SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies
Right arrow Soil Chemistry
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Soil Science Society of America Journal 67:795-797 (2003)
© 2003 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-2—NOTES

Dissolved organic carbon is released from sealings and glues of pore-water samplers

Jan Siemens* and Martin Kaupenjohann

Institute of Soil Science, University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart

* Corresponding author (jan.siemens{at}tu-berlin.de)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
To quantify solute concentrations in soil pore waters, their alteration on contact with sampler components should be negligible compared with naturally occurring concentrations. We hypothezise that elastomer sealings and glues are potential sources of dissolved organic C (DOC) in pore water samples. We immersed different sealing materials and filled assembled samplers with water and determined the release of DOC from glues, elastomers, and other components of suction cups and plates into water samples. Between 0.8 and 63 mg DOC L-1 were released on contact with sampler parts. We conclude that soil solution samplers should be designed without glues or elastomers, if DOC concentrations <10 mg L-1 are the targets of investigations and expected flux rates are low. Glass suction plates entirely made from borosilicate glass avoided the contamination of samples with sealing derived DOC.

Abbreviations: DOC, dissolved organic C • PMMA, polymethylmetacrylate • POM, polyoxymethylene • PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
POROUS CUPS AND PLATES that are used to sample pore waters of soils and sediments may alter the sample composition by filtration effects, precipitation of solid phases, gas exchange between sample and atmosphere, and sorption or release of chemical species (Grossmann and Udluft, 1991; Krejsl et al., 1994; Wessel-Bothe et al., 2000). The alteration of sample composition should be negligible compared with naturally occurring concentrations of the target solute. Porous cups and plates are commonly sealed with elastomers or glues. Although glues and elastomers contain organic C in the form of polymers, organic solvents and plasticizers, the possible release of such sealing-derived organic C into pore water samples has received only limited attention. We tested whether the release of organic solutes from sealings affects the quantification of DOC concentrations in pore water samples. Furthermore we present a suction plate entirely made from borosilicate glass that did not release organic C.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
In a first experiment, samples of 3 cm2 of neoprene (polychloroprene) and buna-N (nitrile) were immersed in 10 mL of tap water containing 4 mg DOC L-1 in glass beakers for 5 d to compare DOC release. It was tested whether DOC release could be reduced by placing the sealings in 250 mL of tap water for 14 d before the DOC release experiment (Table 1, Test A). In a second step, the alternative sealing materials silicone rubber and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) were compared with neoprene and buna-N. The silicone sealings were cut from 1-mm thick transparent sheets of silicone rubber of different hardness (shore 40 and shore 60) provided by two distributors (Fähnletechnic, Göppingen and Renner, Stuttgart, both Germany). After comparing DOC release of different materials, suction plates of 90-mm diam. were assembled and sealed using silicone O-rings (Table 1, Test B). The void volume of the suction plates was filled with tap water (10 mL, containing 4 mg DOC L-1) for 2 d to get an estimate of the magnitude of DOC release into pore water samples. The contact time of 2 d is equivalent to a flux rate of 0.8 L m-2 d-1. Five silicone O-rings were retrieved from suction plates that were installed into soil from Nov. 1998 till Sept. 1999. Dissolved organic C release from these aged O-rings into tap water was compared with DOC release from new O-rings (Table 1, Test C). In a further set of experiments, we examined the release of DOC from glues (Table 1, Test D) and assembled suction cups and plates that were sealed with glues (Table 1, Test E). Finally, suction plates entirely made from borosilicate glass were checked for DOC release into deionized water (Table 1, Test F). Deionized water was chosen instead of tap water, because the tests were run parallel to the cleaning of suction plates by rinsing them with deionized water.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Change of dissolved organic C (DOC) concentration in water on contact with sealings and components of suction plates and suction cups.

 
The change in DOC concentrations on contact with sampler parts was compared with the concentration change in controls. Dissolved organic C concentrations were determined on a DIMATOC 100 TOC analyzer (Dimatec, Essen, Germany). Given the low number of replicates it was not feasible to test the data for normal distribution. Therefore, we tested the significance of differences of DOC concentrations relative to pure water controls by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test that does not rely on a normal distribution of data (SPSS 9.0.1, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Buna-N and neoprene induced a large increase in DOC concentrations in 5 d, which reduced after aging these materials in water for 14 d (Table 1, Test A). However there was still a significant increase in DOC concentrations on contact with these materials compared with the control. Release of DOC from silicone was much lower than release from buna-N and neoprene. Yet also silicone increased DOC concentrations significantly. Only PTFE did not change the DOC concentration of tap water significantly. However, attempts to seal suction plates with PTFE sealings were not successful. Because of the hydrophobic surface of PTFE, we were not able to realize bubbling pressures higher than approximately 60 hPa. Therefore, suction plates were assembled and sealed using the Fähnletechnic silicone O-rings. While polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) and polyoxymethylene (POM) components did not induce a significant change in DOC concentrations (Test B, Table 1), the silicone O-rings increased the DOC concentration by 9.4 mg L-1. Hence, the specific DOC release rate (mg DOC L-1 cm-2 d-1) of O-rings in assembled suction plates was as high as the specific DOC release rate from sole O-rings.

Aging of buna-N and neoprene showed that DOC release from elastomers decreases with time because of the leaching of mobile organic components, indicating that the release of DOC might be reduced to an acceptable magnitude by equilibration in the field. Similarly, Guggenberger and Zech (1992) showed that equilibration of ceramic suction cups mitigated sorption of DOC by ceramic cups. We retrieved silicone O-rings that were installed in the soil for 1 yr and determined their release of organic C. The increase in DOC concentrations was less than half of the increase that was induced by new O-rings (Test C). Nevertheless, the increase in DOC concentrations was still significant.

Dissolved organic C was not only released by elastomers, but also by different glues that are used to assemble samplers (Tests D and E).

To relate the increase in DOC concentrations in the batch experiments to the field situation we have to compare both the residence time of pore water in the sampler, and the magnitude of the increase in DOC concentrations. The residence time of 2 d would be exceeded at a flux rate <0.8 L m-2 d-1, which is frequently observed in the field especially in summer (J. Siemens and Kaupenjohann unpublished data, 1999). The absolute increase in DOC concentrations of 4.7 to 14.5 mg L-1 in assembled samplers because of release of organic C from sealings and glues is of similar magnitude as DOC concentrations in pore waters of subsoils and sediments (Moore, 1998; Michalzik et al., 2001). Hence, the release of organic C from sealings may significantly affect the monitoring of naturally occurring DOC concentrations, and possibly the speciation of other solutes.

To avoid a contamination of pore water samples with organics, we designed a sampler entirely made of borosilicate glass (Fig. 1) . By fusing the glass parts at high temperature the use of sealings could be avoided. After rinsing these samplers with water, no release of organic C was detected (Test E).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Section of glass suction plate (hydraulic conductivity: 6 x 10-7 ± 4 x 10-7 m s-1, n = 14; bubbling pressure: >400 hPa).

 
We conclude that pore water samplers should be designed without elastomers and glues if expected DOC concentrations are <10 mg L-1 and additionally the contact time of solution samples and samplers is in the range of days because of low flux rates.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the water works/agriculture cooperation programs of the City of Münster and the City of Warendorf, the Stadtwerke Münster GmbH, the Wasserversorgung Beckum GmbH, the Westfälisch-Lippischer Landwirtschaftsverband, and the Environmental Department of the City of Münster for financial support. We also thank Alfons Peine for coordinating the financial aspects. Martti Haas determined the release of DOC from suction cups.


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Currently at: Institute of Ecology, Department of Soil Science, Technical University of Berlin, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany.

Received for publication July 10, 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. Weihermuller, J. Siemens, M. Deurer, S. Knoblauch, H. Rupp, A. Gottlein, and T. Putz
In Situ Soil Water Extraction: A Review
J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1735 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Siemens and M. Kaupenjohann
Comparison of Three Methods for Field Measurement of Solute Leaching in a Sandy Soil
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1191 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies
Right arrow Soil Chemistry
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome