Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:1638-1643 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America
DIVISION S-3-SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Effects of FreezeThaw and Soil Structure on Nitrous Oxide Produced in a Clay Soil
Eric van Bochove,
Danielle Prévost and
France Pelletier
Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
vanbochovee{at}em.agr.ca
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Freezing and thawing have been shown to cause significant soil physical and biological changes. The increase in denitrification following thawing may be attributed to the diffusion of organic substrates newly available to denitrifiers from disrupted soil aggregates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of freezing and thawing on N2O production in a clay soil under contrasting crop rotations and tillage practices. Laboratory experiments were conducted in soil slurries to favor substrate diffusion, in macroaggregate fractions separated by wet sieving to characterize the biologically active soil organic matter (SOM) pool, and in undisturbed soil cores to simulate field conditions. In slurries, a freezing and thawing cycle increased denitrification rates by 32%. Soil slurries from no-tillage under rotation (NTR) exhibited denitrification rates 92% higher than those from conventional till under continuous cereal (CTC). Macroaggregates fractions (0.252 and 25 mm) from both management systems increased their rates of C mineralization and denitrification activity by 95% following freezing, but the increases tended to be greater (57%) in small than in large macroaggregates. Higher rates of denitrification (55%) found in both aggregate fractions of NTR system were attributed to the higher mineralizable organic C content. Undisturbed soil cores sampled in November showed increased N2O production by 220% after thawing. This thawing effect was also significantly higher in cores from NTR than in those from CTC.
Abbreviations: CTC, conventional till under continuous cereal DEA, denitrification enzyme activity DR, denitrifying rate GC, gas chromatography NTR, no-tillage under rotation OM, organic matter SOM, soil organic matter WSA, water-stable aggregate distribution
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
NITROUS OXIDE is a radiactively active atmospheric trace gas with a long lifetime (150 yr) and is currently accounting for 2 to 4% of total greenhouse warming potential (Watson et al., 1992). Cultivated soils are thought to be a major source of anthropogenic N2O (Duxbury et al., 1993). Although the critical environmental factors responsible for N2O emissions are well understood, sources and sinks of N2O in agricultural soils are not yet fully quantified. One reason for this incomplete information is the lack of measurements in various agricultural systems (Mosier et al., 1996), especially during winter (Röver et al., 1998). Bremner et al. (1980) estimated that 6 to 21% of the annual N2O flux from agricultural land occurred during thawing of topsoil in spring. In cold temperate climates (e.g., Canada and northern Europe), some studies reported significant N2O losses from cultivated soils following freezethaw cycles in spring (Nyborg et al., 1997; Wagner-Riddle and Thurtell, 1998; Röver et al., 1998) or even during winter and snowmelt from unfrozen soils (van Bochove et al., 1996, 2000). The processes involved in N2O emissions during freeze and thaw are unclear, although several factors have been investigated (Röver et al., 1998). In Québec, Canada, seasonal variations in denitrification enzyme activities (DEA) were observed and significant DEA were measured in the coldest months of the year (Pelletier et al., 1999).
Thawing causes the disruption of soil structure, mostly of macroaggregates, and enhances microbial activity due to the release of organic C from plant and microbial detritus (Christensen and Christensen, 1991). The relationships between disruption of soil macroaggregates and availability of readily mineralizable substrates for denitrification may play an important role in the potential of a soil to produce N2O during a freezethaw event. Consequently, management-induced changes in aggregation may modify the denitrification potential of a soil. In fact, different long-term soil cropping and tillage practices have significant effects on the water-stable aggregate distribution (WSA) of macroaggregates (Tisdall and Oades, 1980; Elliott, 1986; Angers et al., 1993b). Among these practices, no-till increases aggregate stability and C and N content (Cambardella and Elliott, 1993; Angers and Carter, 1996). Stable macroaggregates are relatively enriched in labile C of recent origin (Elliott, 1986; Puget et al., 1995).
However, reduced tillage also reduces total soil porosity (Pagliai and De Nobili, 1993) and increases soil moisture content (Rice and Smith, 1982), a factor known to restrict O2 diffusion through soil. The presence of an anaerobic microsite at the center of soil aggregates is critical for the occurrence of denitrification (Sexstone et al., 1985).
Under circumstances of specific soil management practices, freezethaw cycles may cause physical disruption of soil structure, diffusion of soluble C, and changes in soil porosity that may promote denitrification and episodic N2O emissions. Under the Québec climate, in fall, agricultural soils undergo overnight freeze and thaw cycles. We performed various incubations in the laboratory to investigate the effect of freezethaw cycles on N2O production in soils under contrasting agricultural practices. Three types of incubations were carried out as follows: (i) soil slurries to determine denitrification activities in conditions that remove substrate diffusion constraints, (ii) fractions of macroaggregates to characterize the biologically active pool of SOM that may be associated with N2O production, (iii) soil cores to evaluate N2O production in conditions where diffusion is a function of the undisturbed soil structure.
 |
Materials and methods
|
|---|
Field Site and Soil Sampling
Cultivated plots were located at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Experimental Farm at La Pocatière, Québec, on a Kamouraska clay (Orthic Humic Gleysol). The long-term experimental plots were arranged in a split-plot design with four replicates. Crop sequence treatment was the main plot treatment and tillage practice was the subplot treatment (Angers et al., 1993a). Two treatments with contrasted croppingtillage combination treatments were selected: (i) no-tillage with a 2-yr barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) rotation (NTR) in the second year of rotation and (ii) conventional till moldboard plowing with continuous barley (CTC).
For incubation in slurries and on macroaggregates, three replicate soil samples (05 cm depth) were cored randomly from each plot on 5 Oct. 1995.
For incubation of the undisturbed soil structure, soil cores were collected in three replicates from each plot at the 0- to 5-cm depth on two sampling dates, 5 Oct. and 27 Nov. 1995. Stainless steel corers (i.d., 11 cm; height, 10 cm) were sharpened at one end and soil cores were collected with a driver system that allows a precise core of 5-cm depth.
Incubation Experiments
Denitrification Rate in Slurries
Sieved soil samples (6 mm) were frozen at -12°C for 20 to 24 h and then thawed for 25 min. Unfrozen controls were kept at 4°C before incubations started. After freezingthawing simulation, denitrifying rate (DR) was determined on four subsamples of each soil sample. The DR incubations were conducted at 25°C under anaerobic conditions in the presence of 10% acetylene (C2H2). Assay solution contained 10 mM NO-3 to provide nonlimiting electron acceptor. Glucose and chloramphenicol were not added to the solution (modified from Martin et al., 1988). The C2H2 was purified by bubbling successively through solutions of H2SO4 (2 M) and deionized water (Nanopure series 851 system, Barnstead/Thermolyne, Dubuque, IA) to remove traces of acetone. Gas samples were collected in vacutainers (Vacutainer Brand, Becton Dickinson and Co., Rutherford, NJ) at 0.5, 2, and 4 h after the incubation vessels were sealed. Incubation vessels were not shaken during incubation to minimize aggregates breaking.
Incubations of Macroaggregate Fractions
Prior to macroaggregate fractionation by wet sieving, soil samples were gently passed through a 6-mm sieve and kept at 4°C in crush-resistant air-tight containers. Field-moist soil samples were wetted under vacuum and constant head at 5 cm H2O during 30 min to minimize slaking of aggregates during wet sieving following the method of Le Bissonnais (1989). The separation into two macroaggregate size fractions (0.252 and 25 mm) was performed using an apparatus similar to that described by Bourget and Kemp (1957); operating conditions were 3.7-cm stroke at 29 cycles s-1 during 10 min. After wet sieving, macroaggregate fractions were equilibrated under constant head at 10 cm H2O. Soil water content was determined gravimetrically on each fraction, small macroaggregates (0.42 kg kg-1) were wetter than the large ones (0.30 kg kg-1). Aggregate fractions were divided into subsamples to measure (i) N2O and CO2 production during anaerobic incubation for denitrification following a freezethaw simulation and (ii) mineralization rate of organic C during aerobic incubation.
Anaerobic Incubations for Denitrification
Macroaggregates were confined in polyvinyl chloride cores (i.d., 5 cm; height, 3 cm) that were placed in 125-mL air-tight jars before freezing treatment at -12°C for 18 to 24 h. Unfrozen soil controls were kept at 4°C. After 20 min for thawing, the headspace of frozen and unfrozen jars was flushed with N2, and C2H2 (10%, v/v) was injected in jars to measure denitrification. Anaerobic N2O and CO2 accumulations were monitored during 3 h at 25°C using gas chromatography (GC) as described below.
Aerobic Incubations for Carbon Mineralization
Aerobic CO2 production was estimated during 27 d of incubation at 25°C. To characterize the biologically active SOM (Zibilske, 1994), the CO2 evolved was trapped in NaOH and the excess NaOH was titrated with standardized HCl after addition of BaCl2 and phenolphtalein. The pool of mineralizable C (C0, mg CO2C kg-1) and the corresponding mineralization coefficient (k, d-1) were estimated by fitting the data for the cumulative mineralized CT (mg CO2C kg-1) with a first-order kinetic model using nonlinear regression
 |
Incubations of Undisturbed Soil Cores
Undisturbed soil core incubations were performed in stainless steel pipes (i.d. 11 cm, height 10 cm) closed at each end with a neoprene sealed cover and equipped with independent recirculation gas systems. Unfrozen control cores were kept at 4°C. Frozen cores were put at -20°C for 18 h and then thawed at 25°C during 1 h before incubations started. The core headspace volume was estimated using pure Kr (Germon, 1980). The core and headspace atmosphere was recirculated during incubation by using sealed aquarium pumps (Elite 799, Mansfield, MA) operating at 10.35 x 103 Pa and air output of 1200 cm3 min-1. Soil cores were successively incubated during 3.5 h under aerobic (ambient air) and anaerobic (90% N2 + 10% C2H2, v/v) conditions, with the gas recirculation system. Gas samples were collected periodically (30 min) through rubber septa inserted in the cover and analyzed for N2O and CO2 by GC.
Gas Analysis
At sampling time, the air from incubation flasks or cores was sampled with syringes and drawn directly from the syringes into evacuated vials (7.5 mL) with Vacutainer septa (10-mL Vacutainers). The N2O and CO2 concentrations were analyzed by gas chromatography (Hewlett Packard 5890 series II, Wilmington, DE) equipped with an automatic sample injector system (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Swirzerland). The operating setup and conditions for CO2 were: a Porapak Q column (Chromatographic Specialties, Brockville, ON) (50°C) used with N2 as a carrier gas (40 mL min-1), CO2 was reduced to CH4 in a Ni catalyst tube coupled to the flame ionization detector (250°C). The operating setup and conditions for N2O were: a Porapak Q precolumn (0.91 m by 0.32 cm diam.) coupled to an analytical column (1.83 m by 0.32 cm diam.) used with Ar/CH4 as carrier gas (0.95:0.05 m3 m-3, 45 mL min-1), and an electron capture detector (250°C). The detection limit and precision were, respectively, 77 x 10-6 mol mol-1 and 16 x 10-6 mol mol-1 for CO2 analysis, and 70 x 10-9 mol mol-1 and 14 x 10-9 mol mol-1 N2O analysis.
The Kr concentrations were analyzed by gas chromatography (Hewlett Packard 5890). The operating conditions for Kr were: thermal conductivity detector (110°C), Porapak Q column (i.d. 0.32 cm; length 6 m), and carrier gas He (25 mL min-1).
Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS (SAS Institute, 1988). The data from DR assays were analyzed statistically using the ANOVA procedure. The data from incubation on macroaggregate fractions were first checked for homogeneity using Bartlett's test and then logarithmically transformed before ANOVA analysis. The C0 and k values calculated for the replicates of each aggregate size fraction and each treatment were analyzed using ANOVA. The data from the dynamic soil cores incubations were first checked for homogeneity using the Bartlett test and then analyzed using a nonparametric multiple comparison test, PROC RANK (Montgomery, 1984; Conover, 1980).
 |
Results and discussion
|
|---|
Effects of FreezeThaw and Agriculture Practice on Denitrifying Rate in Slurries
Both freezethaw and agricultural practices had a significant effect on DR (Fig. 1)
. Denitrification rates were higher in frozenthawed than in unfrozen treatments. In general, it is assumed that N is not limiting during anaerobic slurry incubation of agricultural soils (Myrold and Tiedje, 1985). Moreover, the addition of NO3 to the slurries of the present study assures that C substrate and/or denitrifying enzymes were the only limiting factors for denitrification. We also assume that breaking of aggregates was minimized under experimental conditions for DR. Therefore, the burst of denitrification after thawing probably resulted from the release of organic C substrates previously sequestered in aggregates that are disrupted by freezing or from microbial biomass and microfauna that are killed by the freezing process (Soulides and Allison, 1961; Bullock et al., 1988). The increases of 32% in denitrification following thawing were similar for both agricultural practices. Denitrification rates were 92% higher under NTR than under CTC. Because N was not limiting in slurry incubations, the higher denitrification rates in soils from NTR may be due to greater concentrations of mineralizable organic C in soils from this conservation practice than in CTC. Both no-till and red clover are agricultural practices known to increase the concentrations of mineralizable C and mineralizable N in soil (Odell et al., 1984; Sheaffer and Barnes, 1987). Although not significant, data collected from our experimental plots in September 1995 showed higher levels of organic C and total N in NTR than in CTC (Nicole Bissonnette, 2000, personal communication). Furthermore, on the same plots, Angers et al. (1993a) observed significant increases in microbial biomass C and hot waterextractable and acid-hydrolyzable carbohydrates due to the soil management and to a lesser extent to the rotation after 4 yr of no-till. The differences in concentrations of organic mater (OM) labile forms were also greater for the NT than for the CT in 1995. This is in agreement with other studies showing that soil conservation management systems (e.g., reduced tillage, rotation) result in higher aggregate stability and organic matter content than conventional systems (Angers et al., 1993b; Beare et al., 1994). Higher rates of denitrification in soils from NTR may also be attributed to differences in enzymes present in samples at the beginning of incubation, as the DR assay (adapted from Martin et al., 1988) was initially designed to show.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1 Effect of thawing and agriculture practices on denitrifying rate (DR) in soil slurries of conventional till continuous barley (CTC) and no-tillagebarleyred clover rotation (NTR) treatments. Agricultural practices and freeze treatments indicate significant differences (P < 0.0005 and 0.05); interaction between treatments was not significant. Vertical bars represent standard error of four replicates
|
|
Effects of FreezeThaw and Agriculture Practice on Denitrification in Macroaggregates
Freezethaw treatment and agricultural management systems showed significant effects on denitrification in macroaggregates (Fig. 2)
. Denitrification rates were 95% higher in frozen than in unfrozen macroaggregates
, and these increases were equivalent for both management systems. Macroaggregates from the NTR management system exhibited denitrification rates 55% higher than those from the CTC system
. There was no significant interaction between thawing and agricultural management treatments, but the increase in denitrification following freezethaw was 57% higher in small (0.252 mm) than in large (25 mm) macroaggregates
. Our results showed that a single short freezing and thawing cycle on macroaggregates increased denitrification activity by 95%. The highly significant relationship between denitrification and CO2 emissions
confirms that the burst of denitrification activity may be related to a substantial supply of organic C. This is in accordance with Bijay-Singh et al. (1988) who concluded that in the field, microaerophilic mineralizable C may often be a limiting factor for denitrification. Carbon rendered available for denitrification by freezethaw may originate from organic matter previously sequestered in aggregates that are broken down by freezethaw cycle (Soulides and Allison, 1961; Bullock et al., 1988) and from organisms that are killed by the freezing process (Christensen and Christensen, 1991). Forces disrupting aggregates are probably a result of ice crystals expanding in pores between particles, interrupting particle-to-particle bonds and effectively breaking the aggregates into smaller aggregates (Bullock et al., 1988).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 Effect of freezing on denitrification rates in 0.25- to 2- and 2- to 5-mm macroaggregate fractions from continuous barley under conventional till (CTC) and a barleyred clover rotation under no-till (NTR) management systems
|
|
Results obtained from C mineralization tests in the laboratory show some of the same tendencies as those observed during denitrification incubations. Indeed, the pool of mineralizable C (C0) was on average 65% higher in NTR than in CTR macroaggregates
and 45% higher in small than in large macroaggregates (
; Table 1)
. The higher C0 found in both aggregate fractions of the NTR management system may be responsible for the higher rates of denitrification observed in this system than in the CTC system. Some of the variations in the distribution of C0 between management systems is more likely attributable to tillage practices rather than to legume in the rotation because legumes did not significantly increase the labile OM contents in the soil (Nicole Bissonnette, 2000, personal communication). In no-tillage practices, particulate organic matter would be incorporated within macroaggregates, whereas in conventional tillage, aggregates are more subject to disruption, releasing aggregate-protected organic matter for mineralization (Beare et al., 1994). Although there were differences in the pool sizes of mineralizable C (C0), the calculated C mineralization rates (k) did not vary within management systems (P > 0.30), which may be due to differences in biological activity, soil organic matter availability, and/or stage of humification.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 Pool of mineralizable C (C0), mineralization rate (k), and half-life time (t1/2) of soil organic matter associated with macroaggregates from two management systems
|
|
The effect of freezethaw on denitrification activity varied with aggregate size fractions, which showed a 40% higher denitrification rate within small than within large macroaggregates. We also measured a water content 40% higher in small macroaggregates compared with large macroaggregates. Because the wet-sieving method used to separate macroaggregate fractions may interfere with C0 distribution by removing a part of the labile organic C and by modifying water content (Christensen and Christensen, 1991), wet sieving may influence the denitrification rates following freezethaw of macroaggregate fractions. This possibility is corroborated by Satricka and Benoit (1995), who observed that surface resistance of soil aggregates to breakdown by freezing impact declines as aggregate size and soil water content increases. However, Seech and Beauchamp (1988), using a dry sieving method to separate aggregates, found that denitrification potential was related to mineralizable C and was greater in small (<0.25 and 0.250.5 mm) than in large aggregates. This suggests that our results obtained using the wet-sieving method using a prewetting procedure are in concordance with results obtained by dry-sieving. Although denitrification rates can be reduced by using wet sieving, two-thirds of the difference between the fractions persisted after washing, suggesting that differences of denitrification activity in aggregates of various sizes were primarily related to intrinsic sample properties (Christensen and Christensen, 1991).
Effects of FreezingThawing on Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Soil Cores
Under aerobic conditions, agricultural practices and freezingthawing cycle showed a significant effect on N2O emission from soil sampled in November but not from that sampled in October (Table 2 , Fig. 3a)
. In undisturbed soils obtained in November, as observed in slurries, the NTR treatment exhibited N2O production significantly higher (
500%) than those from CTC, indicating that environmental factors conducive to denitrification were more likely present in the late autumn (November). Among the critical environmental factors, volumetric soil water content, which regulates O2 availability to denitrifiers, averaged 39% in soil cores sampled in November and 28% in those sampled in October. In November, N2O emission also increased (
220%) similarly in both agricultural practices after a freezingthawing cycle. This is in agreement with other studies showing that the thawing of a soil can cause temporal increase in N2O production by denitrification (Christensen and Tiedje, 1990). Measurements of N2O made under aerobic (ambient air) conditions represented the net emission of N2O evolved from soils, whereas measurements in anaerobic conditions and in the presence of acetylene represented the potential of N2O plus N2 production by denitrification.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 Nonparametric multiple comparison test on ranks of N2O and CO2 emissions vs. freezingthawing cycle and agricultural practices from data obtained from undisturbed soil cores
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3 Effect of freezingthawing cycle and agricultural practices on N2O and CO2 emissions in undisturbed soil cores under aerobic (ambient air) and anaerobic (N2 + 10% C2H2, v/v) incubations
|
|
Furthermore, under anaerobic conditions, N2O production in soil cores collected in October showed the tendency (results not significant) to produce more (
138%) N2O in NTR than in CTC soils (Fig. 3a). It is known that O2 is the dominant factor limiting denitrification in agricultural soils, but C availability could also limit denitrification when anaerobic zones are present (Firestone and Davidson, 1989).
Production of CO2 from soil cores was significantly affected by agricultural practices and by freezingthawing cycle, except for the aerobic incubation in October (Table 2, Fig. 3b). Despite the lack of effects of agricultural practices on N2O and CO2 emissions in October, the pattern of Fig. 3b suggests that differences in available C occurred in October. In general, CO2 production, which is due to microbial respiration, followed the same trend as N2O production (Fig. 3a). Both gases were higher in NTR than in CTC soils, probably reflecting the higher mineralizable C (not shown) that can support denitrification. There was also a burst of CO2 production following thawing, which supports the increase in microbial activity, such as denitrification.
 |
Conclusions
|
|---|
Soils under no-tillagebarleyclover rotation practice (NTR) showed higher capacities to denitrify than those from conventional tillcontinuous culture (CTC). These soil properties (e.g., available C and sufficiently depleted O2) were reflected in the levels of N2O produced from undisturbed soils when conditions for denitrification were not limiting. This study also showed that a freezingthawing cycle increases denitrification activity, which may result in higher net N2O emissions from soils.
Our results showed that a single short freezing and thawing cycle caused a burst of denitrification in macroaggregates. This burst was sustained by C mineralization from organic matter released by disruptive forces induced by freezing, and it was higher in small than in large macroaggregates. The greater effect of freezing on small aggregates was probably due to their higher water content. The no-tillage and rotation system (NTR) resulted in a greater pool of mineralizable C in macroaggregates, and stimulated denitrification rates in the topsoil compared with a conventional tillage with continuous barley system (CTC).
The effects of freezing and thawing cycles should be included in simulation models of N2O emissions for climatic zones where freezing of the topsoil is a frequent event. Understanding of exact mechanisms and quantification of the fundamental relationships between microstructure with denitrification activity and organic matter availability will improve the accuracy of model outputs.SAS Institute 1988
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
This study was supported by the GHG Initiative of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. We wish to thank Dr. D.A. Angers and Dr. C. Chenu for their valuable comments at the beginning of this study, as well as G. Lévesque and Dr. H. Benmoussa for their work in the laboratory. The technical assistance of Brigitte Patry is also gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. D.A. Angers and Dr. B.H. Ellert for valuable comments on earlier version of this manuscript.
Received for publication October 26, 1999.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Angers D.A., Bissonnette N., Legere A., Samson N. Microbial and biochemical changes induced by rotation and tillage in a soil under barley production. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1993;73:39-50 a.
- Angers D.A., Carter M.R. Aggregation and organic matter storage in cool, humid agricultural soils. In: Carter M.R., Stewart B.A., eds. Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils. Boca Raton, FL: Adv. Soil Sci. CRC Press, 1996:193-211.
- Angers D.A., Samson N., Legere A. Early changes in water-stable aggregation induced by rotation and tillage in a soil under barley production. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1993;73:51-59 b.
- Beare M.H., Cabrera M.L., Hendrix P.F., Coleman D.C. Aggregate-protected and unprotected organic matter pools in conventional- and no-tillage soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1994;58:787-795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bijay-Singh, Ryden J.C., Whitehead D.C. Some relationships between denitrification potential and fractions of organic carbon in air-dried and field-moist soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1988;20:737-741.
- Bourget S.J., Kemp J.G. Wet sieving apparatus for stability analysis of soil aggregates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1957;37:60.
- Bremner J.M., Robbins S.G., Blackmer A.M. Seasonal variability in emission of nitrous oxide from soil. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1980;7:641-644.
- Bullock M.S., Kemper W.D., Nelson S.D. Soil cohesion as affected by freezing, water content, time and tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1988;52:770-776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cambardella C.A., Elliott E.T. Methods for physical separation and characterization of soil organic matter fractions. Geoderma 1993;56:449-457.
- Christensen S., Christensen B.T. Organic matter available for denitrification in different soil fractions: Effect of freeze/thaw cycles and straw disposal. J. Soil Sci. 1991;42:637-647.
- Christensen S., Tiedje J.M. Brief and vigorous N2O production by soil at spring thaw. J. Soil Sci. 1990;4:1-4.
- Conover W.J. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980.
- Duxbury J.M., Harper L.A., Mosier A.R. Contributions of agroecosystems to global climate change. In: Rolston D.E., et al. , ed. Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global climate change. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, and ASA, 1993:1-18 ASA Spec. Publ. 55..
- Elliott E.T. Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986;50:627-633.
- Firestone M.K., Davidson E.A. Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soils. In: Andreae M.O., Chimel D.S., eds. Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. New York: John Wiley, 1989:7-21.
- Germon J.C. Étude quantitative de la dénitrification biologique dans le sol à l'aide de l'acétylène: I. Application à différents sols. Ann. Microbiol. 1980;131:69-80.
- Le Bissonnais Y. Analyse des processus de microfissuration des agrégats à l'humectation. Bull. Ass. Fr. Etude Sol, Sci. Sol 1989;27:187-199.
- Martin K., Parsons L.L., Murray R.E., Smith M.S. Dynamics of soil denitrifier populations: Relationships between enzyme activity, most-probable-number counts, and actual N gas loss. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988;54:2711-2716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1984.
- Mosier A.R., Duxbury J.M., Freeney J.R., Heinemeyer O., Minami K. Nitrous oxide from agricultural fields: Assessment, measurement and mitigation. Plant Soil 1996;181:95-108.
- Myrold D.D., Tiedje J.M. Establishment of denitrification capacity in soil: Effects of carbon, nitrate and moisture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1985;17:819-822.
- Nyborg M., Laidlaw J.W., Solberg E.D., Malhi S.S. Denitrification and nitrous oxide emissions from a Black Chernozemic soil during spring thaw in Alberta. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1997;77:153-160.
- Odell R.T., Melsted S.W., Walter W.M. Changes in organic C and N of morrow plot soils under different treatments: 19041973. Soil Sci. 1984;137:160-171.
- Pagliai M., De Nobili M. Relationships between soil porosity, root development and soil enzyme activity in cultivated soils. Geoderma 1993;56:243-256.
- Pelletier F., Prévost D., Laliberté G., van Bochove E. Seasonal response of denitrifiers to temperature in a Québec cropped soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1999;79:551-556.
- Puget P., Chenu C., Balesdent J. Total and young organic matter distributions in aggregates of silty cultivated soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1995;46:449-459.
- Rice C.W., Smith M.S. Denitrification in no-till and plowed soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1982;46:1168-1173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Röver M., Heinemeyer O., Kaiser E.-A. Microbial induced nitrous oxide emissions from an arable soil during winter. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1998;14:1859-1865.
- SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 6.03 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Inst, 1988.
- Satricka J.A., Benoit G.R. Freeze-drying effects on wet and dry soil aggregate stability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1995;59:218-223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Seech A.G., Beauchamp E.G. Denitrification in soil aggregates of different sizes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1988;52:1616-1621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sexstone A.J., Parkin T.P., Tiedje J.M. Temporal response of soil denitrification to rainfall and irrigation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985;49:99-103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sheaffer C.C., Barnes D.K. Forage crops. In: Christie B.R., ed. Handbook of plant science in agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1987:217-249.
- Soulides D.A., Allison F.E. Effects of drying and freezing soil on carbon dioxide production, available mineral nutrients, aggregation and bacterial population. Soil Sci. 1961;91:291-298.
- Tisdall J.M., Oades J.M. The management of ryegrass to stabilize aggregates of a red-brown earth. Aust. J. Soil Res. 1980;18:415-422.
- van Bochove E., Jones H.G., Pelletier F., Prévost D. Emissions of N2O from agricultural soil under snow cover: A significant part of N budget. Hydrol. Processes 1996;10:1545-1549.
- van Bochove E., Jones H.G., Bertrand N., Prévost D. Winter fluxes of greenhouse gases from snow covered agricultural soil: Intra- and interannual variations. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycl. 2000;14:113-125.
- Wagner-Riddle C., Thurtell G.W. Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields during winter and spring thaw as affected by management practices. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1998;52:151-163.
- Watson R.T., Meira Filho L.C., Sanhueza E., Janetos A. Sources and sinks. In: Houghton J.T., et al. , ed. Climate change. The supplementary report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992:25-46.
- Zibilske, L.M. 1994. Carbon mineralization. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. C. Hu, E. van Bochove, J. Warland, B. Kay, and C. Wagner-Riddle
New Method to Simulate Soil Freezing and Thawing Cycles for Studying Nitrous Oxide Flux
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
October 27, 2006;
70(6):
2106 - 2113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Yates, B. C. Si, R. E. Farrell, and D. J. Pennock
Probability Distribution and Spatial Dependence of Nitrous Oxide Emission: Temporal Change in Hummocky Terrain
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
March 29, 2006;
70(3):
753 - 762.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|