SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agbenin, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by van Raij, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Agbenin, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by van Raij, B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Agbenin, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by van Raij, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Kinetics
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Soil Chemistry
Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:1108-1114 (2001)
© 2001 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-2—SOIL CHEMISTRY

Kinetics and Energetics of Phosphate Release from Tropical Soils Determined by Mixed Ion-Exchange Resins

John O. Agbenin*,a and Bernardo van Raijb

a Dep. of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
b Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Caixa Postal 69, 13820-000 Jaguariuna (SP), Brazil

* Corresponding author (Agbenin{at}abu.edu.ng)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Kinetic information on soil P release is required to optimize P fertilizer use efficiency in agricultural production and develop guidelines for the disposal of P-rich wastes onto the land. We determined the kinetics and energy changes of P release from tropical soils by mixed ion-exchange resin. Phosphate release patterns were determined with or without shaking and at three temperatures: 298, 308, and 333 K. Phosphate release patterns determined as P uptake by the exchange resins were best described by diffusion models. The nature of diffusional limitation was discriminated on the basis of activation energies (Ea), which ranged from 42.03 to 48.72 kJ mol-1. The range of Ea was consistent with, and close to, 42.1 kJ mol-1 for intraparticle diffusion-controlled ion-exchange reactions. The P diffusion coefficients ranged from 2.81 to 4.71 x to 10-13 m2 s-1 under shaking conditions, but decreased to 1.42 to 2.68 x 10-13 m2 s-1 for nonshaking conditions probably because of large films that developed around the resin beads under static or nonshaking conditions. The free energy of activation {Delta}GO{ddagger} and entropy of activation {Delta}SO{ddagger} were lower than those of soils studied by means of resin bags indicating favorable P exchange reactions and less stearic inhibition for the resins. The enthalpy of activation {Delta}HO{ddagger} for the overall P exchange reactions was strongly endothermic.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
IN THE LAST 15 years, there has been a considerable amount of research on the use and adaptation of mixed ion-exchange resins for routine soil testing for macro- and micronutrients (Raij et al., 1986; Yang and Skogley, 1992; Agbenin et al., 1999). The purpose of a cation sink in mixed extraction of available P is to stimulate the dissolution of soluble and some sparingly soluble P compounds (Robinson et al., 1992) which, otherwise, would not readily participate in phosphate exchange reactions with ion-exchange resins, but are nonetheless important for residual and long-term P availability in soils. Soils testing and calibration with ion-exchange resins for fertilizer-P recommendation and management can be improved if the kinetic processes that regulate P release from the soils and uptake by exchange resins are understood.

The kinetics of P release and sorption in soils is a subject of importance in soil and environmental sciences primarily because P uptake by plants spans over time. Thus, kinetic information is required to properly characterize the P supplying capacity of soils, to design fertilizer-P management to optimize efficiency, to reduce environmental pollution, and to develop guidelines for the disposal of P-rich wastes onto the land (Skopp, 1986). Another reason for kinetic study is to obtain information on reaction mechanisms (Skopp, 1986).

Mechanisms of P release and sorption reactions with soil particles are complex, considering either the types of adsorbents or the numerous kinetic expressions that have been used to describe these processes. Several reports, mainly from temperate soils, have dealt with the kinetics of P uptake by anion-exchange resins in soils, but the kinetic interpretations are still conflicting. Amer et al. (1955) reported that P adsorption by anion-exchange resin from soil solution could be described by two or three simultaneous first-order rate processes, while Griffin and Jurinak (1974) reported pseudo first-order reaction. Vaidyanathan and Talibudden (1970) showed that P uptake rate by ion-exchange resins in some British soils was limited by intraparticle diffusion, an idea rejected by Bache and Ireland (1980), who reported that P adsorption by anion-exchange resins in the chloride or bicarbonate form did not conform to intraparticle diffusion-controlled reaction in other British soils. Dalal (1974) concluded no mechanistic interpretation that the kinetics of P uptake by anion-exchange resins in some tropical soils followed a fractional rate equation. Soldano and Boyd (1953) indicated that P uptake rate in a free electrolyte solution was controlled by several simultaneous processes of film diffusion or first-order rate chemical kinetics at the surface. Yang and Skogley (1992), using resin bags, concluded that diffusion appeared to be the rate-limiting step but did not explicitly distinguish the nature of diffusional limitation. The objectives of this study were to assess the diffusion kinetics and energy relations of P release from tropical soils determined by mixed resins.


    THEORY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In soil–resin–solution systems, the adsorption of P from soils by ion-exchange resins can be limited by diffusion or chemical exchange reactions. Two types of diffusional limitation might occur: (i) diffusion through a bounding-film around the resin bead and soil particle, or (ii) diffusion within the resin particle or soil particle (intraparticle diffusion). If diffusion through a bounding-film around the resin or soil particle is rate-limiting, the rate of transfer across the film can be described by Eq. [1] (Agbenin and Raij, 1999) originally derived by Boyd et al. (1947).

(1)
where kd is the apparent rate of diffusion across the film, Q is the amount of P adsorbed by resin at time t, and Q{infty} is equilibrium adsorption. Data of P uptake by ion-exchange resins obeying Eq. [1] does not conclusively exclude chemical exchange reaction as the rate-limiting step since an equivalent expression can be derived from the law of mass action. For example, consider a monovalent exchange reaction between Cl- charged resin and H2PO-4 in soil solution as follows:

(2)
if mH2PO-4 and mCl- are the concentrations of H2PO-4 and Cl- in solution, and nR–H2PO4 and nR–Cl are the moles of H2PO-4 and Cl adsorbed by resin, following Boyd et al. (1947), the amount of P uptake by the resins at time t can be written as:

(3)
where E = nR–H2PO4 + nR–Cl, ke = k1mH2PO4 + k2nR–Cl, and k1 and k2 are the forward and backward rate, respectively. At equilibrium adsorption Q{infty}, Eq. [3] can be simplified (Boyd et al., 1947) to:

(4)
where ke is the exchange rate constant. Note that Eq. [4] is the integrated form of Eq. [1]; hence kinetic data obeying Eq. [1] does not exclude exchange reaction as the rate-limiting step.

Theory of intraparticle diffusion of ions in ion-exchange resins was well developed by Boyd et al. (1947). The fractional equilibrium adsorption of P diffusing through a spherical particle of radius ro with initially uniform concentration, and with the surface concentration of the diffusing ion assumed constant can be described by Eq. [5].

(5)
where D is the diffusion coefficient, n is any natural number, {pi} is a constant, and all other terms are as defined above. If the concentration of the diffusing ion at the surface is assumed constant, one form of solution to Fick's second law applicable to diffusion in solids is the parabolic expression (Crank, 1975; Aharoni and Sparks, 1991).

(6)


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental Soils
Four soils from the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, were used for the study. Selected properties of the soils are given in Table 1. The soil pH was determined in 0.01 M CaCl2. Exchangeable Ca, Mg, and K were displaced by neutral ammonium acetate. Calcium and Mg in the extracts were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and K by flame photometry. Organic C was determined by dichromate oxidation technique, while cation-exchange capacity was the summation of exchangeable bases and total exchangeable acidity (H + Al). Details of analytical methods are described in Page et al. (1982). Oxalate Fe (Feo) and dithionite citrate bicarbonate Fe (Fed) were determined by the methods described by McKeague and Day (1966) and Mehra and Jackson (1960). Some properties of the experimental soils and their classification in U.S. soil taxonomy at the order level are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected physicochemical properties of the soils used in the study.

 
Resin Characteristics and Experimental Details
The ion-exchange resins were a strong base anion-exchange resin (Amberlite IRA-400) and a strong acid cation-exchange resin (Amberlite IRA-120) (Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA). The Amberlite IRA-400 has an anion-exchange capacity of 140 cmolc dm-3 and Amberlite-120 has a cation-exchange capacity of 195 cmolc dm-3. The cation- and anion-exchange resins have one monofunctional active site, each made of N-alkyl group for the anion exchange resin, and sulfonic acid group for the cation-exchange resin with standard crosslinking. The resin particle size (ro) was 0.5 mm. The resin were presaturated with Na+ and HCO-3 following the procedure described in details by Agbenin and Raij (1999) and Agbenin et al. (1999).

Bicarbonate charged resin buffered at pH 8.5 has been the standard extraction method for available P since 1983 (Raij et al., 1986). We chose HCO-3 charged resins for P extraction, apart from their giving strong correlation with plant uptake and responses to applied P in Brazilian soils, because HCO-3 ions buffer the soil suspension against pH fluctuation during the extraction process.

Twenty-five cubic centimeters of deionized water were added to 2.5 cm3 of air-dried and sieved <2-mm soil. A glass marble (1.8-cm diam.) was added. The flask was stoppered and agitated for 15 min in a rotatory motion shaker at 220 cycles per minute to disaggregate the soils with a view to facilitating separation of resins from soil particles. The glass marble was removed and 2.5 cm3 of mixed cation- and anion-exchange resins presaturated with Na+ and HCO-3 were added to the soil suspension. Two batches were prepared for shaking and nonshaking with two replicates. The sample set for agitation was transferred to the shaker, while the stationary set (nonshaking) was left on a laboratory bench.

Initial kinetic runs were made up to 96 h at a laboratory temperature of 22 + 2°C. The soil–resin suspension was transferred with jet stream of water into a 0.4-mm polyester netting sieve to separate resin from soil. Phosphate sorption by mixed ion-exchange resins was also carried out at 298, 308, and 333 K in a thermostatically controlled water following the procedure outlined above, except that agitation was less vigorous in the waterbath, and an 8-h time scale was chosen for this experiment to avoid leaving the waterbath on overnight for safety reasons. The resin was rinsed with deionized water to remove any soil particles and transferred into a clean polystyrene flask and extracted with acidified NH4Cl (1 M NH4Cl in 0.1 M HCl). Phosphate in the extract was determined colorimetrically by the method of Murphy and Riley (1962).

All kinetic runs were made in duplicate, and where variability between dulcet results exceeded 5%, the duplicate analysis was repeated. In some cases, two to three repetitions were carried out for each adsorption point to obtain consistent results. The means of duplicate analyses were reported.

Data Analysis
The fit of Eq. [1], [4] and [6] to the time-dependent P release patterns was assessed by R2 and standard error (SE). Equations [1] and [4] were linearized by fitting log (1 - Q/Q{infty}) vs. t with a slope determined by (ke/2.303) (Boyd et al., 1947; Agbenin and Raij, 1999).

Because of the infinite series in Eq. [5], a numerical solution was found. Thus, by solution to this equation for spherical particles, values of D{pi}2t/r2o as a function of Q/Q{infty} were determined (Table 2). The value of D{pi}2t/r2o for each experimental Q/Q{infty} was interpolated from Table 2 (Keay and Wild, 1961) from which the internal diffusion coefficients were calculated. For intraparticle diffusion-controlled ion-exchange reactions, the rate parameter D{pi}2/r2o or D{pi}2t/r2o divided by the reaction time t is constant for each experimental Q/Q{infty} value up to 0.80, beyond which experimental errors become magnified (Boyd et al., 1947).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Solution to Eq. [5] showing the rate parameter (D{pi}2t/r2o) for each fractional equilibrium attainment (QQ{infty}) for spherical particles.

 
The effect of temperature of P release from soils was assessed by the Arrhenius equation:

(7)
where k is the rate of P release, A is a constant, and Ea is the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant, and T is temperature (K). When kinetic data obey the Arrhenius equation, a plot of 1nk as a function of the reciprocal of temperature (1/T) is linear, and Ea is calculated from the slope of regression line.

The rate coefficient is related to free energy of activation {Delta}GO{ddagger} (Adamson, 1969):

(8)
where k is Bolzmann constant, h is the Planck's constant, and R and T have their usual meanings. From the Eyring rate theory (Laidler, 1965), the entropy of activation ({Delta}SO{ddagger}) can be calculated from the rate constant [Eq. 9] or from its relation with {Delta}G0{ddagger} [Eq. 10]

(9)

(10)
where {Delta}HO{ddagger} is the enthalpy of activation calculated from its relation with Ea [Eq. 11] as given by Griffin and Jurinak (1974) or with {Delta}GO{ddagger} and {Delta}SO{ddagger} [Eq. 10]

(11)


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Time-Dependent Phosphate Release
With the initial kinetic runs up to 96 h, equilibrium P uptake by the resins was slowly approached by 20 h. With the nonshaking experiment, P uptake by the mixed ion resins continued, but not significantly so after 32 h (Fig. 1). Before 15 min, there was no measurable P desorption with the nonshaking batch especially for Soil 1 and Soil 4 in contrast to the shaking. On the basis of these initial results, 5 min to 24-h reaction period was selected for shaking, and 15 min to 32 h for nonshaking batch. The equilibrium release (Q{infty}) used for our analysis was taken to be the P uptake between 24 and 96 h with shaking, and between 32 and 96 h without shaking. Shaking increased the desorption of labile P in Soil 1 and Soil 4, but had no substantial effect in Soil 2 and Soil 3 as determined by resin P uptake.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The time-dependent phosphate sorption by mixed cation-anion exchange resins. (A = shaking and B = nonshaking.)

 
The P release patterns determined by the mixed ion-exchange resins were better modeled by the parabolic expression (Fig. 2) than by film-diffusion equation as judged from R2 and SE values (Table 3). Since linear relations were found between P sorbed by the mixed resins and the square root of time, the implied boundary conditions for deriving the parabolic expression can be considered fulfilled (Bruemmer et al., 1988), and the kinetics of the P uptake process was most likely limited by intraparticle diffusion. However, conformity to a parabolic model cannot conclusively support intraparticle diffusion mechanism (Skopp, 1986).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Phosphate-sorption kinetics by mixed cation-anion exchange resins as described by the parabolic model (A = shaking and B = nonshaking) where F is fractional equilibrium plotted as a function of the square root of time (h).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Goodness-of-fit statistics and the rate parameters{dagger} of three kinetic models fitted to phosphate release determined by phosphate sorption by mixed-ion exchange resins from some tropical soils.

 
The fairly constant values of D{pi}2/r2o for experimental Q/Q{infty} values up to 0.80 (Table 4), especially under shaking conditions further supported intraparticle diffusion mechanism. The mean diffusion coefficients (D) ranged from 2.81 to 4.71 x 10-13 m2 s-1 for the shaking experiment, and 1.42 to 2.68 x 10-13 m2 s-1 for nonshaking (Table 4). These D values were 104 times lower than the diffusion of P in solution, but are fairly consistent with P diffusion in soil solids ranging from 10-13 and 10-14 m2 s-1 (Nye, 1979). The D values also compared favorably with 0.9 to 4.8 x 10-13 m2 s-1 for P diffusion coefficients in mixed Amberlite IRA-Cl anion exchange resins (Rohm and Haas) and Zeocarb 225-Na cation exchange resin (Zeotech, Albuquerque, NM) in United Kingdom soils (Vaidyanathan and Talibudeen, 1970), but were, however, lower than the self-diffusion coefficient of P (5.70 x 10-12 to 8.9 to 10-10 m2 s-1) in Dowex-2 ion exchanger resins (Dow Chemical, Midland, MI) in a free electrolyte solution (Soldano and Boyd, 1953) probably because of the viscosity of soil solution compared with a free P solution. Further, the counter diffusion of P (HPO2-4, HCO-4) ions and HCO-3 in ion-exchange resins will depend on the relative ion selectivities of the resins.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. The fractional equilibrium F, the rate parameter (D{pi}2t/r2o) x 10-5 s-1, and the diffusion coefficient D x 10-13 m2 s-1 of the particle diffusion model (Eq. [5]) for describing the kinetics of P release determined by P sorption by mixed cation-anion exchange resins from tropical soils under shaking and non-shaking condition.{dagger}

 
In a soil–resin–solution system, as distinct from a resin–solution system, the difficult question to resolve is whether the intraparticle diffusion limitation is within the resins or soil aggregates or particles. The data from this study did not directly answer this question. However, a number of inferences can be derived from the data. For D{pi}2/r2o to be constant for each experimental Q/Q{infty} value (Table 4), ro has to be fairly constant, as would be expected for the resin beads compared with soil aggregates or particles. If diffusion within the resins was a rate-limiting step, the rate parameter D{pi}2/r2o (Table 4) and or kd (Table 3) should not vary drastically with shaking (Petruzzelli et al., 1991). Actually, in Soil 1 and Soil 4, kd or D{pi}2/r2o values were reasonably close for the shaking and nonshaking. Thus, the rate-limiting step, in this case, appeared to be intraparticle diffusion within the resins.

The deviation in D{pi}2/r2o or kd for Soil 2 and Soil 3 between shaking and nonshaking might be due to higher initial rates of P release than the rate of diffusion across the bounding film at the resin exchanger surfaces. This would make film diffusion rate limiting or the rate-controlling step at the early stages of the exchange reactions, especially at t < 2 h (Sposito, 1989; Helfferich, 1962) until an equilibrium between the rate of release and diffusion across the films was established. Thereafter, intraparticle diffusion apparently became the rate-limiting step in the exchange reactions.

Under nonshaking conditions, however, both film- and intraparticle diffusion can be rate limiting for ion-exchange reaction (Ogwada and Sparks, 1986) because of the development of large films around the resin particles. Implicit in the particle diffusion equation [Eq. 5] is that the rate parameter D{pi}2/r2o determines the time to achieve a given fraction of equilibrium (F = Q/Q{infty}), which varies inversely with r2o (Boyd et al., 1947). Under nonshaking conditions, ro would tend to increase because of the bounding films around the resin beads, and thus reduce D{pi}2/r2o for the nonshaking in contrast to shaking conditions.

Activation Energies and Thermodynamic Parameters
The temperature-dependent P release rates plotted as a function of the reciprocal of absolute temperature (I/T) yielded Arrhenius linear relations (Fig. 3). The activation energies Ea deduced from the slopes of the Arrhenius plots are given in Table 5. Activation energy is a measure of the energy to be overcome, and thus can be interpreted as the relative index of the binding strength of phosphate ions. Thus, the relatively low Ea for Soil 2 and Soil 3 indicated relatively less rigid binding and rapid release compared to Soil 1 and Soil 4.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The influence of temperature on rate coefficients of P release from tropical soils determined by mixed cation-anion exchange resins as described Arrhenius equation.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. The R2 values, intercept, and slope parameters of the linear Arrhenius equation, and the energy of activation Ea of phosphate release determined by mixed cation-anion exchange resins from tropical soils.

 
The magnitude of Ea is a useful parameter for differentiating intraparticle from film diffusion-controlled ion-exchange reactions (Boyd et al., 1947; Sparks, 1985). Activation energies ranging from 17 to 21 kJ mol-1 suggest a film diffusion-controlled ion-exchange reaction, while Ea ranging from 21 to 42 suggests an intraparticle diffusion mechanism (Boyd et al., 1947; Sparks, 1985). The Ea values in this study are thus consistent with intraparticle diffusion mechanism.

The {Delta}HO{ddagger} of activation is a measure of the amount of heat energy gained or lost in transferring P from the soil through solution to form an activated surface complex on the resins (Griffin and Jurinak, 1974). The {Delta}HO{ddagger} values were positive (Table 6) and close to those reported for P interaction calcite by Griffin and Jurinak (1974). The positive {Delta}HO{ddagger} values seemed to indicate that P exchange reactions with resin exchange surfaces required considerable net heat absorption. Helfferich indicated that the heat gained or lost in the course of anion exchange reaction is approximately 8 to 9 kJ mol-1. Consequently, Taylor and Ellis (1978) proposed that consumption of heat for P exchange reactions in Dowex1-X8 resins in excess of 8 to 9 kJ mol-1 suggested the formation of double electrostatic bonds between P and the resin exchange surfaces. The {Delta}HO{ddagger} values, far in excess of 8 to 9 kJ mol-1 in this study, suggested that HPO2-4 might be the predominantly sorbed ion. This can be further deduced from the equilibrium pH determined for the soil–resin–solution after agitation. The mean pH of the soil–resin–solution was 7.5 + 0.1 for Soil 1, 7.6 + 0.2 for Soil 2, and 7.2 + 0.0 and 7.3 + 0.0 for Soil 3 and Soil 4, respectively, after shaking for 16 to 24 h, suggesting that the predominant ions diffusing into the resins were HPO2-4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. The free energy of activation {Delta}GO{ddagger}, enthalpy {Delta}HO{ddagger} and entropy of activation {Delta}SO{ddagger} of P release as determined by mixed cation-anion exchange resins from the soils.{dagger}

 
The {Delta}GO{ddagger} of activation, a relative measure of the change in free energy from free P state to an activated P complex on the surface of the resin adsorbents (Griffin and Jurinak, 1974), ranged from 92.0 to 98.4 kJ mol-1. These values were slightly higher than {Delta}GO{ddagger} for P adsorption by calcite (Griffin and Jurinak, 1974) probably because of rapid reactions between Ca2+ and P ions in that system. But the {Delta}GO{ddagger} values were, however, lower than {Delta}GO{ddagger} for P sorption by resin bags in some temperate soils (Yang and Skogley, 1992).

The values of {Delta}SO{ddagger} of activation were relatively low and negative (Table 4). The negative entropy change can be attributed to restricted or constrained movement imposed by the binding of P ions to exchange sites in the resins (Lasaga, 1981). The {Delta}SO{ddagger} for P uptake by the mixed resins from these soils was lower than P sorption by calcite (Griffin and Jurinak, 1974) probably because of the high activity of Ca2+ in that system. Similarly, the {Delta}SO{ddagger} values were lower than those reported for resin bags by Yang and Skogley (1992), indicating a relatively low degree of stearic inhibition between the P ions and the resin reactive surfaces.

Perhaps, differences in resin characteristics and selectivity of P ions would partly account for the variation in {Delta}SO{ddagger}, {Delta}HO{ddagger}, and {Delta}GO{ddagger} for P exchange reactions with resin surfaces in this study from the values reported by Yang and Skogley (1992). Further, the P ions apparently diffusing to the resins in our study seemed to be mostly HPO2-4 ions as deduced from the equilibrium pH. Ionic size increases from H2PO-4 to HPO2-4; hence an increasingly positive entropy might be required to partially overcome the increased activation energy in order to increase the self-diffusion coefficient of HPO2-4 (Soldano and Boyd, 1953). Thus, the possible occurrence of positive {Delta}SO{ddagger} with HPO2-4 diffusion would serve to make {Delta}SO{ddagger} less negative and {Delta}HO{ddagger} larger and more positive than those reported in Yang and Skogley (1992).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Phosphorus release kinetics from the soils determined by P sorption to mixed resins conformed to diffusion models. The magnitude of Ea was greater than Ea for film diffusion controlled exchange reaction, but consistent with intraparticle diffusion mechanism. Our results also suggested that under nonshaking conditions, both film diffusion and intraparticle diffusion limitation seemed to occur, while under shaking or agitation intraparticle diffusion appeared to be the rate-limiting step.

Intraparticle diffusion limitation in the resins with shaking, which is the standard resin P extraction method for fertilizer-P calibration and recommendation in these soils, implies that there can be no single value for resin extractable in a soil without specifying the type of resins because of possible differences in resin physical characteristics.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are grateful to the Brazilian Research Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for research fellowship to Institute of Agronomy, Campinas (IAC), and the Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS), Trieste, Italy, for travel support for one of us (JOA). We thank Dr. G. Adamian AVH Research Fellow, Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Giessen, Germany, for solution to Eq. [5]. We also thank the Institute of Soil Science, University of Giessen, for allowing one of us to repeat some aspects of this study.

Received for publication July 20, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agbenin, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by van Raij, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Agbenin, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by van Raij, B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Agbenin, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by van Raij, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Kinetics
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Soil Chemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome