
Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557
dwj{at}cabnr.unr.edu
Bailey et al. (2005) found substantial declines in exchangeable base cations over a 30-yr period in soils of the Allegheny Plateau. They cannot attribute these changes to uptake and sequestration by vegetation and therefore ascribe the changes to "off-site leaching," and note that these changes are "consistent with studies that have suggested that acid deposition has induced significant losses of exchangeable base cation pools by hydrologic leaching" (p. 688). Close examination of Table 3 in their manuscript does not support this speculation, however. If the observed changes in exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+ are converted to kmolc ha1, the changes in Ca2+ + Mg2+ (M2+) that cannot be ascribed to vegetation uptake are 581.3, 184.0, 19.8, and 9.0 kmolc ha1 for the Dewdrop (DD), Fools creek (FC), Heart's Content (HC), and North Branch (NB) sites, respectively. On an annual basis (dividing by 30 yr), this amounts to 19.4, 6.1, 0.7, and 0.3 kmolc ha1 yr1, respectively. The values for DD and FC appear to be well beyond what could be attributed to total S and N deposition, equivalent to 310 and 98 kg ha1 yr1 of S or 271 and 86 kg ha1 yr1 of N. According to NADP maps, wet deposition of S for this region appears to be on the order of 12 kg ha1 yr1 as S (35 kg S ha1 yr1 as SO42) and
N deposition is on the order of 8 kg ha1 yr1 as N (21 kg ha1 yr1 as NO3 and 4.1 kg ha1 yr1 as NH4+) (NADP, 2003). Even if major N inputs occurred by dry deposition, it seems extremely unlikely that atmospheric deposition contributed substantially to the observed changes at DD and FC. Nor would natural leaching rates, typically on the order of 0.5 to 2 kmolc ha1 yr1 (Johnson and Lindberg, 1992), contribute this much to base cation leaching, unless limestone parent material is being weathered. The value for HC is within the range of what might be expected due to leaching processes, but the value for NB is in fact negative, implying that weathering exceeded base cation loss because soils did not lose as much base cations as were sequestered by vegetation.
Thus, the changes in soils documented by Bailey et al. (2005) are not consistent with what could be expected due to leaching or to acid deposition. Given their careful and extensive quality assurance program, the observed changes have to be accepted as real until proven otherwise, and further investigation is definitely warranted to uncover the causes of these changes.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. W. Johnson, D. E. Todd Jr., C. F. Trettin, and P. J. Mulholland Decadal Changes in Potassium, Calcium, and Magnesium in a Deciduous Forest Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 30, 2008; 72(6): 1795 - 1805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||