SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 June 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1162-1172 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2003.0312
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, M. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, M. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, I. A., Jr.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, M. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, I. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tropical Soils
Right arrow Pedology
Right arrow Soil Classification and Mapping
Right arrow Soil Mineralogy

Soil Mineralogy

Color Attributes and Mineralogical Characteristics, Evaluated by Radiometry, of Highly Weathered Tropical Soils

Mauricio P. F. Fontesa,* and Ildeu A. Carvalho, Jr.b

a Dep. de Solos, Univ. Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
b Faculdade Politécnica de Uberlândia, 38400-436, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil

* Corresponding author (mpfontes{at}ufv.br)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Highly weathered soils are important around the world. Determination of their observed colors and acquisition of spectral curves were used to study their mineralogy. Color was determined through visual comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts, and soils spectral characterization was made with an infrared intelligent spectroradiometer (IRIS) covering a spectral window from 300 to 3000 nm. The variables of color behaved differently among soils. The Munsell hue was related to hematite content and the hematite/goethite ratio (Hm/Gt), and the Munsell value to organic content of goethitic soils. The Munsell chroma was related to the presence of Fe oxides, giving an idea of relative amounts of either hematite or goethite. Regression equations relating color indices showed that the redness factor (RF) gave the highest determination coefficients to estimate hematite content and Hm/Gt, and reconfirmed that redness saturation occurs with increasing hematite amounts. The typical minerals of these soils showed characteristic absorption bands in their spectral curves. Absorption bands of 450 and 900 nm for Fe oxides, 2200 nm for kaolinite and 2280 for gibbsite, were distinctive features of the main minerals present. Organic matter decreased the intensity of reflectance for most soils and, under its influence, the characteristic bands of goethite practically disappeared while the ones for hematite, kaolinite, and gibbsite were attenuated. High amounts of hematite decreased the reflectance factor strongly as compared with the soil organic matter (SOM). Qualitative mineralogy of highly weathered soils was assessed by radiometry using measurements in the visible and near infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Abbreviations: BRF, bidirectional reflectance factor • HH, Humic Hapludox • Hm/Gt, hematite/goethite ratio • IRIS, infrared intelligent spectroradiometer • PT, Plinthaquox • RA, Rhodic Acrudox • RE, Rhodic Eutrudox • RF, redness factor • RH, Rhodic Hapludox • RR, redness rating • SOM, soil organic matter • TH, Typic Hapludox • XH, Xanthic Hapludox


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
IN DELINEATING DIFFERENCES between soils and in describing the characteristics of a soil profile, color is one of the most obvious and useful attributes for documenting these differences (Stoner et al., 1980a). Color is readily determined, and because it reflects differences in mineralogical, organic, and textural composition, it is very important in soil identification, particularly with the highly weathered soils. The organic matter and Fe oxides are the most important pigmenting agents for the color of highly weathered soils. These pigmenting agents act, in general, on a white background of the clay minerals, specially kaolinite and gibbsite. The Fe oxides appear mainly as goethite, which is responsible for the yellowish and brownish colors, and hematite, which imparts the red color. Good relationships between the color of Brazilian soils and the nature of the Fe oxides have been reported (Bigham et al., 1978; Kämpf & Schwertmann 1983a, 1983b; Fontes, 1988). As hematite presents a high pigmenting power, it is very effective in masking the yellow color of goethite. According to Scheffer et al. (1958), only 1.7% hematite could impart red color to a soil and merely 1% hematite would be enough to turn a yellow soil red (Resende, 1976).

The common method for determining this important soil property is a visual comparison between a given soil sample and the various color chips in an array of artificially produced Munsell colors (Munsell Color Company, 1975) arranged according to hue, value, and chroma (Stoner et al., 1980a). The use of the Munsell Soil Color Chart is practically mandatory in soil surveys, and the complete color profile should be presented for every soil examined and described in the field (Soil Survey Staff, 1960). The color attribute is widely used in the Brazilian Soil Classification System, where some classes of soils, particularly Latosols and Argisols, (approximately equivalent to Oxisols and Ultisols–Alfisols, respectively, in U.S. soil taxonomy) are defined and separated based on the field color they present (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, 1999).

On the basis of the Munsell notation, color indices were developed and are being used. Hurst (1977) introduced the concept of converting the Munsell Color notation to a single number by defining a variable, H*, to substitute for the Munsell hue and multiplying it by the ratio of value divided by chroma (H* x chroma/value). On that basis, Torrent et al. (1980) proposed the redness rating (RR) as a numerical index that could measure quantitatively the relationship between the redness and the hematite content of the soil. To make up this index, Munsell color was converted to RR according to the expression RR = H x C/V, where C and V are the numerical values of Munsell chroma and value, respectively, and H is 12.5 for hue 7.5R; 10 for 10R; 7.5 for 2.5YR; 5 for 5YR; 2.5 for 7.5YR and 0 for 10YR. Later, Torrent et al. (1983) used a slight variation in how to calculate the index using the formula RR = (10 – H) x C/V, where C and V are the same as defined before and H is the figure preceding YR in the Munsell hue. Kämpf & Schwertmann (1983a) and Fontes & Weed (1996) applied this index to highly weathered Brazilian soils, and they found significant correlations between RR and the Hm/Gt. Later, in an attempt to improve this index quantification, Santana (1984) proposed the use of the redness factor (RF). In this case, the index was defined as RF = (10 – H) + C/V using the same variables as defined before. Santana claims that this slight change in replacing the operator x by + improved the correlations between the index and either hematite content or the Hm/Gt.

Soil color is related to numerous other soil properties and precise quantitative reflectance measurements in the visible and near infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum often reveal textural, structural, mineralogical and/or other significant differences which may not be detectable by standard color observations (Stoner et al., 1980a). Quantitative measurements of visible as well infrared reflectance spectra of soils are possible using spectroradiometric techniques developed to simulate the geometry of remotely sensed data (Stoner and Baumgardner, 1981). Interest in remote sensing of earth resources emphasizes the need to accurately define soil spectral reflectance to aid in the interpretation of color aerial photography and multispectral imagery which, in turn, can be used with automatic data processing for the identification and subsequent mapping of soils (Matthews et al., 1973). To develop techniques whereby satellite sensors may be used most effectively in the preparation of field soil maps, land use capability maps, and soil productivity ratings as they relate to food production, a better understanding of the relationships existing between the spectral reflectance of soils and the soil parameters important in differentiating soils is required (Coleman et al., 1991).

Radiometric data on soil reflectance has been increasingly used for tropical soils in the last decade for various purposes, mainly as a basis for soil mapping and land use (Epiphanio et al., 1992; Valeriano et al., 1995; Formaggio et al., 1996; Demattê et al., 1998; Demattê & Garcia, 1999; Pizarro, 1999; Clemente et al., 2000). Demattê & Garcia (1999) and Clemente et al. (2000) showed that variations in the degree of weathering promoted alterations in soil properties which were detected by the reflectance intensity attributed mainly to the differences in mineralogy, OM content, texture, weatherable material, and differences in Fe forms. The organic matter content of soil has an important effect in the spectral characteristics of the soils (Clemente et al., 2000), and it has the capacity to decrease the reflectance of the soils along the whole spectral curve, particularly in the range of 400 to 2500 nm (Hoffer & Johannsen, 1969). It can mask features, peaks, and depressions provoked by the other components.

A highly weathered soil mineralogy is dominated by Fe oxides such as hematite, and goethite, kaolinite, and gibbsite (Fontes & Weed, 1991), each of which have a definite influence on the soil's reflectance behavior. The Fe oxides have a large influence on both form and intensity of the spectral curve of the soils. Goethite influences by producing bands in 435, 480, 650, and 917 nm and hematite imparts bands in 445, 530, 650, and 885 nm, making it difficult to differentiate between these two minerals (Beck et al., 1976). For other Fe oxides, such as magnetite and ilmenite, the reflectance is low in the whole visible and near infrared spectrum, and they are considered opaque minerals (Strens and Wood, 1979; Epiphanio et al., 1992).

Kaolinite presents moderate absorption bands at 1400 and 1900 nm, and strong absorption at 2200 nm (Matthews et al., 1973). Clark (1999) almost disregarded the 1900-nm band for kaolinite, saying that a mineral whose spectrum has a 1900-nm absorption band contains water, such as hectorite and halloysite, but a spectrum that contains a 1400-nm band without the 1900-nm band indicates that only hydroxyl is present, as in kaolinite. According to Madeira Netto (1996), the kaolinite spectrum has characteristically sharp features in the reflected infrared region, centered at 1400 and 2200 nm due to, respectively, the overtones of fundamental OH stretching and to combinations involving OH stretching and Al-OH bending modes. Gibbsite presents spectral features due to OH vibrations with the near and medium infrared spectra showing the stretching harmonic ({approx}1550 nm) and the combination of stretching and bending mode ({approx}2300 nm; Madeira Netto, 1996).

The objectives of this study were to investigate the soil color attributes of highly weathered soils and to analyze the influence of the soil color main determining factors, such as mineralogy and organic matter, on soil spectroradiometric behavior.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Samples of the most representative highly weathered soils from Minas Gerais State, Brazil, were collected. Thirteen profiles covering a wide range of climatic conditions and parent materials from the southern part of the State were selected and A, B, and A/B horizons were sampled. Brazilian soil classification, approximately equivalent to soil taxonomy (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993) and parent material of the samples can be seen in Table 1. Location of the sampling is shown in Fig. 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Brazilian soil classification, approximate equivalence to soil taxonomy and parent material of the samples.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Brazilian map showing Minas Gerais State and the location of the profiles sampled.

 
The colors were determined through visual comparison with the Munsell Soil Color Chart in <2-mm samples.

Redness rating (Torrent et al., 1983) was determined as

and the RF (Santana, 1984) as

where C and V are the numerical values of the Munsell chroma and value, respectively, and H is the figure preceding YR in the Munsell hue, so that it is 10 for 10R; 7.5 for 2.5YR; 5 for 5YR; 2.5 for 7.5YR, and 0 for 10YR.

Hematite and goethite contents (Table 2) were calculated by allocation (Resende et al., 1987) based on the procedure described by Jones (1981), using data from sulfuric acid digestion, from where the Fe2O3 content (Table 2) was determined (Carvalho, 2000). The sulfuric acid digestion was performed on the fine earth by extraction with H2SO4/H2O 1:1 by volume, heating until boiling under reflux, with subsequent cooling, dilution, and filtration. Fe2O3 was determined in the filtrate (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, 1997). The Hm/Gt (Table 2) was calculated using the expression


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Dry Munsell soil color; hematite and goethite contents; hematite/goethite ratio (Hm/Gt); Fe2O3, soil organic matter (SOM), kaolinite, and gibbsite contents; hue (H); redness rating (RR); and redness factor (RF) of the samples.

 
The SOM content was calculated from the total organic carbon determined by the Walkley-Black procedure, according to Nelson and Sommers (1982). The content of crystalline Fe oxides was determined by the dithionite-citrate (DC) treatment according to Coffin (1963). Kaolinite and gibbsite contents were determined by differential thermal analysis in Fe-removed samples submitted to constant heating from 25 to 650°C at a rate of 10° min–1.

Spectral Characterization
The spectral characterization of the soils was made using the sensor system Dual Field of View Mark IV IRIS (Epiphanio et al., 1992). The instrument covers a spectral window from 300 to 3000 nm, with spectral resolution of 2 nm between 300 to 1000 nm and 4 nm between 1000 and 3000 nm, in a continuous scan. The system is operated by a microcomputer programmed to measure and to store the data in memory, besides supplying output in diskettes.

The light source, a 600-W halogen lamp with noncollimated rays, was positioned over the reference plate and over the ground samples, previously spread in 10-cm-diam. Petri dishes, forming a 1-cm layer of soil. Detailed description of the instrument can be found elsewhere (Valeriano et al., 1995). The ratio of the flux reflected by an object under specified conditions of irradiation and viewing (soil sample) to that reflected by the ideal, completely reflecting, perfectly diffusing surface, identically irradiated and viewed (standard) was taken as the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) [Nicodemus et al. (1977), cited by Stoner et al., 1980b]. The restriction applied is that the measurements have to be made through negligibly small solid angles of illumination and viewing [Nicodemus et al. (1977), cited by Stoner et al., 1980b]. Then, the BRF was plotted against wavelength expressed in nanometers, which denotes the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum under consideration. Wavelengths used in this paper are in the visible (400–700 nm) and in the near-infrared (701–2500 nm) regions.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Munsell Hue, Value, and Chroma
The soil colors determined using the Munsell Soil Color Chart are presented in Table 2. The soils are arranged in such way that the first ones are the yellower soils with hues 5Y, 2.5Y, 10YR, and 7.5YR, and following them are the redder soils with hues 5YR, 2.5YR, and 10R (Table 2). The first six soils have no or low hematite content and predominance of goethite. This group of soils is also characterized by parent materials poorer in Fe content (Table 1), high SOM content (Table 2), and humid soil moisture regimes which favor the formation of goethite as compared with hematite (Kämpf & Schwertmann, 1983a; Schwertmann, 1985, 1988). The last seven soils are derived from mafic rocks, itabirite, and calcareous materials (Table 1). The soils derived from the mafic rocks and itabirite are characterized by high Fe2O3 contents, products of the weathering of rocks with high Fe release under tropical climates. These conditions favor the formation of ferrihydrite, a necessary precursor for hematite (Schwertmann, 1985, 1988), inducing the predominance of hematite as compared with goethite. The soil derived from the calcareous material contains a reasonable amount of Fe (Table 1) that, in conjunction with a high pH during the formation of this soil, favors the formation of hematite which predominates in terms of soil color.

The use of Munsell Soil Color Charts in field observations of Brazilian soils has shown that hues 5Y, 2.5Y, and 10YR indicate that the soil has goethite but does not have hematite; hues 7.5YR, 5YR, 2.5YR, and 10R indicate that the soil contains a mixture of goethite and hematite; and hues 2.5YR and 10R indicate that hematite predominates (Kämpf and Schwertmann, 1983b). This is in line with the reasoning of Torrent et al. (1980), who proposed the use of a variable H taken from the hue (Table 2). According to these authors, this variable, directly related to the Munsell hue, was chosen because it provides a good discrimination for pure goethite (10YR) and pure hematite (7.5R) determined colors. In fact, there was a strong relationship between H and the Hm/Gt ratio (r = 0.933, P = 0.01, N = 28) and also between H and hematite content (r = 0.837, P = 0.01, N = 28), which seems to support their affirmative.

The data of the Munsell values for each soil (Table 2) show that there are no large variations among horizons of the same soil when they are richer in hematite and, in most cases, the values are the same (Fig. 2 , hematitic soils). On the other hand, for the goethitic soils there is an increment of the Munsell value from the A to the B horizon, particularly for the soils with a higher organic matter content, as in the Typic Hapludox 2 (TH2) and Humic Hapludox (HH), where the increment in Munsell value was two units (Fig. 2, goethitic soils). The Munsell value, which relates directly to the darkest tonality of the color, is reduced in the soils by the presence of the organic matter (Scheinost & Schwertmann, 1999). Thus, the value can reflect the largest organic matter content of the surface horizons and because it has a weaker coloring power, goethite suffers a greater masking influence of the organic matter content in the surface horizon that translates into larger darkening. Hematite, due to its higher coloring power and darker color, does not suffer this interference as much. Therefore, in the hematitic soils, there is no clear differentiation between the A and B horizons reflected in the Munsell values. These data demonstrate why a misconception persisted for a long time that the tropical soils, in general, are low in organic matter. According to Greenland et al. (1992), the myth used to be stated as: "There is negligible organic matter in tropical soils..." The authors still say that the origins of the myth lie in the explorers' tales of the red color, showing little indication of the black or brown colors of the better soils of the temperate regions. In other words, the reason for this old misconception seems to be the fact that the hematitic soils, even with high organic matter content, do not show a clear color differentiation among A and B horizons of their actual content of organic matter.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Munsell values of A and B horizons of some goethitic and hematitic soil samples.

 
The Munsell chroma (Table 2), if used in conjunction with the hue, can give information about relative amounts of Fe oxides in highly weathered soils. The low chroma (2) for the Plinthaquox (PTB), with a hue of 2.5Y, means that the soil has a very low amount of goethite. The high chroma (8) for the B horizon of TH1B and TH2B and for HHB, which presents hues 10YR, 7.5YR, and 7.5YR, respectively, show that these soils have higher amounts of Fe oxides, predominantly as goethite. On the other hand, the high chroma (8) for the B horizon of the Rhodic Eutrudox 1 (RE1B), which hue is 2.5YR, means that this soil also has high amounts of Fe oxides, but predominantly as hematite. Working with simulated soil mixtures consisting of kaolinite and synthetic goethite and hematite, Fernandez and Schulze (1992) showed that a one-unit increase in chroma corresponded approximately to a doubling of the pigment content for the goethite as well the hematite pigments studied. The results obtained here did not fit exactly this model, but the same trend was observed. The higher the number of the Munsell chroma, the richer the soil in goethite or hematite, according to its hue.

Color Indices
Table 2 presents the values for the RR and the RF of the soils. The values ranged from 0 to 20, with smaller values for the more yellowish soils and higher values for the more reddish soils. The Rhodic Acrudox 2 showed maximum values in both indices.

Because of the high coloring power of hematite, numerical color indices such as the RR have been shown to correlate well with hematite content in soils (Childs et al., 1979; Torrent et al., 1980, 1983), therefore, the relationship between RR and RF and hematite was tested. Figure 3 shows the regression lines between RR, RF, and hematite content for all samples. The linear regressions yielded determination coefficients of 0.691 and 0.688, respectively, which indicate that the linear relationship of the data was not very strong. The relationship between these variables improved the R2 substantially (0.845 and 0.930) when a quadratic polynomial was tried, demonstrating a large improvement in the data fit. This behavior clearly demonstrates that a redness saturation occurred as hematite content increased, as described by Torrent et al. (1983), causing a lack of linearity between the variables, due to the pigmenting power of hematite.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Regression equations for the relationship between hematite content and (a) the redness rating (RR) and (b) the redness factor (RF).

 
From the Fe2O3 data and hematite contents (Table 2), the high content of Fe oxides can be observed, specifically hematite in the Rhodic Acrudox 2. Because there was a saturation of the red color for high hematite values, this soil was taken out from the computations, and Fig. 4 shows that, with the exclusion of this soil, the linear regressions increased their determination coefficients for both indices (R2 = 0.882 and 0.874 for RR and RF, respectively). The quadratic polynomial regressions performed differently for the indices. The RR gave a very similar determination coefficient also for the quadratic equation (R2 = 0.887), whereas the RF had its R2 improved with the fitting of the second-degree polynomial (R2 = 0.948). This means that the RF index could still capture the redness saturation caused by a hematite content of {approx}100 g kg–1, but the RR was not able to indicate the redness saturation, even for a hematite content up to {approx}140 g kg–1. Because of better determination coefficients for all regressions, the RF seems to be a more useful tool, as compared with RR, to predict hematite content for highly weathered soils. It is important to emphasize that this prediction is valid only up to a maximum of {approx}100 g kg–1 of hematite, which encompasses most of the highly weathered soils.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Regression equations for the relationship between hematite content and (a) redness rating (RR) and (b) redness factor (RF), excluding Rhodic Acrudox 2.

 
The relationship between RR and RF indices and the Hm/Gt was also tested for these soils. The determination coefficients for the linear relationships were R2 = 0.799 for the RR and R2 = 0.906 for RF (N = 28), and there was no improvement of the determination coefficients when the quadratic equations were evaluated. Because the Rhodic Acrudox 2 (RA2) caused redness saturation, its exclusion was also tested for the Hm/Gt ratio. Figure 5 shows that there was an improvement in the fit for both indices, meaning that a better prediction of the Hm/Gt ratio is expected for most highly weathered soils, except for the ones derived from itabirite. It can be seen that there, definitely, is a better fit of the data for the RF, which suggests that it should perform as a better predictor for the Hm/Gt ratio in these soils. Again, there was no improvement in the determination coefficients when the quadratic equations were used.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Regression equations for the relationship between hematite/goethite ratio and (a) the redness rating (RR) and (b) the redness factor (RF), excluding Rhodic Acrudox 2.

 
In practical terms, the amount of Fe extracted by DC treatment can be used as an estimate of the amount of crystalline Fe oxides, and the RF can be used to discriminate them in terms of relative amounts of hematite and goethite. Table 3 shows the results of the amounts of Fe determined with the DC treatment (Coffin, 1963), the Hm/Gt and the amounts of hematite and goethite calculated from the relationship RF = 0.861 + 12.61 Hm/Gt. The data obtained showed very good agreement with the data obtained by allocation (Table 2) and the correlation between the values obtained by these two procedures were as follows: for goethite r = 0.880 (P < 0.01) and for hematite r = 0.978 (P < 0.01), with N = 26 in both cases.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Iron extracted by the dithionite-citrate treatment (DC), hematite/goethite ratio (Hm/Gt), and hematite and goethite content of the samples.

 
Radiometric Characteristics of the Soils
Increased organic matter contents as a rule leads to decreased reflectance throughout the reflective spectrum (Stoner et al., 1980a). Thus, the spectral curves of B horizons were used to characterize the mineral components of these highly weathered soils. To facilitate the interpretation, the soils were separated into four different groups by their spectral curve behavior, which shows differences, mainly by variations in the Fe oxide mineralogy.

Group 1 is formed by the PTB, TH3B, and Xanthic Hapludox (XHB) (Fig. 6) . In spite of having a large variation for the reflectance intensities among the samples, the shapes of the spectral curves were very similar. There was an increase in the reflectance intensity up to 800 nm, and several reflectance absorption bands appeared along the curve at 1400, 1500, 1900, 2200, and 2280 nm, which are indicative of kaolinite and gibbsite (Matthews et al., 1973; Madeira Netto, 1996; Clark, 1999). The reflectance factor reached the value of 0.4 for the PTB sample, and it exceeded 0.6 for the THB sample. The PTB sample has very low goethite content and no hematite. The THB sample possesses low Fe oxide content ({approx}3.7% goethite), an intermediate amount of kaolinite, and higher amount of gibbsite (Table 2). The increase in the intensity of the reflectance, together with the clear change of slope of the spectral curve around 650 nm, seem to be linked to the presence of the goethite, while the sharpening of the bands at 1400, 1500, 2200, and 2280 nm are related to the presence of kaolinite and gibbsite in that sample. The band at 2280 nm, indicative of gibbsite, showed that the PTB sample is richer in that mineral. The XHB sample presents kaolinite, gibbsite, and goethite in the clay fraction (Table 2). Its spectral curve reflected that mineralogy, with very subtle concavities at 450 and 900 nm, which indicated the presence of small amounts of Fe oxides, and the slope of the line suggested that the Fe oxide is goethite. The 1400 and 2200 nm bands showed the presence of kaolinite, whereas the band at 2280 nm revealed the presence of gibbsite.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Spectroradiometric curves of the B horizons of the Typic Hapludox 3 (TH3B), Plinthaquox (PTB), and Xantic Hapludox (XHB). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
Group 2 comprises the TH1B, TH2B, and HHB samples (Fig. 7) . These are spectral curves that, together with the PTB sample, reach the greatest values of reflectance intensity, with maxima from 0.4 to 0.6. In general, the curves present reflectance bands as concavities at 450 nm and U-shaped bands at 900 nm, showing clearly the relative enrichment in Fe oxides. These samples have a less-accentuated concavity at 450 nm, and the absorption bands at 900 nm reach higher values, in the order of 0.4, of reflectance factor. All of these characteristics indicate larger goethite contents in those samples as compared with hematite. The TH2B and HHB samples show characteristic absorption bands at 1400 and 2200 nm, which indicate the presence of kaolinite, whereas the TH1B sample shows bands at 1500 and 2280 nm, demonstrating the presence of higher amounts of gibbsite.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Spectroradiometric curves of the B horizons of the Typic Hapludox 1 and 2 (TH1B and TH2B), and Humic Hapludox (HHB). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
Group 3 is constituted by the Rhodic Hapludox 1 and 2 (RH1B and RH2B) and RE1B samples (Fig. 8) . The curves of the Rhodic samples present a more accentuated concavity at 450 nm; the absorption band at 900 nm show reflectance of smaller intensity as compared with Group 2 samples; and the reflectance intensity values in the region of the 900 nm band are lower, in the order of 0.25 to 0.3. These are characteristics which indicate the predominance of hematite over goethite in those soils. The absorption bands at 1400 and 2200 nm show a consistent presence of kaolinite in RH1B and RH2B samples. The absorption bands at 1500 and 2280 nm indicate the same behavior as far as the presence of gibbsite in sample RE1B.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Spectroradiometric curves of the B horizons of the Rhodic Hapludox 1 and 2 (RH1B and RH2B), Rhodic Eutrudox 1 (RE1B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
Group 4, formed by the RH3B and two Rhodic Acrudox (RA1B, RA2B) soils derived from mafic rocks and itabirite, presented the smallest reflectance intensities, with the reflectance factor reaching a maximum of only about 0.2 (Fig. 9) . The high Fe oxide content, typical of these soils, reduced the reflectance intensity in the whole spectrum in agreement with Coleman et al. (1991). The curves presented concavities in the 450- to 550- and 750- to 1050-nm intervals, which are characteristics of the crystalline Fe oxides (Demattê & Garcia 1999). The U-shaped absorption band of 750 to 1050 nm, with the maximum absorption around 900 nm, can be related to the amount of Fe oxides (as can be seen by the presence of Rhodic Acrudox), the soil with the highest content of Fe oxides, in this group. The low reflectance in the whole spectrum for this group of soils can be also affected by the presence of other opaque minerals, such as magnetite or ilmenite, that might have contributed to this behavior (Epiphanio et al., 1992; Clemente et al., 2000). According to Strens and Wood (1979), the opaque but nonmetallic phases such as ilmenite and magnetite absorb strongly throughout the visible region, have dark powders, and display little dispersion of reflectance. Soils derived from mafic rocks and itabirite, well represented in this group, have been shown to possess magnetite or maghemite and ilmenite in their sand and silt fractions (Fontes et al., 2000).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Spectroradiometric curves of the B horizons of the Rhodic Acrudox 1 and 2 (RA1B and RA2B) and Rhodic Eutrudox 2 (RH3B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
Although the absorption bands for kaolinite and gibbsite were almost completely attenuated, small absorption bands at 2200 nm, distinctive of kaolinite, can be observed in RH3B and RA1B samples and at 2280 nm, indicative of gibbsite, in sample RA1B. None of these bands were present in the Rhodic Acrudox 2 (RA2B), which is predominantly formed by Fe oxides.

Organic Matter Influence
The influence of organic matter on the radiometric behavior of these soils was studied by comparing the A and B horizons of each sample analyzed. The comparison is possible because the Latosols are deep soils with virtually no weatherable primary minerals and very little differentiation among horizons (Resende et al., 1995). Therefore, the content and species of Fe oxides would be very similar for the A and B horizons, making a direct comparison less problematic as it could be for most soils.

The SOM has a common interference on the spectral curves of the minerals kaolinite and gibbsite, showing that, in general, SOM attenuated the absorption bands characteristic for these minerals. For the Fe oxides, important pigmenting agents in soils, the influence of the organic matter was different according to the type of mineral involved.

The soil sample from the TH3 has no hematite, a small amount of goethite, and a reasonable amount of SOM (Table 1). It has the highest reflectance factor in its B horizon (Fig. 10) , and in the A horizon the organic matter decreased the reflectance factor in almost all the entire spectrum. The organic matter attenuated the absorption bands for kaolinite and gibbsite at 1400, 2200, and 2280 nm.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Spectroradiometric curves of the A and B horizons of the Typic Hapludox 3 (TH3A and TH3B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
The HH sample has more organic matter and more goethite (Table 1), and it was sampled in the A, AB, and B horizons. The gradual increase in the influence of the organic matter mainly in the Fe oxide typical band of 900 nm, in the first part of the spectrum, can be easily seen (Fig. 11) . This is in line with findings by Matthews et al. (1973), who reported that organic matter and Fe oxides influenced more the reflectance in the 500- to 1200-nm range. The B horizon, which has very little SOM (8.0 g kg–1), shows a pronounced 900-nm absorption band, whereas the A horizon shows it as very attenuated.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Spectroradiometric curves of the A, AB, and B horizons of the Humic Hapludox (HHA, HHA/B, and HHB). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
The greatest influence of organic matter on goethite can be seen in the TH2 sample (Fig. 12) , where the reflectance factor is greatly decreased and the absorption bands on the A horizon are greatly attenuated in the whole spectrum. The 900-nm absorption band, characteristic of the Fe oxides, practically disappears, showing the dominance of the dark colors of organic matter over the yellow color of the goethite. This soil has the highest SOM content, which is 79.2 g kg–1.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. Spectroradiometric curves of A and B horizons of the Typic Hapludox 2 (TH2A and TH2B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
When hematite starts to predominate over goethite, as in the RH2 sample, the interaction of high amounts of organic matter (68.4 g kg–1) attenuate the absorption band to a lesser extent than the Fe oxides at 900 nm, and also decreases the reflectance factor in a smaller scale (Fig. 13) , when the spectra from A and B horizons are compared.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13. Spectroradiometric curves of the A and B horizons of the Rhodic Hapludox 2 (RH2A and RH2B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
With the predominance of hematite and lower amounts of organic matter (23.8 g kg–1), the patterns for the Rhodic Acrudox 1 (RA1) sample (Fig. 14) are basically the same for both A and B horizons. There is hardly any decrease in the reflectance factor, and almost no attenuation of the absorption bands, including the 900 nm of the Fe oxides.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14. Spectroradiometric curves of the A and B horizons of the Rhodic Acrudox 1 (RA1A and RA1B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
And finally, when there is a combination of very high amounts of hematite (277 g kg–1) and low amounts of organic matter (15.9 g kg–1), as in the Rhodic Acrudox 2 (RA2), the behavior of the spectral curves is reversed (Fig. 15) . The pattern with the higher reflectance is the one from the A horizon, which has a little more organic matter, and there is no interference in the 900-nm absorption band for the Fe oxides. This result literally demonstrates the very high coloring effect of the hematite and its power of masking the color of the organic matter.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15. Spectroradiometric curves of the A and B horizons of the Rhodic Acrudox 2 (RA1A and RA2B). BRF = bidirectional reflectance factor.

 
The results obtained demonstrate that radiometric spectral curves of soils can be useful instruments in qualitative inference of mineralogical components of highly weathered soils. The overall reflectance behavior and specific absorption bands of the main minerals of the clay fraction of these soils, namely, hematite, goethite, kaolinite, and gibbsite, can become a good auxiliary technique to reveal the mineralogy of these important soils. The next step would be the quantitative evaluation of these minerals and, for that purpose, more studies are being planned.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The variables that comprise conventional soil color notation behaved differently in their relationship with soil characteristics. The Munsell hue had a significant relationship with hematite content and the Hm/Gt ratio. The Munsell value was related directly to the amount of organic matter in the more goethitic soils, but not in the hematitic ones. The Munsell chroma was related to the amount of Fe oxides, and in conjunction with the hue, chroma was able to give an idea of the relative amounts of hematite or goethite present in the soil.

Numerical indices based on the Munsell notation showed a good relationship with soil characteristics. The RR can be a good predictor of hematite contents, whereas the RF can be useful to predict the Hm/Gt in highly weathered soils, in both cases, for soils containing less than {approx}100 g kg–1 of hematite. This is because of the redness saturation phenomenon that appears as hematite content increases to higher levels.

The qualitative mineralogy of highly weathered soils can be evaluated by radiometry using measurements in the visible and near-infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Hematite and goethite, the main forms of Fe oxide, have characteristic concavities at about 450 and 900 nm, and hematite decreases whereas goethite increases soil reflectance, allowing for a distinction between them. Kaolinite has strong absorption bands at 1400 and 2200 nm and can be distinguished from gibbsite by the absorption bands at 1500 and 2280 nm.

Organic matter decreased the reflectance intensity for most soils, attenuating the typical absorption bands of the minerals kaolinite and gibbsite. For the Fe oxides, organic matter's influence depended on the type of mineral. For goethite, organic matter decreased the reflectance factor and attenuated the absorption bands for all spectrum more strongly than it did for hematite. High amounts of hematite even reversed this behavior, showing the high coloring power of this Fe oxide.

Spectral curves can be a good auxiliary tool to study the mineralogy of highly weathered soils, typical of the tropical climates.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research, a part of the project "Carbon dynamics in Latosols of Minas Gerais State," was supported by an award of FAPEMIG–Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, through the fellowship CAG-2260/96. Thanks are extended to the associate editor and the anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the manuscript.

Received for publication December 2, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
N. Richter, T. Jarmer, S. Chabrillat, C. Oyonarte, P. Hostert, and H. Kaufmann
Free Iron Oxide Determination in Mediterranean Soils using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 72 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, M. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, M. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, I. A., Jr.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, M. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, I. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tropical Soils
Right arrow Pedology
Right arrow Soil Classification and Mapping
Right arrow Soil Mineralogy


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome