SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCracken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCracken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. V.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCracken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Humic Substances
Right arrow Pedology
Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:563-568 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-5—PEDOLOGY

Dissolved Organic Carbon Retention in Soils

Comparison of Solution and Soil Measurements

Kimberly L. McCracken*,a, William H. McDowellb, Robert D. Harterb and Christine V. Evansc

a USDA-NRCS, 11 Industrial Park Drive, Walpole, NH 03608
b Dep. of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, James Hall, Durham, NH 03824
c Geology Department, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, WI 53141-2000

* Corresponding author (kmccracken{at}nh.usda.gov)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Interactions between dissolved organic C (DOC) and mineral soils were examined in a laboratory column study. Specific emphasis was given to comparisons of soil and solution measurements of organic C (OC) retention in four soil parent materials. Soil columns were leached with one of three concentrations of forest floor (FF) leachate or distilled water every third day for 1 yr. The concentration of DOC in solution was analyzed before and after percolation through soil columns to assess net release or retention of DOC. Changes in soil chemical properties (pH, loss-on-ignition [LOI], extractable Al and Fe) following leaching were consistent with podzolization. Micromorphological investigation of the soil materials following leaching showed increased accumulation of organo-metallic coatings in materials treated with high concentrations of DOC relative to distilled water or low concentrations of DOC. The most dramatic changes in soil chemical properties were found in soils leached with high concentrations of DOC. Comparison of solution and soil measures of OC retention indicates that only ~50% of the DOC lost from solution was measured as soil OC at the end of the experiment. This finding suggests that microbial decomposition is a significant factor regulating OC concentrations in soils and that soil solution data alone do not yield a complete picture of soil OC dynamics.

Abbreviations: DOC, dissolved organic C • FF, forest floor • FF-High, full strength • FF-Low, 1:9 forest floor leachate/distilled water • FF-medium, 1:1 forest floor leachate/distilled water • LOI, loss on ignition • OC, organic C • subscript p, sodium pyrophosphate extractable


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
ON GLOBAL AND REGIONAL SCALES, examination of the retention and turnover of DOC is useful in characterizing and quantifying the C storage capacity of forest soils. Dissolved OC in soil solution may be exported to groundwater or surface waters, utilized by microbes, or retained in the soil by abiotic mechanisms. It is generally accepted that DOC concentrations in soil solution decline with depth in mineral soils as a result of DOC retention by soil surfaces (McDowell and Likens, 1988; Moore et al., 1992; Vance and David, 1992). Qualls and Haines (1992) concluded that abiotic retention of DOC via adsorption to soil surfaces was primarily responsible for reduction in DOC concentrations because biological decomposition was too slow to account for the large reduction in DOC concentrations observed in field studies. They noted, however, that decomposers may facilitate adsorption processes by removing organic compounds held on the soil exchange complex, thereby opening more sites for additional adsorption (Qualls and Haines, 1992). Their work corroborated early work by McDowell and Wood (1984), who also concluded that abiotic adsorption was largely responsible for DOC retention. Most studies of DOC retention have focused on changes in the concentration and composition of DOC in soil solution. Examination of the changes in soil chemical properties and accumulation of grain coatings, coupled with solution chemistry would provide additional evidence to determine the relative importance of microbial utilization and abiotic sorption of DOC. Additionally, such research would improve understanding of the mechanisms of DOC retention and C sequestration in forest soils.

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of DOC concentration to retention patterns of DOC in soils as evidenced by solution chemistry, soil chemistry, and micromorphology. Few studies have combined these approaches to examine the dynamics of DOC and its role in C retention and turnover in soils. Additionally, this investigation attempted to minimize the differences between laboratory and field investigations by using natural heterogeneous DOC solutions and by not pretreating the soils with strong acids and bases or grinding the soils. Previous investigators have pointed out the need for closing the gap between laboratory and field approaches to weathering and C retention (Davis, 1982; Sollins et al., 1996). Reducing differences between laboratory and field investigations of DOC retention facilitates application of laboratory results to field settings.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Soil Characteristics
Soil parent materials with different lithologic compositions were collected from four locations in New Hampshire (Table 1). The Hermon (sandy-skeletal, isotic, frigid Typic Haplorthods) parent material was collected from the C horizon of a soil pit. The Marlow (Coarse-loamy, isotic, frigid Oxyaquic Haplorthods) and Success (sandy-skeletal, isotic, frigid, ortstein Typic Haplorthods) parent materials were collected by digging horizontally into C horizons of road cuts. The Lombard (Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Typic Dystrudepts) parent material was collected from the 2Cr of a road cut. The 0.053- to 11.2-mm size fraction of all soils was used in this investigation (Table 2). All soils were nearly 100% minerals with little to no organic content. The term parent material will be used to refer to samples collected from the field, whereas untreated soils will be used to refer to the sieved materials used in the investigation. All four parent materials had a very low percentage of <0.053-mm particles; however, the Lombard parent material is derived from phyllite that ranges from easy to moderately difficult to crush by hand. The fragile nature of this material makes measurements of particle-size distribution and surface area of the Lombard samples only approximate measurements. The chemical composition of each untreated soil was determined using x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRAL Activation Services Inc., Ann Arbor, MI). BET soil surface area was measured using a krypton adsorbate (Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected characteristics of the four parent materials collected in New Hampshire.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Particle-size distribution, surface area, and chemical composition of the soil materials used in the investigation. The material <0.053 mm was removed to prevent clogging of the filters. Size fractions were separated by dry sieving.

 
Dissolved Organic Carbon Solution
Forest floor (Oi, Oe, and Oa) material was collected in Durham, NH. The site was dominated by white pine (Pinus strobus) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), with small amounts of white ash (Fraxinus americana) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum). The FF material was refrigerated until used to make leachate solution. For each leaching event, FF leachate was made by combining a 1:5 mass ratio of FF material/distilled water for 6 d. Prior to use, the solution was filtered (38-mm nylon filter, 0.45-mm cellulose nitrate filter). The full-strength solution (FF-high) was diluted to make FF-medium (1:1 FF leachate/distilled water) and FF-low (1:9 FF leachate/distilled water). A sample of each input solution was saved to determine the concentration of DOC. The mean concentrations of DOC in the FF-high, FF-medium, and FF-low input solutions were 26.5, 13.3, and 2.7 mmol C L-1, respectively. The average pH values of the input solutions were: FF-high = 4.1; FF-medium = 4.2; and FF-low = 4.6. Mean concentrations (mmol L-1) of cations in the FF-high solution were: Al, 103; Ca, 236; Fe, 50.5; Mg, 74.7; and Si, 151.

Experimental Procedure
One hundred ninety grams (mean soil depth = 32 mm) of air-dried soil was packed into Falcon Bottle Top Filter (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NY) units with a 38-mm nylon filter in the bottom outlet. Soil columns were kept under a laboratory hood to prevent airborne contamination.

Effects of four solution treatments were evaluated—dis-tilled water and three concentrations of FF extract: FF-high, FF-medium, and FF-low. Triplicate samples of each soil were prepared for each treatment. Packed columns received 0.1 L of solution (equivalent to 34 mm in depth) every 3 d for 1 yr; cumulative solution addition per column was 11.8 L (equivalent to 4000 mm in depth). Dissolved OC was measured in solution samples collected before and after percolation through the soil column using a Shimadzu TOC 5000 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc., Columbia, MD) (high-temperature, Pt-catalyzed combustion). Solution samples were frozen prior to DOC analysis. The percentage of water yield following the first solution addition was 84 + 5, 84 + 6, 84 + 6, and 78 + 8 for the Hermon, Marlow, Success, and Lombard soils, respectively. The percentage of water yield was similar or slightly higher for subsequent solution additions. The solution chemistry was analyzed five times during the course of the experiment: Days 69, 165, 228, 285, and 357, corresponding to cumulative volumes of 2.3, 5.5, 7.6, 9.5, and 12.0 L of solution passed through each column, respectively. One-milliliter subsamples of the outflow from each leaching event were bulked during the last four collection periods for determination of DOC. The subsamples for individual columns were bulk sampled. The outflow from the first collection period was not bulk sampled; a single outflow sample was collected after 23 solution additions.

Following the 1-yr leaching treatments, the percentage of OC (Perkin Elmer CHN analyzer), the percentage of LOI (600°C for 16 h), and sodium pyrophosphate extractable Al, Fe, and C were determined for samples from each soil-solution treatment, and from untreated soils. Sodium pyrophosphate extractable Fe and Al (Alp and Fep) were determined following the methods of Ross and Wang (1993). The Alp and Fep are typically equated with organically complexed forms of these constituents. Concentrations of Fe and Al in pyrophosphate extracts were measured using a Beckman Direct Current Plasma Emission Spectrometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). Carbon content of the pyrophosphate extracts was measured using a Shimadzu TOC 5000 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer to assess the percentage of Cp. Three thin-sections were made from one column of each soil-solution treatment, and from a packed column of untreated soil materials. Ten randomly selected locations were identified on each slide and 81 points on a grid were counted at each location (total points counted per column = 2430) to determine the abundance of organo-metallic coatings (Drees and Ransom 1994).

Differences between soil–solution treatments were determined using ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Soil physical and chemical properties were examined with linear regression. A paired two-sample t-test was used to determine if solution and soil measures of OC accumulation were significantly different. Relationships among soil chemical and physical properties and between soil solution chemistry were assessed using Pearson's correlation. For all statistical analyses, statistical significance was established at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Dissolved Organic Carbon Retention from Solution
All soils retained DOC at all levels of FF leachate treatment. The Hermon, Marlow and Lombard soils retained less DOC under FF-low concentrations than for the FF-medium or FF-high treatments (Fig. 1) . The difference in net retention between the FF-medium and FF-high treatment was significant only for the Lombard soil (P < 0.001). The Lombard soil retained significantly more DOC (245 mmol C g-1 of soil) with the FF-high treatment than the other three soils (<158 mmol C g-1 of soil) leached with FF-high (P < 0.05). This difference is consistent with the relatively high surface area of the Lombard soil.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Dissolved organic C retention for each soil during the 1-yr weathering period. The error bars are one standard deviation. For all samples, n = 3.

 
Influence of Dissolved Organic Carbon Concentration on Soil Chemistry
Following the year of leaching, soils leached with DOC solutions had significantly lower pH values than soils leached with distilled water (P < 0.05) (Table 3). The soils leached with distilled water generally had a lower percentage of LOI than the corresponding untreated soil, although the differences were not statistically significant (Table 3). Soils treated with FF leachates had a higher percentage of LOI values than the distilled water treatments. Only the Marlow soil exhibited significant differences in the percentage of LOI among the FF-leachate treatments (P < 0.03); the percentage of LOI increased with increased DOC in the input solutions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean values for pH, weight loss-on-ignition (LOI), CHN-C, and sodium pyrophosphate extractable Al, Fe, and C (Alp, Fep, and Cp). For pH and LOI, n = 3; Fep, Alp, and CHN-C, n = 2.

 
The Fep and Cp contents and percentage of CHN-C increased with increasing C input (Table 3). The percentage of Cp for the FF-medium and FF-high treatments were significantly different (P < 0.01) than the distilled water treatment of the same soil. The net (treatment–untreated soil) percentage of Fep, Cp, and Alp, were all positively correlated with the net percentage of LOI (r > 0.60, P < 0.005). There were high correlations between net (treatment–untreated soil) CHN-C and net percentage of LOI and Cp. The CHN values must be interpreted with caution. The error associated with the CHN analyzer was +0.3%, which is higher than almost all of the values reported. The values are included as a potential relative measure of the percentage of C between treatments. The high correlations between the percentage of CHN-C and the percentage of LOI and the percentage of Cp support the use of CHN data in this manner. Based upon correlation of CHN-C values and the percentage of LOI, LOI in these samples is ~50% OC. We will use this value here as it is in agreement with our pyrophosphate extractable C data as well as results from other investigations of the OC content and LOI values in podzolized sands and mineral soils (LOI as 38–55% OC) (Goldin, 1987; David, 1988; Lowther et al., 1990). However, the CHN-C values should not be taken as an absolute measure of OC in these samples.

Micromorphology
In thin sections of the soil columns, organo-metallic coatings appeared as orange-brown to dark brown deposits on the edges of grains. There were visible differences among solution treatments. The distilled water-treated soils had noticeably cleaner grains than the soils treated with FF leachate (Fig. 2a,b,c) . The soils treated with FF-low leachate had occasional small pockets of light orange-brown coatings (Fig. 2b). The FF-medium and FF-high treatments had larger pockets of coatings as well as thin coatings surrounding entire grains. In the FF-high soils, the organo-metallic coatings were thicker and generally darker brown than the other treatments (Fig. 2c). The distilled water treatments had low net (treatment–untreated soil) abundance of grain coatings (<0.5%). The abundance of organo-metallic coatings on grains increased with increasing concentration of DOC in the leachate solution (Fig. 3) . There were no significance differences among soils with the same solution treatment. The amount of grain coatings in FF-high treatments was significantly greater than in the distilled water and FF-low treatments for each soil (P < 0.01). Only the Lombard soil FF-high treatment had a greater amount of coatings than the FF-medium treatment (P < 0.001). Of the soil chemical properties investigated, net abundance of coatings was most strongly related to the net percentage of LOI and Cp (r > 0.60; P < 0.01). Abundance of coatings was also positively correlated with the net percentage of pyrophosphate Fep, and Alp (r > 0.45; P < 0.05).



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Examination of thin-sections for the columns allowed for comparison of accumulation of organo-metallic coatings among solution treatments. The photomicrographs above are of the Success soil treated with (a) distilled water, (b) low concentration of forest floor leachate, and (c) high concentration of forest floor leachate.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The net abundance of coatings (treated – untreated soil) on grains following the one year leaching experiment. The error bars are one standard deviation. For all samples, n = 3.

 
Net grain coating abundance was most strongly correlated to net DOC retention (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) (Fig. 4) . Based on the strong correlations of Fep to grain coating abundance, solution chemistry, the percentage of LOI, and the percentage of Cp, it appears that the grain coatings are at least partially composed of OC and Fe. Dissolved OC retention was positively correlated with the net percentage of LOI, CHN-C, Cp and Fep (r > 0.60; P < 0.03). Measures of soil OC accumulation (net Cp, CHN-C, and 50% LOI), however, account for only 32 to 46% of the amount of DOC lost from solution. Even if a higher value of OC is assumed for LOI (e.g., 55%) the amount of OC accumulated on soil was only 50% of DOC retention as measured by solution chemistry (Fig. 5) .



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The relationship between solution (µmol DOC retained per gram of soil) and the percentage of abundance of coatings as a result of leaching with DOC solutions (r = 0.84).

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The relationships between solution (net DOC retention) and soil measures of net organic C retention (net change in the percentage of loss on ignition, pyrophosphate extractable C and CHN-C). Percentage of loss-on-ignition is assumed to be 50% organic C in this investigation. See text for further details. The 1:1 line is the relationship expected if all C retained on the soil is present at the end of the experiment.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The initial physical (surface area) and chemical (pH, percentage of OC, and Alp and Fep content) properties of the soils did not explain the differences in DOC retention patterns among these soils. A more in-depth investigation of the relationship between DOC dynamics and soil mineralogy may improve our understanding of factors controlling DOC retention. The correlation between DOC retention and soil surface area was significant only in soils leached with the FF-high leachate, where DOC retention increased with increasing surface area. For the Hermon, Marlow, and Success soils, there was no significant difference in the amount of DOC retained between the FF-medium and FF-high treatments, despite twice the amount of DOC added to the FF-high soils. This retention pattern may be attributed to reaching a saturation point, or covering the available amount of surface sites with OC.

Mayer (1994a)(b) has extensively examined the relationship between particle surface area and OC content of soils and sediments. The monolayer equivalent, a single-layer of OC covering all mineral surfaces, was calculated to be equivalent to 0.86 mg OC m-2 of soil surface area (Mayer, 1994b). Following 1 yr of leaching, the soils retained between 0.05 and 0.92 mg OC m-2, based on soil solution data, which assumes minimal microbial decomposition of DOC. The FF-medium and FF-high treatments for the Hermon, Marlow, and Success soils are at or near the level of monolayer coverage following the 1 yr of solution treatment. The Lombard materials, with at least twice the surface area of the other soils had only 0.48 mg OC m-2. The net accumulation of OC based on soil chemistry was significantly lower (mean 0.2 mg OC m-2; P < 0.01) than the estimates based on solution chemistry.

Our results confirm that changes in soil chemical properties are the direct outcome of leaching by DOC-rich solutions. Leaching with DOC, especially high concentrations, resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of LOI, CHN-C, and Cp. Examination of the changes in soil solution chemistry indicates high net loss of DOC from solution during leaching. Results of this investigation suggest that abiotic retention of DOC may not have been the only factor involved in removing DOC from solution (Fig. 5). The amount of OC accumulated on soil surfaces, based upon the percentage of LOI (LOI = 50% OC, this investigation; Nelson and Sommers, 1982; Goldin, 1987; David, 1988; Lowther et al., 1990), the percentage of Cp and CHN-C, was well below (32–46%) the amount of OC retained based upon solution chemistry. However, it must be noted that because of the sampling scheme during the first few months of the column study, our final calculations of DOC loss from solution may be overestimated by an average of 5% (range = 4–6%) (see McCracken, 1998 for additional details). Even with the correction for the possible overestimation of DOC retention on soil, DOC retention based upon solution chemistry was much higher than the OC content measured via LOI, Cp, and CHN-C. From our data, it is not possible to determine whether microbes utilized DOC in solution or if decomposition of sorbed DOC followed abiotic retention on surfaces. This missing C may have been released as CO2 or may have been leached as carbonic acid. In any case, there is a significant discrepancy between the amount of OC removed from solution and the amount of OC on soil surfaces, thus clearly indicating that examinations of soil OC and DOC dynamics based entirely on solution chemistry are not a complete and accurate measure of C retention or long-term C storage capacity in soils.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
This investigation focused on interactions between organic and mineral soil constituents during initial stages of experimental pedogenesis by examining changes in soil and solution chemistry in a laboratory setting. This dual approach allows for a more complete understanding of the processes involved in soil formation than would either approach alone. Previous shorter-term investigations of DOC retention based on solution chemistry (McDowell and Wood, 1984; Qualls and Haines, 1992) indicate that abiotic retention is the major mechanism responsible for the decline in DOC concentrations in soil solution. The net loss of DOC from solution during percolation through the column (Fig. 1) coupled with the increase in OC in the soils confirms the importance of abiotic sorption in controlling DOC concentrations, yet our soil chemistry data also suggests an important role for microbial utilization in longer-term experiments. Examination of the dynamics of DOC and soil OC indicates that abiotic retention of DOC plays an important role in accumulation of OC in soils, yet because of the high potential for microbial utilization of DOC and soil OC, both solution and soil chemistry must be investigated. By pairing solution and soil chemistry data during examinations of C turnover and C sequestration, it is likely that we will gain a better understanding of the rate of these processes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Laura Morton, Jeff Merriam, Diana McKenzie, and Mindy Wardell for assistance with field and laboratory work. This research was funded in part by the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of New Hampshire. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for thoughtful comments that improved the manuscript.

Received for publication March 20, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. R. Moore and J. Turunen
Carbon Accumulation and Storage in Mineral Subsoil beneath Peat
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2004; 68(2): 690 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
P.-A. Jacinthe, P. M. Groffman, and A. J. Gold
Dissolved Organic Carbon Dynamics in a Riparian Aquifer: Effects of Hydrology and Nitrate Enrichment
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 1365 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCracken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCracken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. V.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCracken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Humic Substances
Right arrow Pedology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome