SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by West, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, J. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by West, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Soil Mineralogy
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:1452-1460 (2004).
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

DIVISION S-9—SOIL MINERALOGY

Kaolinite, Halloysite, and Iron Oxide Influence on Physical Behavior of Formulated Soils

S. L. Westa, G. N. Whitea, Y. Dengb, K. J. McInnesa, A. S. R. Juoa and J. B. Dixona,*

a Soil & Crop Sciences Dep., Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
b Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA, 99164

* Corresponding author (j-dixon{at}tamu.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Soils of some tropical regions have low bulk density, high permeability, and resistance to erosion even under high rainfall. Soils with this combination of characteristics frequently contain halloysite and Fe oxides. We hypothesized that platy kaolinite particles form a more compact mass than tubular halloysite particles, and that Fe oxides promote porous aggregation. To test this hypothesis the settling densities were determined for soil analogs constructed of kaolinite and halloysite clays with ferrihydrite and nonionic, anionic, and cationic organic surfactants as organic matter proxies. The samples were mixed in water and compacted by centrifugation. The hydraulic conductivity of each kaolinite- and halloysite-based mixture was determined with a falling head permeameter. Halloysite samples had lower bulk densities than kaolinite samples with the same centrifugation. The addition of ferrihydrite decreased bulk density of sets of both mineral mixtures. Numerous small particles of ferrihydrite adhered to halloysite tubes in contrast to larger oxide masses formed among clean kaolinite plates, as shown in transmission electron micrographs. The greater frequency of ferrihydrite particles associated with halloysite than kaolinite crystals provided more sites for inter-particle bonding and clay aggregation. Cationic and neutral organic polymers decreased the bulk density of halloysite soil analogs. The kaolinite analog response to polymer treatment varied. Anionic polymers appeared to increase the bulk density of both mineral mixtures that is attributed to increased particle dispersion. These results support the hypothesis that clay morphology and bonding agents influence soil bulk density and hydraulic conductivity of fabricated clay soils.

Abbreviations: Db, bulk density • FH, ferrihydrite • LBNL, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory • PAM, polyacrylamide • SEM, scanning electron microscope • TEM, transmission electron microscope • XRD, X-ray diffraction


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
UNDERSTANDING physical behavior of soil is essential to soil utilization and taxonomy. Jenny (1941) presented the five soil-forming factors—time, parent material, climate, organisms, and man, a step toward quantifying soil properties and behavior. Soil taxonomy went further by utilizing quantitative measures of variables such as temperature, cation-exchange capacity, particle-size distribution, base saturation, and clay mineralogy to characterize soils (USDA soil classification system, Soil Science Society of America, 2001). The continued progress of soil science and technology requires quantitative measures and understanding of the way soil particles interact. It is very difficult to isolate the contribution of soil constituents in the natural materials, thus soil behavior was addressed by utilizing fabricated soil.

This paper approaches soil structure development from the constructive side by assembling soil constituents and measuring their influence on two important properties: bulk density (Db) and hydraulic conductivity. Investigating avenues for improving soil structure is a timely pursuit. There are extensive areas of soils low in organic matter and large quantities of mine spoils (Senkayi et al., 1983) where development of soil structure would benefit long-term productivity. At the same time, there are abundant quantities of soil aggregating agents such as organic municipal wastes (Clapp et al., 1994) and wastes from confined feeding of farm animals.

By employing only the clay fraction (i.e., excluding silt and sand), information can be gained on the influence of aggregating agents (Fe oxide and organic substances) in formulated soils. Ferrihydrite (FH) was used as a representative of the Fe oxides because it is the most reactive Fe oxide. It has a very high surface area, a positive charge at most soil pHs (Bartoli et al., 1992), a low bulk density, and abundant water retention (2.70 kg kg–1) in natural occurrences (Wells and Childs, 1988). Ferrihydrite has been reported in many soil environments and seems to be a precursor for the formation of hematite (Allen and Hajek, 1989; Schwertmann and Taylor, 1989). Also, FH can be managed in the field by changing cultural practices and controlling seasonal water content (e.g., paddy versus dryland crops) (Wang et al., 1993). Ferrihydrite is the first Fe oxide to form under some conditions and therefore precipitates in soils undergoing sudden changes in redox potential. Polyacrylamides (PAMs) were utilized as surrogates for soil organic matter because they can improve soil aggregation (Sojka et al., 1998) and are available in different ionic forms.

The presence of halloysite in soils impacts soil properties and behavior because the particles usually are cylinders, spheres, or cup-shaped and cannot be packed as densely as minerals such as platy kaolinite. Many strongly weathered soils (e.g., Ultisols) from tropical regions have bulk densities ranging from 0.6 to 1.0 g cm–3, whereas soils from temperate climates have bulk densities from 1.2 to 2.0 g cm–3 (Wesch, 1999; Brady, 1990). Bulk densities of halloysite clay mixed with foundry molding sands at various water contents were lower than such mixtures containing kaolinite (Grim, 1962). Low bulk densities are associated with high porosity.

Movement of water through natural soil is complex because of the wide range of pore sizes and the multiple sampling and statistical methods required to determine patterns of water movement (Schwartz et al., 1999). In this study, we chose to use homogenous starting materials of clay size to investigate the hydraulic conductivity of the finer pores in fabricated soils. Water movement in soils is most rapid where the tortuousity is least, assuming equal pore size. Small halloysite particles produce a less tortuous flow path than the wider kaolinite flakes that are prone to be oriented horizontally. As noted earlier, smooth, platy particles of kaolinite clay are expected to settle into a higher Db mass than do tubular particles of halloysite that have a calculated Db of 90.7% of the intrinsic density. In addition, Fe oxides are hypothesized to promote porous aggregates because of particle roughness, water content, and inter-particle bonding. As a result, tubular clay particles and Fe oxides increase the porosity, and therefore, the permeability of the soils. Organic matter contributes to aggregation in soils (Brady and Weil, 1999). Thus, the objectives of this research were to quantify the influence of clay morphology, FH, and PAMs on Db and/or hydraulic conductivity in fabricated clay soils.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Kaolinite was obtained from a dry commercial kaolin sample from the J.M. Huber Co., Macon, GA. Halloysite was obtained from a small deposit on the Langley farm near, Camp Hill, AL in 1977. The halloysite sample was mostly dehydrated; the 0.7/1.0 nm peak height ratio was 3:1 when Mg saturated and 3:2 when K saturated. The structural layers in fully hydrated halloysite exhibit disordered stacking in both a and b directions (Brindley and Robinson, 1946). The curvature of halloysite is a relatively permanent property under a wide range of conditions. Cross-sectional views of tubular halloysite exhibit curvature (Dixon and McKee, 1974).

Preparation of Formulated Soils
Kaolinite and halloysite of clay-size, <2µm were separated from the sand and silt fractions where quartz and other contaminants tend to be concentrated. Ten grams of each whole mineral sample was placed into a 250-mL centrifuge bottle, 200 mL of 0.05 M sodium chloride was added, and the sample then was agitated on a mechanical shaker for at least 24 h. After the sample was removed from the shaker, it was centrifuged at 283 x g (1000 rpm) for 5 min, and the clear supernatant was decanted off. To remove the sand, 200 mL of pH 10 Na2CO3 was added to the bottle, the sample was resuspended by manual shaking, and then allowed to settle for a few minutes. The suspended material (silt and clay) was then poured through a 45 µm (325-mesh) sieve into a 4-L beaker. The addition of pH 10 Na2CO3 was repeated until the supernatant was clear. An ultrasonic probe was utilized to disperse the particles during each washing cycle.

The suspension that passed through the sieve was then poured into 250-mL centrifuge bottles and centrifuged at 159 x g (750 rpm) for 3.2 min according to Stokes law. The supernatant, which contained the clay fraction, was decanted into a 4-L beaker. This process was repeated until all of the clay/silt mixture was separated, and then the samples were washed several times with pH 10 Na2CO3 until clay no longer appeared in the supernatant.

To flocculate the clay fraction, a minimum amount of 0.5 M MgCl2 was added to the beakers to obtain visual flocculation (Kunze and Dixon, 1986). After the clay had settled out of the solution, the clear supernatant was decanted; the remaining clay suspension was poured into 250-mL centrifuge bottles, and centrifuged at 283 x g (1000 rpm) for 5 min. Then the samples were rinsed several times with distilled water to remove the MgCl2. The halloysite samples were rinsed eight times and the kaolinite samples were rinsed three times until the clay began to disperse.

The Fe oxide, FH, was synthesized from potassium hydroxide and ferric nitrate and was estimated to have a surface area of 200 to 300 m2 g–1 (Schwertmann and Cornell, 1991).

Three commercial PAM surfactants were used to simulate soil organic matter. The surfactants used included one cationic (Magnifloc 494C), one anionic (Magnifloc 836A), and one uncharged (Magnifloc 903N) from Cytec Industries, West Patterson, NJ. Three concentrations of each surfactant solution were made (2.5, 0.25, and 0.025 g L–1).

Bulk Density
For the Db experiments, 1 g of clay was placed in a 250-mL centrifuge bottle, and FH was added. The amount of FH added constituted 0, 1, 10, 20, 25, and 30% of the total mixture. Two replicates were made for both halloysite and kaolinite for the 0, 1, and 10% concentrations. However, only one sample for each clay mineral was made with 20, 25, and 30% concentrations of FH.

The pH of each sample was checked; if the pH was below 6.0, 1% (v/v) sodium carbonate was added to raise the pH to approximately 7. These mixtures were brought to 100 mL total volume by adding distilled water, homogenized by shaking, and then transferred to 40-mL centrifuge tubes. They were then centrifuged for 10-min intervals at different centrifugation speeds (11 to 5519 x g, 200 to 4400 rpm) until they obtained a constant volume of clay (Jackson, 1969). After each centrifugation, the compaction depth of the clays was measured and recorded. These clay depths and the tube diameters were used to calculate Db.


Two replicates were made for both halloysite and kaolinite with each concentration of organic surfactant. The same method used with the FH experiments was used for these mixtures, except the pH was not checked and brought up to 7.0. After the experiments were completed, the pH of the samples was determined. Values ranged from 5.5 to 5.8 for halloysite samples, and from 4.7 to 6.5 for the kaolinite samples.

Hydraulic Conductivity
Hydraulic conductivity was measured for halloysite and kaolinite samples with 0, 10, and 30% FH (four replicates for each mixture) using the falling-head method with a novel dual purpose centrifuge tube and leaching column constructed from Lexan plastic tubing closed with a snap-cap (Kimble, Vineland, NJ augmented with Parafilm, Chicago, IL [Fig. 1b]). In this case a circular piece of Fisher P5 filter paper (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) was added to the bottom of the tube and the closure was replaced (Fig. 1b). The tube was protected from deformation from the force of gravity by surrounding it with water in each centrifuge trunnion cup. Approximately 2 g of the dispersed sample was poured into each tube, and then centrifuged three times at 103 x g for 30 min to form a solid plug. Once the plug height reached equilibrium, the cap was carefully removed and cheesecloth was secured over the end to hold the filter paper in place.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Falling head apparatus for hydraulic conductivity determination (Klute and Dirksen, 1986) with section of Lexan plastic tube with clay plug at the bottom and (b) snap-cap employed to convert leaching column to centrifuge tube.

 
The columns were then placed in the falling head permeameter (Fig. 1). Readings of the change in hydraulic head across the sample were recorded and later used to calculate the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the samples, using the formula:

where Ks is the hydraulic conductivity (cm s–1), a is the cross-sectional area of the standpipe (cm2), L is the length of the clay plug (soil sample) (cm), A is the cross-sectional area of the sample (cm2), t is time (s), H1 is initial height of the hydraulic head (cm), and H2 is final height of the hydraulic head (cm). The diameter of the soil sample was 1.5 cm, and the length ranged from 1.95 to 2.95 cm for the kaolinite samples, and 1.4 to 2.75 cm for the halloysite samples. The diameter of the standpipe was 0.227 cm.

After conducting the experiment, the caps were replaced on the columns, and the samples were centrifuged three times at 1029 x g for 30 min until an equilibrium height had been reached; hydraulic conductivity data were collected again. This same procedure was repeated to collect data for the samples run at 1642 x g. After all desired data were collected, the samples were placed in a 60°C oven. Once dry, the mass of each sample was measured, and the data were used to calculate bulk density. Additionally, pH of the samples was measured by rehydrating the samples with a 3:1 water/sample ratio. Values ranged from 4.4 to 6.5 for the kaolinite samples, and from 4.5 to 5.6 for the halloysite samples (samples with more FH had lower pHs).

Electron Microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on air-dried material from the centrifuge tubes after the hydraulic conductivity was determined. Broken surfaces were examined on a JEOL 6400 (JEOL [U.S.A.] Inc., Peabody, MA) after adhesion to an Al sample stub using conductive carbon paint. The SEM micrographs were obtained at 20 KeV at a working distance of 12 mm.

The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on dispersed clay samples taken before compaction by centrifugation. The samples were drop mounted on Type A silicon monoxide films on copper grids (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA) except for the sample shown in Fig. 5a that was on a holey C film on a Cu grid. All TEM examinations were performed with a JEOL 2010 microscope (JEOL [U.S.A.] Inc., Peabody, MA) at 200 KeV.



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Halloysite transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrographs with ferrihydrite (FH) treatments: (a) 0% FH, (b) 10% FH, (c) 20% FH, and (d) 30% FH.

 
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were made by the t test at the 0.05 significance level of paired observations with unequal variance examining the effect of centrifugal force and percentage of FH on the bulk density and hydraulic conductivity. Further comparisons are shown in the graphical presentations later. Hydraulic conductivity is increased with the addition of 10% FH for halloysite but not for kaolinite. Addition of 30% FH removes any increase in hydraulic conductivity. Bulk density is significantly reduced by the addition of FH for both minerals but the reduction is not statistically significant in most cases for the halloysite samples. Addition of more than 10% FH shows no effects on bulk density. Centrifugal force did not significantly affect hydraulic conductivity but it did affect bulk density of kaolinite with no added FH.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characteristic X-ray diffraction (XRD) curves for the kaolinite and halloysite samples employed show no evidence of contaminants (Fig. 2). Comparison of the 0.7- and 1-nm peaks for halloysite room temperature and after heating to 300°C suggests that the halloysite was approximately 35% hydrated (Fig. 2b). The smearing of the 1.0-nm peak when glycerol solvated and small changes between XRD patterns of the room temperature treatments suggest the possibility of permanent charge on the halloysite. Yet an attempt to re-expand the halloysite after 300°C heating was not successful.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction curves for (a) kaolinite and (b) halloysite utilized for bulk density and hydraulic conductivity investigations.

 
Halloysite has both internal and external porosity that influences its bulk density. To assess the magnitude of the internal pores the internal and external diameter of 102 halloysite tubes were measured and an internal void volume of 5% was calculated (data not shown). The 0.7-nm peak for kaolinite is three times as intense as for halloysite dehydrated at 300°C indicating much greater XRD sensitivity to the platy mineral.

Particle Morphology Shown by Scanning Electron Micrographs
The platy kaolinite particles are visible in the scanning electron micrographs of samples that had been compacted by centrifugation and dried (Fig. 3a). Many sizes of particles are visible and the thicker particles are prominent in edge view in the bottom center of the field. Also, many small plates are incongruously situated on the edges of the larger and thicker ones. The particles appear to be randomly oriented and some large pores are visible. The many thin particles about a micrometer across are easily overlooked on the thick stacks. The many stacks of kaolinite plates raise the question of their reassembly during compaction.



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscope micrographs of (a) kaolinite and (b) halloysite fractionated clay samples.

 
Halloysite tubes are only a fraction of a micrometer in diameter and up to a few micrometers in length (Fig. 3b). Tubes of various lengths dominate the micrograph. It is difficult to assess relative proportions because of the irregular surface shown and the possibility of excessive brightness caused by bleeding off charge from particle terminations. The average breadth of clay particles is distinctly less for the halloysite than for kaolinite, as is visible in SEMs.

Particle Morphology Shown by Transmission Electron Micrographs
The transmission electron micrographs of both minerals show how smooth and well dispersed the clay particles were (Fig. 4a and 5a). The contrasting morphology of the two minerals limits geometric comparison. Kaolinite plates are thin and the clean abrupt edges indicate the lack of dense particles of Fe oxide (Fig. 4a). Also, they are euhedral six-sided plates that exhibit uniform absorbance of the electron beam indicating high sample purity. Halloysite, on the other hand, is generally tubular, but the tubes vary in length, thickness, and shape of the terminations. Kaolinite and halloysite samples containing added FH (Fig. 4 and 5) had many dark granular particles of FH that were precipitated in solution and added as colloids that had never been dried. The FH is more opaque than the layer silicates because of its higher absorbance in the electron beam. The interstitial space is largely free of FH in samples of both minerals suggesting association of the oxide particles with the layer silicates before drying from water suspension on the support membrane.



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Kaolinite transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrographs with ferrihydrite (FH) treatments: (a) 0% FH, (b) 10% FH, (c) 20% FH, and (d) 30% FH.

 
Kaolinite–Ferrihydrite Association
The presence of FH (Fig. 4b) is evident by the dark irregular masses at 1, 2, and 3. The surfaces and edges of most of the kaolinite plates are clean and free of FH. Interstitial space is clean like the adjacent control sample. Although the sample (Fig. 4c), contained 20% FH, kaolinite plates in Areas 1 and 4 contain no visible evidence of FH. Ferrihydrite occurs in small amounts in Area 2 and is more evident in Area 3 and below it and throughout the southeast quadrant of the micrograph. One aggregate of FH occurs at 5 and two laths at 6 and 7 are believed to be natural goethite contaminants based on their shape, size, and high absorbance of the electron beam. Natural goethite occurs in similarly shaped laths (Dixon, 1997). Areas 1, 8, and 9 contain kaolinite plates (Fig. 4d) that are free of FH in spite of the presence of 30% of the added oxide. The granularity and density of FH is evident in Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, near the left edge of the micrograph. Although some of the FH is on the kaolinite, much of it extends well beyond the layer silicate particularly in Areas 2, 5, 6, and 7. Thus in spite of the large amount of FH added, some kaolinite surfaces appear to be free of the oxide and much of the FH extends beyond the layer silicate particles.

Halloysite–Ferrihydrite Association
Halloysite particles are smooth and free of granular attachments (Fig. 5a). The inset at 1 is a segment of the particle below it that demonstrates how smooth the particles are even when enlarged. One notable exception is the tube with notches below and to the right of the inset. It appears to have formed adjacent to other tubes that prevented its full growth and left the semicircular notches. The hole in the carbon support membrane enhances the view of interior layer separations parallel to the tube axis and shows the smoothness of the exterior of the two particles that overlay the hole. Adjacent to Particle 2 is a wide assortment of tube lengths illustrating the diversity in aspect ratio in this halloysite sample. Unfortunately this holey carbon grid support membrane is not as clean as the silicon monoxide membranes used for the other micrographs and two small dark contaminant spots are evident adjacent to the Particle 2 and a few other lighter ones are visible near the bottom of the micrograph.

An overview of the halloysite micrographs (Fig. 5b–d) shows that very little FH is independently resting on the support membrane suggesting that the oxide was associated with the layer silicate tubes before the suspension was dried on the support membrane. The inter-particle space is clean indicating complete particle association between FH and halloysite.

The presence of 10% FH added to the halloysite is evident as irregular aggregates in the micrograph at 1, 2, 3, and 4 (Fig. 5b). Also, FH is present as many small particles attached to the halloysite tubes that are most evident in the enlarged inset at 5 from the adjacent particle to its left. Numerous particles of FH are evident in this micrograph of the sample containing 20% FH (Fig. 5c). The inset particle segment at 3 shows the granular particles of FH throughout neglecting the small plate, presumably kaolinite, near the top of the inset cut from the tube to its left. This sample (Fig. 5d) contains 30% FH and the halloysite particles consistently have associated small or large particles of FH that give the tubes an overall appearance of rough surfaces. The FH particles are profuse from small to large on the halloysite tube segment in enlarged Inset 1. Ferrihydrite is porous and highly hydrated when formed, thus it does not absorb the electron beam as completely as solid Fe oxides like goethite.

The distribution of FH at the three treatment levels in halloysite contrasts with the kaolinite treatment results discussed above. As the amount of FH was increased the numerous small particles that adhere to the tubes became more prominent. The frequency of FH particles on the halloysite tubes is much greater than on the kaolinite plates and the size range of the FH particles is smaller on the halloysite.

Bulk Density versus Centrifugal Force
Increasing centrifugation speed in steps to obtain the calculated force from 11 to 5519 x g increased sample bulk density of both sets of formulated soils as expected (Fig. 6). The addition of FH decreased the Db of both clays yet the amount of FH added appeared unimportant for kaolinite (Fig. 6). In contrast, halloysite bulk densities were progressively decreased by each additional amount of FH including the 30% level. The smaller stepwise additions of FH illustrated in Fig. 7 indicate that for kaolinite 10% FH leveled off and Db was uniform to 30%. Halloysite minimum Db apparently was reached at about 20% FH, which is consistent with the higher surface area of halloysite than kaolinite.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Bulk density versus gravitational forces for (a) kaolinite and (b) halloysite with 10 and 30% ferrihydryite additions to the clay.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Bulk density versus ferrihydrite content of kaolinite and halloysite mixed with various amounts of Fe oxide and centrifuged at 5519 x g.

 
Hydraulic Conductivity
The hydraulic conductivity range of kaolinite clay was less for compacted kaolinite than for halloysite throughout the bulk density range (Fig. 8). This seems to be explained by the uniform platy particle shape of kaolinite versus the greater diversity in particle shape of halloysite with no dominant plane of particle orientation. The 10% FH increased the hydraulic conductivity for both clays and increased the hydraulic conductivity range for the three compaction levels. The 30% FH treatment was sufficient to block most of the conducting pores in both clays. Changes in FH morphology with compaction will be discussed later.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Hydraulic conductivity vs. bulk density for (a) kaolinite and (b) halloysite with various amounts of ferrihydrite additions to the clay.

 
Bulk Density after Polymer Treatments
Kaolinite Db values were variable following treatments by three PAM polymers and a definite trend is not evident for the cationic or neutral polymers (Fig. 9). The lack of definite trend for the polymer loading may be the result of low adsorption of the polymers on the 1:1 minerals. The maximum adsorptions of the three polymers on kaolinite were around 10 mg g–1 and the three polymers had very close adsorption isotherms on kaolinite (Deng, 2001). Cationic and neutral polymers slightly reduced Db of halloysite. The greater responsiveness of halloysite than kaolinite again points out the more chemical reactivity of halloysite that may be caused by a combination of particle size and cation exchange differences. Higher rates of polymer application may be more beneficial. The anionic polymer had no visible effect on the Db of either mineral except for the highest treatment where the Db increased as would be expected for a dispersing ion. The 0.4 Db difference between kaolinite and halloysite is large and only slightly larger than for these minerals without FH addition (Fig. 7).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Bulk density vs. polyacrylamide added to kaolinite and halloysite as (a) nonionic polymer, (b) anionic polymer, and (c) cationic polymer.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The experimental results obtained with simple laboratory methods support the hypothesis given earlier that tubular morphology of halloysite reduces the bulk density of the soil at various levels of compaction compared with platy kaolinite clay. The presence of the Fe oxide FH also reduces the Db as suggested by the naturally hydrated state of FH discussed earlier (Wells and Childs, 1988). The Db for 20 and 30% FH additions was the same for kaolinite indicating complete filling of the interstitial space accessible at the forces applied. Halloysite gave progressively lower Db under compaction for 10 and 25% FH additions (Fig. 7). These differences are attributed to the smaller halloysite particles and their curved surfaces that cannot be packed as completely as kaolinite plates. Also, the frequent association of FH with halloysite surely reduced the tendency for more compaction observed for kaolinite.

Halloysite–Ferrihydrite Association
There is growing evidence that halloysite has isomorphous substitution creating limited negative charge sites on the particles (Bailey, 1989; Tari et al., 1999). The presence of limited substitution favors sorption of FH that is assumed to have many positive sites since it has a zero point of charge between pH 7 and 9 (Bartoli et al., 1992; Bigham et al., 2002). The pH range of our samples is below neutrality. Also, a special affinity of goethite for halloysite was reported for a New Zealand halloysite (Golden and Dixon, 1985). The halloysite was mostly removed with the goethite by magnetic fractionation, indicating a strong Fe oxide–halloysite association.

Kaolinite and Ferrihydrite Relationships
Kaolinite and FH mixtures compacted by centrifugation formed porous tabular masses of FH only loosely associated with the kaolinite plates in contrast to the frequent association of irregular particles of FH that adhered to similarly compacted mixtures of halloysite and FH. The kaolinite plates apparently pressed the FH into sheet-like masses and the absence of charge on the kaolinite plates did not produce compound particles as for halloysite and FH. This tendency for FH to be shaped by pressure as a colloid may contribute to its occurrence in Fe concentrations in soils and sediments, for example, placic soil horizons and bog Fe ores (Schwertmann and Taylor, 1989).

Ferrihydrite Colloids
Ferrihydrite is one of the few soil minerals that is gelatinous and has been observed to form and dissolve seasonally (Wang et al., 1993). It occurs only as small disorderly crystals well within the colloidal range when fully dispersed. Also, it has spheroidal particles approximately 5 nm in diameter (Schwertmann and Taylor, 1989). Recent investigations have shown that the number of colloidal spheres (10–7–10–9 m) in each packing polyhedron and density range is the same (Manoharan et al., 2003). Considering FH as an assembly of (hollow) colloidal spheres offers a new avenue for investigating this poorly crystalline soil mineral.

Applications
A thorough evaluation of the range of adsorptive versus structural properties of kaolinites and halloysites is needed to better define the characteristics of these two minerals. Abnormally high cation-exchange capacities for kaolinite in geologic specimens was attributed to smectite based on lattice fringes intimately associated with the kaolinite. Yet the smectite was not detected by XRD (Ma and Eggleton, 1999). Our observations in this paper indicate the need for investigations of the composition of halloysite and kaolinite in soils at the nanometer scale. The breadth of the definition of halloysite is called into question by the results of this study and related references on its charge properties.

Halloysite frequently forms under wet conditions as indicated by the locations where it occurs and the presence of interlayer water in the 1-nm phase. It forms in the rock–soil interface zone (Calvert et al., 1980), in hydrothermal springs and subtropical weathering of rhyolite volcanics (Harvey and Murray, 1993), in cracks in tonstein (Senkayi et al., 1984) and around weathering of granite boulders (observed in Alabama by J.B. Dixon). These observations suggest that the presence of halloysite in soils and saprolite (our sample) is associated with movement of surface water to ground water. Thus, understanding the hydraulic behavior of halloysite is useful for predicting movement and properties of ground water. A better understanding of the sorption properties of halloysite for FH and surfactants should help in understanding the chemistry of ground water.

Soils containing halloysite appear to have more potential for structural improvement by FH aggregation than soils containing the same amount of kaolinite. Halloysite has been reported in soils at 45 locations throughout the world (Allen and Hajek, 1989). It is most often reported in volcanic soils that abound in Central America, Japan, New Zealand, and in the USA in Oregon and Hawaii. Halloysite also has been reported in soils of Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, and Alabama. In view of the weak XRD curve of halloysite probably it is sometimes overlooked or confused with kaolinite, which is ubiquitous in soil clays.

Partial success of PAM organic polymers as a surrogate for soil organic matter in fabricated soils clays deserves further evaluation. This paper is a small step toward forming a synthetic soil. It is worthy of note that the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) in California established the first synthetic biology department in 2003 (Ferber, 2004). The LBNL example provides a challenge to soil scientists to fabricate synthetic soils for research and instruction to sharpen concepts and quantify biological, chemical, mineralogical, and physical reactions in soils.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We express our gratitude to B.F. Hajek, Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn, University, Auburn, AL for his assistance in obtaining the halloysite used in these investigations. Thanks to Catherine Grant for graphical assistance.

Received for publication August 11, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
W. Markgraf and R. Horn
Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive Scan Analyses and Rheological Investigations of South-Brazilian Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 851 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
E. JOUSSEIN, S. PETIT, J. CHURCHMAN, B. THENG, D. RIGHI, and B. DELVAUX
Halloysite clay minerals -- a review
Clay Minerals, December 1, 2005; 40(4): 383 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by West, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, J. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by West, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Soil Mineralogy


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality