|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Natural Resource Sciences, Macdonald Campus of McGill Univ., Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9
b Dep. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Macdonald Campus of McGill Univ., Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9
* Corresponding author (magdalena.burgess{at}mail.mcgill.ca)
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: CDD, cumulative degree-days above 0°C CT, conventional tillage grain corn DD, degree-days above 0°C NT, no-till grain corn RT, reduced tillage grain corn
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Grain-corn residues contain large amounts of N (e.g., 4080 kg N ha-1, depending on yield and N concentrations), thus contributing to soil N pools as well as to soil humus formation. However, their C/N ratio is rather high (67 in the current study), and would therefore be expected to result in N immobilization by decomposer organisms at some point in the decomposition process. It is often stated that net N immobilization is likely to occur following addition of plant material with a C/N ratio above
25 (Paul and Clark, 1989; Brady and Weil, 1996; Myrold, 1998), and some references have recommended supplemental N fertilizer additions for crops following grain corn (Aldrich et al., 1975; Association des Fabricants d'Engrais du Québec, 1994).
Residue N dynamics are influenced both by residue quality and by residue placement depth (e.g., surface vs. buried) and other environmental factors. Some studies report greater or more prolonged N immobilization in no-till soil (Rice and Smith, 1984) or surface residues (Cochran, 1991). Considerable N immobilization by corn residues has been reported from laboratory studies (Green and Blackmer, 1995; Recous et al., 1995). Reports of immobilization under field conditions have been variable, but generally involve smaller N amounts than those in laboratory studies (Parker, 1962; Zaborski, 1995).
The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) overall N immobilization and release patterns for crop residues applied to land under grain-corn production under three tillage systems in eastern Canadian conditions; (ii) whether different corn residue types (leaf, stem, husk, cob) differ in their response to placement depth, relating N dynamics to initial residue characteristics and subsequent mass loss patterns; and (iii) how each residue type contributes to overall patterns of net N immobilization and release by pooled residues.
Mesh bags (litterbags) containing corn leaves, stems, husks, or cobs were left to decompose under field conditions for up to 2 yr, and retrieved for determination of residue mass and N content. It was expected that separate consideration of the different residue types would provide insights into overall residue N dynamics for pooled or mixed corn residues, facilitate comparison with studies that have involved different mixes (e.g., stems only, leaves + stems, leaves + stems + husks), and show how including or excluding particular plant parts might affect overall conclusions regarding residue N dynamics. To our knowledge, this is the first field study to consider the respective roles of constituent plant parts in determining overall N dynamics of grain-corn residues, and the first litterbag study of corn residue N dynamics to have been done under Canadian conditions.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Corn (Funk 4120 hybrid) was planted in rows spaced 76 cm apart on 26 May 1997, 11 May 1998, and 6 May 1999. Each corn row had a wheel-tracked interrow on one side and an untracked interrow on the other. At seeding, (NH4)2HPO4 was banded 5 cm below and 5 cm beside the seeds in the untracked interrows to provide 40 kg N ha-1 and 43 kg P (102 kg P2O5) ha-1. Two to 4 wk later (912 June 1997, 5 June 1998, 4 June 1999), NH4NO3 and KCl were applied (top-dressed) to the central portion of each wheel-tracked interrow to provide an additional 140 kg N ha-1 and 123 kg K (148 kg K2O) ha-1.
Litterbag Preparation and Processing
Crop residues, defined here as aboveground plant parts excluding grain, were collected just before the 1995 harvest for use in the litterbag study. They were separated into four residue types: leaves; stems, cut into 10- to 15-cm lengths; husks; and cobs after grain removal, cut into pieces weighing
5 g each. Leaves included approximately equal parts of leaf sheaths and leaf blades, and husks included a 3.25 to 1 ratio of husk leaves (the husk proper) to husk stems (stem attaching cob and husk to main stem). Residues were oven-dried at 60°C for up to 48 h in a forced-draft oven. They were then placed in mesh bags (litterbags) made from fiberglass screen (
1.0 by 1.3-mm openings). Sets were assembled joining together one bag of each of the four residue types, which were then placed and retrieved as a unit.
Litterbags for the main study were placed in early November 1996, at or just after time of tillage. Within each plot, sets were placed in two lines 76 cm apart. In spring, seed-rows were then positioned so that one line of bags would be located in a high-N wheel-tracked interrow, and the other in a low-N untracked interrow. Within each line, sets of bags were positioned at 1-m intervals. Placement depths were 0 cm (surface) and 5 cm in all plots, with an additional placement at 20 cm (plow-sole depth) in CT plots only. Buried sets were centered directly below surface sets at each location. For instance, in CT plots, the 20-cm sets were placed in the furrow at time of plowing (locations were recorded relative to fixed reference points), and 5- and 0-cm sets were then positioned directly above them. On each sampling date, a surface bag and underlying buried bags were retrieved from one location per line in each plot. Samples from both lines in each plot were processed and analyzed separately but results pooled prior to statistical analyses.
There were six sampling dates in 1997 (13 May, 26 June, 29 July, 26 August, 22 September, 15 October) and three dates in 1998 (stems and cobs only, 22 April and 20 July; all types, 2 October). The longer-term litterbags were briefly removed as necessary during intervening tillage operations and immediately replaced. Statistical analyses used the model Y equal to block depth-till, with three blocks and seven levels for the depth-till factor (0- and 5-cm placements in each of NT, RT and CT, and 20 cm in CT only). Analyses of variance were performed separately for each residue type and date, using the general linear models procedure (SAS Institute, 1987), and differences evaluated by preplanned contrasts. In a short-term study conducted in spring 1999, litterbags were placed on 2 May 1999 in NT plots only (single line per plot, 0- and 5-cm depths), and retrieved after 1, 2, 4, or 6 wk. The short-term study provided for separate data collection for leaf blades, leaf sheaths, husk leaves, and husk stems, as well as cobs and stems.
Upon retrieval, mesh bags were placed in coolers or cold storage (<4°C) and processed within 6 to 24 h. The residues were spray-rinsed to remove adhering soil, removed from the mesh bags, oven-dried in paper bags (48 h at 60°C), and weighed. Samples were ground (<1 mm) in a Cyclone sample mill (Udy Corp., Fort Collins, CO), placed in airtight specimen bottles, redried overnight, and kept capped until further processing. Total N was determined using an H2SO4-H2O2 digestion procedure (Allen, 1989). Ash content was determined for each sample (muffle furnace, 550°C overnight in Pyrex tubes (Corning Glassware, Science Products, Corning, NJ). This was used (together with ash content of initial residue and of soil) to correct for adhering soil, after Schuman and Belden (1991).
Initial Residue Quality
Initial chemical composition for each residue type was determined using the same material as was used in preparing the litterbags, oven-dried and ground as previously described. Organic C was determined by wet oxidation-redox titration (Tiessen and Moir, 1993). Analysis for lignin content and materials soluble in neutral detergent used the methods of Goering and van Soest (1970). For N, C, and ash, 12 to 15 samples of each initial residue were analyzed individually; for lignin, solubles, etc., these were composited into three mixed samples of each type. Separate analyses were done for leaf blades, leaf sheaths, husk leaves, and husk stems. These data were then combined using the appropriate ratios to obtain overall leaf and husk values. Values for totals including all or some of the component plant parts were calculated taking into account initial quantity and N content of each plant part in the field at harvest (Table 1).
|
![]() |
Daily DD were summed to give cumulative DD above 0°C (CDD) since time of residue placement.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1 g N kg-1 initial residue, whereas in the low-N interrows, there was little or no increase in N content.) Pooling of data from all residues combined indicated that overall N release was slower from surface residues than from buried residues from the second sampling date onward (Fig. 3 top). By the end of the 2-yr study, all surface residues together had released 53% of their initial N (3.5 g N released kg-1 initial residue), while buried residues released between 70 and 80% of initial N. Similar trends were found if pooled totals were calculated including stems and leaves only (Fig. 3 bottom), or including stems, leaves and husks but not cobs (not shown).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The short-term study confirmed that rapid early N immobilization (preceded by initial N loss) was indeed possible for stem, cob, and husk residues. However it is not known to what extent results from spring-placed residues are applicable to fall-placed residue conditions.
Many studies have reported greater or delayed N immobilization, or slower N release, by surface residues as compared with buried residues (Christensen, 1986; Cochran, 1991; Schomberg et al., 1994). Earlier N release by buried residues was indeed evident for our faster-decomposing residues, i.e., leaves and husks. With stems and cobs, buried residues held more N than surface residues on at least some of the sampling dates. With cobs, depth differences during most of the study were <1 g N kg-1 of added residue, and seemed related to the larger increase in buried-cob N in high-N interrows after the June 1997 fertilizer application.
Residue Nitrogen Content and Mass-Loss Phase
Residues appeared to go through several phases in their decomposition, with N dynamics related to stage or extent of mass loss. Even low-N residues appeared to have at least a brief initial period of N loss after placement, in common with data presented in other studies (Staaf and Berg, 1982; Christensen, 1986; Schomberg et al., 1994). Since a certain fraction of initial residue components is water-soluble, some initial N (and C) losses can occur because of leaching (Christensen, 1986; Parsons et al., 1990), if the water-soluble portion is exposed to sufficient precipitation or soil water movement. Tenney and Waksman (1929) reported that for corn leaves and stems near maturity, 38% of total N was soluble in cold water; Parker et al. (1957) reported a similar figure for N in mature cornstalks. However, under field conditions with intact rather than ground residue, not all such material is necessarily available for leaching (e.g., Havis and Alberts, 1993).
The initial period of N loss was followed in many cases by a period of increasing or relatively unchanging (albeit variable) residue N content. Fluctuating N levels, including several peaks and dips in residue N content over time, have been observed in studies with forest leaf litter (Blair and Crossley, 1988). A more sustained period of N loss eventually followed. This seemed to generally begin only after at least 50 to 60% of initial residue mass had been lost (Fig. 5) , which occurred later for surface-placed than for buried residue, and later for the residues with more recalcitrant and less accessible components, i.e., cobs and stems.
|
Nitrogen Concentrations versus Mass Loss
The relationship between N concentration and mass loss (or mass) appeared to be slightly curvilinear, especially if data from all depths were included (Fig. 6)
. Some authors (Aber and Melillo, 1982; Schomberg et al., 1994) have used relationships between mass and N concentration (calculated separately for each depth, and assumed to be linear) to predict maximum N immobilization (timing and quantity) from mass and concentration data. However, such calculations may be of limited predictive applicability if maximum N immobilization occurs before or after (or between) sampling dates and is not indicated by the data collected.
|
Calculated totals that excluded either cobs alone or both cobs and husks had higher initial N concentrations, but lower initial residue-N amounts on a per-hectare basis, assuming leaf and stem applications were unchanged. Overall N-loss patterns were essentially the same with and without the cob and husk data, but with slightly faster N loss on a percentage basis when cobs and husks were excluded (Fig. 3). Returning cobs (and husks) to the field rather than removing them thus seems to have a minimal impact on overall residue N content, partly because of the small quantities of such residues as a percentage of the total residue returned.
Comparison with Other Field Studies with Corn
In general, overwinter N losses (pooled residues) were similar to those reported for corn stalks and leaves on a tilled-planted site in Iowa (Alberts and Shrader, 1980). Alberts and Shrader (1980) supposed that most of this was probably because of leaf decomposition. Our data indicate that about half of our overwinter decrease (1012 kg N ha-1) was because of N loss from leaves, with stems accounting for another 40% of the total decrease (710 kg N ha-1), and cobs and husks the remainder.
Our N-content values were lower than those reported by Parker (1962) for corn residue in Iowa, perhaps because the latter placed the residue in spring rather than fall, exposing them to different soil N and moisture conditions. Also, Parker's maximum N values (120% of initial N, or 2 g N immobilized per kilogram initial residue) occurred for buried residue at the 20% mass-loss stage, earlier than our first sampling date. Fall-placed surface corn residues in Ohio (Zaborski, 1995) also increased in N content at this mass-loss stage (preceded by a period of N loss), as did surface residues in our short-term study. However, the 20% figure does not necessarily hold for all conditions: there was no corresponding peak for buried residues in our short-term study, nor for surface residues in our main study (although net N release did stop).
Unlike results from studies by Parker (1962) and Zaborski (1995), our main-study litterbag data (pooled residues) showed no net increase in total residue N content between sampling dates, other than the very slight increase in June 1997 for buried residues. Earlier monitoring (e.g., fall, spring), and use of alternative techniques to determine fate of N and C lost from the residue, would be useful given the substantial mass losses observed between November and May. It is not known, for instance, whether residue-N released in this period would contribute to overwinter NO-3 leaching losses or be retained in the soil profile, or both. It is also not known whether N immobilization by low-N residue components occurred at some point between fall placement and spring sampling, which could help reduce overwinter N losses from the soil system as suggested by Powlson et al. (1985) in a UK study with wheat straw (C/N ratio of 73).
Differences Between Tillage Systems at Field Scale
Residue N dynamics at field scale under different tillage systems would reflect the residue depth distribution characteristic of each tillage system. Using litterbag N data from the appropriate depth(s) and tillage plots, residue N content in kilograms of N per hectare was calculated assuming that all residues remained on the surface in NT plots, two-thirds were buried in RT plots, and 95% were buried in CT plots. These calculations estimated that the amount of N held by the residues placed in fall 1996 was similar in all three tillage systems on the first three sampling dates (13 May30 July 1997), and amounts held by RT and CT were nearly identical throughout the study. From August 1997 onward, RT and CT residues held somewhat less N than NT residues, which lost both N and mass more slowly. The maximum calculated difference between NT and CT was 10 kg N ha-1 (September 1997). Possible effects of such differences on soil N availability (e.g., levels of soil NO-3 or NH+4) would probably not be detectable against the high background variability in inorganic soil N levels. In addition, soil N availability would be influenced by residue additions from previous years, as well as possible effects of tillage or long-term residue additions on soil organic matter, N mineralization, nitrification, etc.
Decomposition of surface leaves and husks, and perhaps stems and cobs, probably proceeds faster than was indicated by litterbag data, at least in the first year, because of greater exposure to physical forces of fragmentation (e.g., raindrop impact, tractor traffic). Also, some NT residue is in fact buried each year through seeding operations, earthworm (e.g., Lumbricus terrestris) activity, etc., further accelerating its breakdown. It is therefore possible than N immobilization by surface-placed husks and stems, and perhaps N release by surface-placed leaves, would occur sooner under nonlitterbag conditions. These effects might cancel each other out, or could result in an earlier release of residue N in NT than indicated above. This could lead to even smaller differences between NT and RT or CT systems overall, at least where these systems have been in place for several years.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitrogen dynamics were related to ease of residue decomposition as well as initial N content, and were thus influenced by residue physical and chemical characteristics as well as by environmental conditions. For instance while cobs had very low initial N content (C/N ratio of 149), their slow decomposition appeared to limit microbial N needs at any given time, so that net amounts of N immobilized during the study were small. Physical as well as chemical characteristics may also have influenced residue N response to placement depth.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication July 24, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, J. K. Ladha, C. S. Khind, T. S. Khera, and C. S. Bueno Effects of Residue Decomposition on Productivity and Soil Fertility in Rice-Wheat Rotation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2004; 68(3): 854 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||