|
|
||||||||
Building 203, E-133, Environmental Research Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439-4843
* Corresponding author (vallison{at}anl.gov)
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: GC, gas chromatography PLFA, phospholipid fatty acid RA, reciprocal averaging
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a previous study, we found variability in PLFA composition among replicates, suggesting small-scale heterogeneity may be obscuring broader patterns. This problem could potentially be resolved by homogenizing soils before extraction. In this paper, we examined the effect of pretreatment effects on microbial community composition by assessing relative abundance of PLFAs. Two soils were used: a remnant prairie soil with high organic matter content and microbial biomass, and a restored prairie soil with much lower microbial biomass. We predicted that larger sample sizes and grinding would reduce variability in community composition, assessed as the relative abundance of signature PLFAs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three soil cores (4.8 cm in diameter by 10 cm deep) were taken at each site, approximately 10 m apart, in July 2002 and frozen within 5 h at 20°C pending further processing. Cores were defrosted overnight in a refrigerator, weighed, and then passed through an 8-mm sieve and then a 2-mm sieve to remove roots and break up large soil aggregates. Soil was freeze-dried (50°C, 80 x 103 Mbar) in a Labconco Freezone 4.5 freeze drier (Labconco, Kansas City, MO). Any visible fine roots were removed from dry soil by hand picking. The study was a 2 x 5 factorial completely randomized design, with two grinding treatments (ground and control, unground), and five soil sample size treatments (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 g), with three replicates. Grinding was for 30 s at room temperature in a Spex mill (Spex-Certiprep, Metucher, NJ). These treatments were applied to soil from both sites.
Soil Analyses
Soil C concentrations were analyzed using a Carlo Erba NC2000 elemental analyzer (Fisons Instruments, Milan, Italy), and averaged 3.8 ± 0.5% (SD) at the restored site and 10.1 ± 2.1% (SD) by weight at the remnant site.
Lipids were extracted from freeze-dried soil in a single-phase mixture of chloroform, methanol, and phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) in a ratio of 1:2:0.8, by an adaptation of the method described by Bligh and Dyer (1959). After 2 h, water and chloroform were added to separate the mixture into polar and nonpolar fractions, and total lipids were extracted from the nonpolar chloroform phase. The PLFAs were separated from other lipid classes by using silicic acid column chromatography, and methylated by using an adaptation of the mild-alkaline analysis described by White et al. (1979).
Before analysis, PLFAs were thawed and dissolved in 1 mL of hexane. Phospholipid fatty acid separation was by high-resolution fused-silica capillary gas chromatography (GC), using a HP5890 GC, with an HP7673 autosampler (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). A 25-m HP-Ultra 2 column was used, with hydrogen as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 0.8 mL min1. A 1-µL splitless injection was made for each sample, with the inlet temperature set at 290°C. The oven temperature was held at 60°C for 2 min, increased at 10°C min1 to 150°C, and then increased at 3°C min1 to 250°C and held for 5 min. Detection of PLFAs was by flame ionization at 320°C.
Phospholipid fatty acids were identified by retention time in comparison with known standards, and quantified using a bacterial quantitative standard (Catalog no. 1114; Matreya, State College, PA). Phospholipid fatty acids for which no quantitative standard peak was available were quantified by using the response factor for fatty acid 15:0. We chose to use an external rather than internal standard both to determine the degree to which PLFA response factors vary, and whether 19:0 (a commonly used internal standard) was present in samples. Although the absence of an internal standard can potentially lead to variation due to differential injection and evaporation, samples were run in randomized order. In addition, we find very consistent peak areas: over 20 injections, we found that the standard deviation of peak area was less than 3.5% of the mean (results not shown).
Phospholipid fatty acid nomenclature follows Tunlid and White (1992). Briefly, PLFAs are identified by C chain length, the number of double bonds, the position of the double bond from the methyl end of the atom, and the orientation (cis or trans) about the double bond. For example, the PLFA 16:1
5c (an indicator of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in some systems) is 16 carbons long, with one double bond positioned five carbons from the methyl end of the PLFA, and cis orientation about that double bond.
Data Analysis
Soil microbial community composition was assessed by using a reciprocal averaging (RA) ordination (McCune and Mefford, 1999) on the relative abundances of the 10 dominant fatty acids. Data from all soil sample sizes were used in this and subsequent analyses. Outliers were identified (more than 2.0 SD from the mean), but data did not require transformation to meet assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. The effect of grinding on abundance of individual fatty acids was also assessed, using a pooled variance t test for each fatty acid at each site (Systat 10; SPSS, 2000). Because of the large number of comparisons made, differences in this analysis were considered significant at p
0.005.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6,9, 18:1
9c, and 18:1
7c (Fig. 1B).
|
When assessed as actual rather than relative abundance, the restored soil (Fig. 2A) was dominated by the fatty acids 16:0, 16:1
5c, and 18:1
9c while the remnant prairie soil was dominated by 16:0 and 18:1
9c (Fig. 2B). In the restored soil, grinding significantly increased abundance of 18:1
9c (t = 4.3564, p
0.0002), 18:2
6,9 (t = 3.8721, p
0.0006), and 18:1
7c (t = 3.1928, p
0.0035). In the remnant soil, grinding increased the abundance of 18:1
9c (t = 5.3219, p
0.0001), 18:2
6,9 (t = 8.3961, p
0.0001), and 18:1
7c (t = 5.7660, p
0.0001), and also significantly increased the abundance of 16:0 (t = 3.5782, p
0.0013) and had a marginally significant positive effect on abundance of 16:1
5c (t = 3.0237, p
0.0053).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6,9c and 18:1
9c (Zelles, 1997), and also of 18:1
7c (Fig. 1B). Although PLFA 18:1
7c is found in high concentrations in prokaryotes (Zelles, 1997), it is also found in eukaryotes including mycorrhizal fungi (Olsson et al., 1995).
We have two hypotheses to explain an increase in eukaryotic PLFAs: (i) grinding releases the fatty acids from fine roots in soil, and (ii) grinding more effectively exposes the interior surfaces of fungi to extraction. There is some evidence that this may occur. Olsson and Johansen (2000) found that ball milling before extraction increased the amount of PLFA 16:1
5c extracted from fungal hyphae by more than 200% relative to extraction from unmilled freeze-dried tissue. Similarly, we found that PLFA 16:1
5c was significantly increased by grinding at the remnant site (Fig. 2B). In addition, while 18:1
7c is generally regarded as a bacterial PLFA (Frostegård et al., 1993; Zelles, 1997), it is also present in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Olsson et al., 1995), and thus the increase in this PLFA may be due to increased extraction from fungi.
Although arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) comprise a substantial portion of the microbial biomass at this site (Miller et al., 1995), grinding increased other eukaryotic PLFAs to a greater degree than it increased PLFA 16:1
5c (Fig. 2). This suggests that the increase in eukaryotic signatures is at least partly due to extraction from fine roots, in spite of careful hand removal of all visible roots before grinding. Although Schutter and Dick (2001) found that addition of plant residues had little effect on fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles, they incorporated oven-dried plant tissue into soil. We have found that oven-drying greatly reduces the amount of PLFA extracted (unpublished data, 2004), and suggest that viable plant tissue does have the potential to influence the PLFA profile. In a previous study, Petersen and Klug (1994) found that passing soil through a 2-mm sieve decreased the fungal signature 18:2
6,9, and suggest this was the result of damage to fungal hyphae. An alternative possibility is that sieving reduced the eukaryotic signature by removing roots from the soil.
Although the effect of grinding is substantially lower than that of site (Axis 1 explains 86% of the variation, while Axis 2 explains 8%), we nonetheless demonstrate that soil pretreatment significantly affects PLFA profiles of soils. We suggest that whether or not soils are ground before PLFA extraction depends on the rooting densities at a given site. In soils with high root densities, grinding may obscure changes in the microbial community by exaggerating the eukaryotic signal. In soils with low rooting densities, grinding will ensure that the eukaryotic signal is not underestimated.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| NOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication March 18, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. White and C. W. Rice Tillage Effects on Microbial and Carbon Dynamics during Plant Residue Decomposition Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 138 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||