SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hubbell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hubbell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hubbell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:709-710 (2004).
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

COMMENTS & LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Comments on "Tensiometer modification for diminishing errors due to the fluctuating inner water column"

Joel M. Hubbell* and J. Buck Sisson{dagger}

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 MS 2107 Idaho Falls, ID 83415

In the recent paper by Thalheimer (2003), the changing level of water in a tensiometer is identified as a significant source of error in tensiometer measurements, and a design change is proposed that reduces such error. This design change involves monitoring pressure at a point below the water level in the tensiometer, thereby removing the height of water in the tensiometer from the measurement. This results in considerable ease in analyzing the data since the drift in measurements is essentially eliminated. This self-compensating feature works until the water level in the tensiometer falls beneath the point of pressure measurement.

We propose simplifying the tensiometer design further and at the same time reducing the error resulting from temperature changes at land surface. Starting with Eq. [1] of Thalheimer (2003),

[1]
where h is the measured pressure at the pressure sensor, he is the soil water matric potential, zT is the height of water above the point of measurement, and zB is the height of water on the capillary tube in Thalheimer's design (see Fig. 1a) . Equation [1] simplifies to

[2]



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Modified tensiometer design by Thalheimer (2003) and (b) proposed design with pressure sensor at measurement point for matric potential.

 
Thalheimer's design can be further simplified by placing the pressure sensor at the same depth as the point of measurement as shown in Fig. 1b (typically the centerline of the porous cup), resulting in zB = 0 or

[3]
The tensiometer now provides estimates of matric potential.

The advent of small waterproof pressure sensors (e.g., Motorola, Phoenix, AZ, model MPX4250A; Electronic Engineering Innovations, Las Cruces, NM, model 15) allows sensors to be placed within the water column at the point of measurement (Fig. 1b, 2) while using the technique presented by Thalheimer (2003) to remove the effects of changing water levels.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Advanced tensiometer design with pressure sensor located at matric potential measurement point (typically centerline of porous cup–modified after Sisson et al. [2002]).

 
While the capillary tube and air expansion bulb diminish the effect of changing water level in the tensiometer from the pressure measurement, the upper section of the tensiometer remains full of air and exposed to temperature fluctuations that cause large unwanted variations in the data. Placing the entire water column connecting the pressure sensor to the tensiometer cup below the soil surface has been shown to reduce the effect of temperature fluctuations on measurements (Hubbell and Sisson, 1996, 1998, 2003). These temperature fluctuations tend to drive water into and out of the tensiometer, such that refilling is typically required once or twice a week. Reducing these temperature changes can increase the operational interval to months or years (Sisson et al., 2002).

The proposed system, when combined with the advanced (or portable) tensiometer design, self-compensates for changes in the hanging water column, becomes a matric potential sensor, can be installed at depths >10 m, isolates the sensor from temperature fluctuations, and increases the time interval between maintenance events.

NOTES

* jmh{at}inel.gov Back

{dagger} buck{at}reallife.mgrf.net Back

REFERENCES





This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hubbell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hubbell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hubbell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sisson, J. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome