SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (116)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Combrink, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Combrink, C.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Combrink, C.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:681-689 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-6-SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Soil Structure and Organic Matter

I. Distribution of Aggregate-Size Classes and Aggregate-Associated Carbon

J. Six, K. Paustian, E.T. Elliott and C. Combrink

Natural Resource Ecology Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA

johan{at}nrel.colostate.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Cultivation reduces soil C content and changes the distribution and stability of soil aggregates. We investigated the effect of cultivation intensity on aggregate distribution and aggregate C in three soils dominated by 2:1 clay mineralogy and one soil characterized by a mixed (2:1 and 1:1) mineralogy. Each site had native vegetation (NV), no-tillage (NT), and conventional tillage (CT) treatments. Slaked (i.e., air-dried and fast-rewetted) and capillary rewetted soils were separated into four aggregate-size classes (<53, 53–250, 250–2000, and >2000 µm) by wet sieving. In rewetted soils, the proportion of macroaggregates accounted for 85% of the dry soil weight and was similar across management treatments. In contrast, aggregate distribution from slaked soils increasingly shifted toward more microaggregates and fewer macroaggregates with increasing cultivation intensity. In soils dominated by 2:1 clay mineralogy, the C content of macroaggregates was 1.65 times greater compared to microaggregates. These observations support an aggregate hierarchy in which microaggregates are bound together into macroaggregates by organic binding agents in 2:1 clay-dominated soils. In the soil with mixed mineralogy, aggregate C did not increase with increasing aggregate size. At all sites, rewetted macro- and microaggregate C and slaked microaggregate C differed in the order NV > NT > CT. In contrast, slaked macroaggregate C concentration was similar across management treatments, except in the soil with mixed clay mineralogy. We conclude that increasing cultivation intensity leads to a loss of C-rich macroaggregates and an increase of C-depleted microaggregates in soils that express aggregate hierarchy.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • IPOM, intra-aggregate particulate organic matter • LF, light fraction • NV, native vegetation • NT, no-tillage • POM, particulate organic matter • SOM, soil organic matter


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
TISDALL AND OADES (1982) presented a conceptual model for aggregate hierarchy that described how primary mineral particles are bound together with bacterial, fungal, and plant debris into microaggregates. These microaggregates, in turn, are bound together into macroaggregates by transient binding agents (i.e., microbial- and plant-derived polysaccharides) and temporary binding agents (roots and fungal hyphae). Three consequences of this aggregate hierarchy are: (i) a gradual breakdown of macroaggregates into microaggregates before they dissociate into primary particles, as increasing dispersive energy is applied to soil (Oades and Waters, 1991), (ii) an increase in C concentration with increasing aggregate-size class because large aggregate-size classes are composed of small aggregate-size classes plus organic binding agents (Elliott, 1986), and (iii) younger and more labile organic matter is contained in macroaggregates than in microaggregates (Elliott, 1986; Puget et al., 1995; Jastrow et al., 1996).

Oades and Waters (1991) tested the aggregate hierarchy theory in different soils by applying a range of treatments to disaggregate soils. They concluded that aggregate hierarchy existed in two Alfisols and a Mollisol because organic materials were the major binding agents for aggregate formation and stabilization in these soils. In contrast, they found that an Oxisol did not express any hierarchical aggregate structure, probably because oxides, rather than organic materials, were the dominant stabilizing agents. Elliott (1986) observed more organic matter associated with macroaggregates than with microaggregates in a temperate grassland soil. He also found that organic matter associated with macroaggregates was more labile than organic matter associated with microaggregates. Jastrow et al. (1996) reported greater amounts of recently incorporated organic matter as aggregates became larger, supporting the idea that microaggregates are bound together by young organic matter into larger macroaggregates.

Aggregate hierarchy theory has been used by many authors to explain the correlation between a reduction in aggregation and loss of soil organic matter (SOM) with cultivation (Elliott, 1986; Cambardella and Elliott, 1993; Beare et al., 1994). A breakdown of macroaggregates results in a release of labile SOM (Elliott, 1986) and its increased availability for microbial decomposition. The increased microbial activity depletes SOM, which eventually leads to lower microbial biomass and activity and consequently a lower production of microbial-derived binding agents and a loss of aggregation (Jastrow, 1996; Six et al., 1998).

Reduced aggregation (and subsequent lower levels of SOM) in conventional tillage (CT) vs. no-tillage (NT) (Paustian et al., 1999) is a result of several indirect effects on aggregation. Tillage brings subsurface soil to the surface where it is then exposed to wet–dry and freeze–thaw cycles and subjected to raindrop impact (Beare et al., 1994; Paustian et al., 1997), thereby increasing the susceptibility of aggregates to disruption (Willis, 1955; Hadas, 1990; Edwards, 1991). Plowing changes the soil conditions (e.g., temperature, moisture, and aeration) and increases the decomposition rates of litter (Rovira and Greacen, 1957; Cambardella and Elliott, 1993). In NT, residues accumulate at the surface where the litter decomposition rate is slowed due to drier conditions and reduced contact between soil microorganisms and litter (Salinas-Garcia et al., 1997). Finally, the proportion of the microbial biomass composed of total fungi (Frey et al., 1999) and mycorrhizal fungi (O'Halloran et al., 1986) is generally higher in NT compared to CT and it has been observed that fungi (especially mycorrhizal) contribute to macroaggregate formation and stabilization (Tisdall and Oades, 1982).

The objectives of this study were to (i) test the validity of the aggregate hierarchy theory over a range of soils and (ii) study the affect of increased cultivation intensity on aggregation and aggregate-associated C.


    Materials and methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Sampling
Soils from four long-term agricultural field experiments (Table 1) were sampled at two depths (0–5 cm and 5–20 cm) in November 1995. The four sites are located in Sidney, NE (41°14'N, 103°00'W), Wooster, OH (40°48'N, 82°00'W), W. K. Kellogg Biological Station (KBS), MI (42°24'N, 85°24'W), and Lexington, KY (38°07'N, 84°29'W). All four sites have NV, NT, and CT treatments with either three or four replicates. At Sidney, all management treatments were established directly from the native shortgrass prairie. At KBS, NT and CT plots were under long-term cultivation before establishment, whereas the adjacent NV plot was in grass vegetation on a former woodlot that had never been cultivated. At Wooster, the NV plot was in nearby forest, but the NT and CT plots were established in a 6-yr-old grass meadow that was cultivated for many years prior to establishment. At Lexington, the experimental plots were initially under long-term cultivation, but for 50 yr prior to treatment establishment were in bluegrass pasture. The Lexington soil is characterized by a mixed-clay mineralogy dominated by kaolinite (1:1 layer type) and vermiculite (2:1 layer type). In addition, a 2 to 16 times higher concentration of amorphous and poorly crystalline Fe- and Al-oxides was reported for the Lexington soil compared to the Sidney, Wooster, and KBS soils (Six et al., 1999b). The Sidney, KBS, and Wooster soils have only 2:1 minerals, predominantly illite and chlorite (Six et al., 1999b).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 General characteristics of the agricultural experiment field sites

 
Aggregate Separation
Field-moist soil was gently broken to pass an 8-mm sieve and air-dried. Aggregate separations and soil stability assessments were done by wet sieving. Two pretreatments were applied before wet sieving: (i) air-dried soil was rapidly immersed in water (slaked treatment) and (ii) air-dried soil was capillary-rewetted before immersion in water (rewetted treatment). For capillary rewetting, dried soil was placed on filter paper that was slowly moistened until a water content of 1.05 times field capacity was reached. The volumetric water content of the soil at field capacity was determined for all individual samples. A higher amount of disruptive energy occurs upon slaking because rapid wetting of dry soil leads to an entrapment of air and a buildup of air pressure within the aggregates (Kemper et al., 1985). Aggregates of lower stability disrupt because they cannot withstand this pressure. In contrast, soil rewetted to 1.05 times field capacity is at maximum stability (Hofman and De Leenheer, 1975).

The method used for aggregate-size separation was adapted from Elliott (1986). Briefly a 100-g subsample (air-dried or capillary-rewetted) was submerged for 5 min on a 2000-µm sieve. Aggregates were separated by moving the sieve (by hand) up and down 3 cm with 50 repetitions during 2 min. The >2000-µm aggregates were collected and sieving was repeated for the <2000-µm fraction with the next smaller-sized sieve. This procedure was repeated for every sieve size (250 and 53 µm). All aggregate fractions were oven-dried (50°C) and weighed. Sand content (>53 µm) of the aggregates was determined on a subsample of aggregates that were dispersed with sodium hexametaphosphate (5 g L-1).

Free Light Fraction and Mineral-Associated Fraction Analysis
The free light fraction (POM outside of the aggregates, or free LF) and mineral-associated organic matter fraction were isolated from the three largest aggregate-size classes according to Six et al. (1998). Briefly, free LF was isolated by density flotation in 1.85 g cm-3 sodium polytungstate. The free LF probably includes both LF outside of aggregates and some LF released from the aggregates upon submersion in sodium polytungstate. However, the dispersion of aggregates in sodium polytungstate is minimal and therefore the released fraction was only a small proportion of the free LF. Sodium polytungstate was recycled according to Six et al. (1999c) to avoid cross- contamination of C and N between samples. After isolation of free LF, aggregates were dispersed in 5 g L-1 sodium hexametaphosphate by shaking for 18 h on a reciprocal shaker. Intra-aggregate (within aggregate) particulate organic matter (IPOM) was isolated by sieving. Aggregate-associated C and mineral-associated C were calculated by difference

(1)

(2)
where total aggregate C is total C measured in aggregates prior to free LF flotation. Aggregate-associated C and mineral-associated C were only determined for the slaked microaggregates (53–250 µm) and small macroaggregates (250–2000 µm). The yield of large macroaggregates (>2000 µm) after slaking was often too small to be analyzed. For the <53-µm fraction, the LF yield was too small for C analysis and by definition (Cambardella and Elliott, 1992) there is no IPOM in particles <53 µm.

Carbon, Nitrogen, and Isotope Analyses
Isotope and organic C and N analyses were performed according to Six et al. (1998). The natural abundance 13C methodology for SOM studies was only done at the Sidney site. The other locations did not have a single shift in the dominance of plant species with different metabolic pathways (C3 vs. C4) or archived soil samples from the beginning of the experiment. At Sidney, the delta 13C values ({delta}) were used to calculate the proportion of wheat-derived C (f) in each organic matter fraction:

(3)
where {delta}t = {delta}13C at time t, {delta}w = {delta}13C of wheat straw (crop), {delta}0 = {delta}13C of original grassland-derived SOM, and f = fraction of wheat-derived C in the soil. The proportions of wheat-derived C vs. grassland-derived C (1 - f) provide a measure of the relative age of the organic matter in the different size fractions. The proportions of crop-derived C are only presented for the 0- to 5-cm layer because changes in the 13C signature with depth confound interpretations at the 5- to 20-cm depth. In addition, differences in C concentrations were mainly observed in the 0- to 5-cm layer.

Statistical Analyses
The experimental field design was a randomized complete block design for all sites. However, the NV were not replicated within the experiments at Wooster, KBS, and Lexington and therefore not included in the statistical analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA-GLM, SAS Institute, 1990) was performed with multiple comparisons within a depth. Tillage treatment was the main factor in the model, with aggregate size and replicate as secondary factors. Separation of means was tested using Tukey's honestly significant difference at a level of P < 0.05.


    Results
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Whole Soil Characteristics
Total organic C and N (0–20 cm) generally decreased (but not always significantly) in the order NV > NT > CT (Table 2) . At all sites, significant differences in total organic C and N between treatments were observed in the 0- to 5-cm depth, except at KBS where NT and CT were not significantly different. Organic C and N levels were on average 38% lower in CT compared to NT in the 0- to 5-cm depth (Table 2). In contrast, there were no significant differences observed in total C and N in the 5- to 20-cm depth at any site. Bulk density was not significantly affected by tillage at any of the sites (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Organic carbon, nitrogen, and bulk density in four agricultural experiment sites with native vegetation (NV), no-tillage (NT), and conventional tillage (CT) treatments

 
Aggregate-Size Distribution
At all sites, rewetted aggregate-size distributions were dominated by macroaggregates (250–2000 µm and >2000 µm), which on average accounted for 85% of the dry soil weight (Fig. 1) . A nonsignificant higher proportion of large macroaggregates was found in NT compared to NV and CT, especially at Sidney and KBS. Otherwise, there were no major differences among treatments in the rewetted aggregate distribution. In contrast, the slaked aggregate-size distribution differed between management treatments at all sites (Fig. 1). Proportions of macroaggregates decreased in the order NV > NT > CT, except that NV and NT were similar at Wooster. The lack of differences in aggregation between NV and NT at Wooster (Fig. 1) was consistent with their similar values for total C (Table 1) and total POM (Six et al., 1999a). At all sites, there was a reduction in large macroaggregates and an increase in microaggregates with slaking compared to rewetting. The proportion of silt and clay particles (<53 µm) increased from {approx}0.05 in rewetted samples to 0.15 in slaked samples and this increase was greatest in the Lexington soil (Fig. 1).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Slaked and rewetted aggregate-size distributions in the surface layer (0–5 cm) of four long-term agricultural experiment sites (SID = Sidney, NE; WO = Wooster, OH; KBS = Kellogg Biological Station, MI; LX = Lexington, KY) with three management treatments (NV = native vegetation; NT = no-tillage; CT = conventional tillage). Bars are standard deviations

 
At Sidney and Wooster, tilled soils showed a substantial decrease in small and large macroaggregates concomitant with an increase in microaggregates and a small increase of silt and clay particles, compared with NT (Fig. 1). The small difference in slaked aggregate distribution between NT and CT at KBS may be due to the short duration (9 yr) of the experiment at KBS. At Lexington, CT had fewer large macroaggregates (1.4% vs. 18.0%), more microaggregates (37.3% vs. 16.8%), and more silt and clay particles (15.5% vs. 9.3%) than in NT, but there was no difference in the proportion of small macroaggregates between tillage treatments.

Aggregate Carbon Concentrations
It is frequently observed that the major differences in organic matter content between NT and CT soils are in the upper few centimeters of soil (Doran, 1987; Dick et al., 1997). Similarly, we found few differences in aggregate C among treatments at the 5- to 20-cm depth (data not shown). The only exception was KBS, where the NV treatment had substantially higher aggregate C concentrations at 5 to 20 cm compared to NT and CT (data not shown). This trend may be due to the long-term cultivation of NT and CT plots before establishment of the experiment. While not reported, trends across aggregate-size classes within treatments were the same in the subsurface layer and surface layer. Therefore, further comparisons are made only for the 0- to 5-cm layer.

In general, sand-free C concentrations of all rewetted aggregate-size classes differed in the order NV > NT > CT (Fig. 2) . At KBS, NT and CT did not differ significantly in this respect, which may again be a result of the young age of the experiment. The apparent large differences between rewetted (and slaked) aggregate C concentrations in NV versus NT and CT at KBS is probably also a result of the long-term cultivation of the NT and CT plots prior to establishment of the experiment. In contrast to the other sites, rewetted aggregate C concentrations at Wooster (the only site with forest vegetation) were not different between NV and NT, except for the microaggregates. This suggests that forest vegetation is not as beneficial as grassland vegetation for the accumulation of aggregate C.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Slaked and rewetted aggregate C concentrations in the surface layer (0–5 cm) of four long-term agricultural experiment sites (SID = Sidney, NE; WO = Wooster, OH; KBS = Kellogg Biological Station, MI; LX = Lexington, KY) with three management treatments (NV = native vegetation; NT = no-tillage; CT = conventional tillage). All C concentrations are corrected for sand content. Bars are standard deviations

 
At Sidney, Wooster, and KBS (sites with 2:1 clay-dominated soils), slaked aggregate C content increased with increasing aggregate size within a management treatment (except NV at KBS), although the C content of large macroaggregates was similar to that of small macroaggregates (Fig. 2). The C content of small macroaggregates was on average 1.65 times greater compared to microaggregates. This trend of greater C content in small macroaggregates compared to microaggregates is also apparent in the aggregate-associated C and mineral-associated C of NT and CT (Table 3) . Aggregate-associated C and mineral-associated C concentrations were more similar across tillage treatments for slaked macroaggregates compared to slaked microaggregates, in these 2:1 clay-dominated soils (Table 3). The C concentrations of slaked microaggregates differed in the order NV > NT > CT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Aggregate-associated C and mineral-associated C concentrations for slaked microaggregates and small macroaggregates in four agricultural experiment sites with native vegetation (NV), no-tillage (NT), and conventional tillage (CT) treatments (0–5 cm depth)

 
At Sidney, both grassland- and especially crop-derived aggregate C increased with increasing aggregate size, except for the largest size which had equal or lower concentrations than the next-smaller size (Table 4) . In addition, the percentage of crop-derived C increased about 32% and 38% with increasing aggregate size in NT and CT, respectively (Table 4). This observation is in agreement with Puget et al. (1995) and Jastrow et al. (1996) who also observed increasing proportions of "young" C with increasing aggregate size.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Grassland-derived aggregate C concentrations and crop-derived aggregate C proportions and concentrations in Sidney, NE, as determined by 13C natural abundance analysis (0–5 cm; slaked)

 
In contrast to the 2:1 clay-dominated soils, aggregate C (Fig. 2), aggregate-associated C, and mineral-associated C (Table 3) concentrations for slaked aggregates did not differ between macro- and microaggregates within a management treatment in the Lexington soil (mixed-clay mineralogy). Feller et al. (1996) also observed similar C concentrations in different aggregate-size classes in a low-activity (1:1 clay) soil. Elliott et al. (1991) also found no significant differences in aggregate C concentrations among aggregate-size classes in a Ultisol from the Amazon Basin of Peru.


    Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
In soils where SOM is the major binding agent an aggregate hierarchy has been observed (Tisdall and Oades, 1982; Oades and Waters, 1991). SOM is expected to be the primary binding agent in 2:1 clay-dominated soils because polyvalent-organic matter complexes form bridges between the negatively charged clay platelets. In contrast, SOM is not the only binding agent in oxide- and 1:1 clay-dominated soils. Electrostatic attractions occur between and among oxides and kaolinite platelets due to simultaneous existence of positive and negative charges at field pH (Schofield and Samson, 1954; El-Swaify, 1980). Thus in those soils aggregate formation is partly induced by electrostatic interactions and aggregate hierarchy should be less pronounced (Oades and Waters, 1991).

The increased aggregate- and mineral-associated C content of small macroaggregates vs. microaggregates (within treatment) at Sidney, Wooster, and KBS (Table 3) indicates that both IPOM C and mineral-associated C are incorporated during formation of macroaggregates. This also suggests that IPOM C is a major C source for microbial activity and thereby induces the binding of clay- and silt-sized particles and microaggregates into macroaggregates (Jastrow, 1996; Six et al., 1998, 1999a) in these 2:1 clay-dominated soils. In addition, the similarity of aggregate-associated C concentrations of slaked macroaggregates across management treatments indicates the stability of slaked macroaggregates is correlated to their C content (Elliott, 1986; Cambardella and Elliott, 1993). The stability of microaggregates, in contrast, does not seem to be correlated to C content, because there is a difference in slaked microaggregate C content among treatments at all sites (Table 3). Perhaps the physical characteristics of microaggregates such as lower porosity and higher bulk density (Oades and Waters, 1991) are the main factors that confer resistance to slaking rather than their C content.

The comparison of rewetted and slaked aggregate distribution and the aggregate-associated C concentrations provides information on the degree of aggregate hierarchy exhibited by the different soils. The aggregate hierarchy theory seems applicable to the 2:1 clay-dominated soils at Sidney, Wooster, and KBS because of (i) small increases in silt and clay particles, but large increases in microaggregates, upon disruption of the macroaggregate (Fig. 1) (Elliott, 1986; Oades and Waters, 1991), (ii) small differences in silt and clay proportion between NT and CT (Fig. 1) (Elliott, 1986), and (iii) increased aggregate-associated C concentrations with increasing aggregate sizes in slaked soils (Table 3) (Elliott, 1986). Additional support for the aggregate hierarchy at Sidney is provided by the 13C natural abundance data (Table 4). The increase in proportions of young C with aggregate size indicates that microaggregates are bound together into larger macroaggregates by crop-derived C (Puget et al., 1995; Jastrow et al., 1996).

Elliott (1986) used the aggregate hierarchy theory as a basis to explain reduced SOM level in a stubble mulch agroecosystem compared to native sod. We apply this theory to explain the decreasing SOM content in the order NV > NT > CT at Sidney, Wooster, and KBS (soils that express aggregate hierarchy). However, NV at KBS had much higher slaked aggregate C contents than NT and CT, probably a result of the difference in history of the NV vs. the NT and CT plots; therefore the NV treatment is ignored in the discussion below.

Increasing cultivation intensity led to a loss of C-rich macroaggregates and an increase of C-depleted microaggregates. There were no consistent significant differences in the proportions of rewetted macroaggregates (>250-µm fractions) among management treatments (Fig. 1), but the rewetted large and small macroaggregate C concentrations differed in the order NV > NT > CT (Fig. 2). In contrast, the proportions of slaked macroaggregates differed in the order NV > NT > CT (Fig. 1), but the slaked macroaggregate C concentrations were similar across management treatments (Fig. 2 and Table 3). These observations suggest that the C lost with increasing cultivation intensity is responsible for the higher proportions of stable macroaggregates (i.e., slaked macroaggregates) in the order NV > NT > CT; it is the C of binding agents that binds individual microaggregates into stable macroaggregates (Tisdall and Oades, 1982; Elliott, 1986). In our study, increasing cultivation intensity increased the proportion of slaked microaggregates, which were depleted in C compared to macroaggregates and increasingly depleted in C with increasing cultivation intensity (Fig. 2). Therefore we conclude that increasing cultivation intensity leads to a loss of C-rich macroaggregates and an increase of C-depleted microaggregates in soils that express aggregate hierarchy. This shift results in a loss of total organic C. The C lost was that which binds microaggregates into macroaggregates. These observations made at Sidney, Wooster, and KBS extend Elliott's results from stubble mulch agroecosystems to NT and CT agroecosystems characterized by 2:1 clay-dominated soils.

The aggregate hierarchy theory seems to be less applicable to the Lexington soil (mixed mineralogy) because within management treatments (i) similar total aggregate C, aggregate-associated C, and mineral-associated C concentrations were observed across aggregate-size classes (Table 3), (ii) the proportion of silt- and clay-sized particles increased the most from the rewetted to slaked aggregate distribution at Lexington (Fig. 1), and (iii) large macroaggregates broke up into silt and clay particles and microaggregates with increasing cultivation intensity, whereas the proportion of small macroaggregates was about the same.

Beare et al. (1994) also observed only small differences in aggregate distribution between NT and CT in a kaolinitic soil in Georgia. The largest difference between NT and CT was in the proportions of large macroaggregates, which primarily fell apart into silt- and clay-sized particles. The proportions of small macroaggregates were similar across tillage regimes (Beare et al., 1994). As previously mentioned, Feller et al. (1996) and Elliott et al. (1991) did not observe increased C concentrations with increasing aggregate size in 1:1 clay-dominated soils. The less-pronounced aggregate hierarchy in the Lexington soil is probably a result of the presence of Fe- and Al-oxides and kaolinite (1:1 clay) which contribute to soil stability through electrostatic interactions (Oades and Waters, 1991). We conclude that the Lexington soil does not express as much aggregate hierarchy as the 2:1 clay-dominated soils because of the presence of oxides and 1:1 clays.

In capillary-wetted aggregates from a kaolinitic soil, Beare et al. (1994) observed a higher C content in microaggregates than in macroaggregates. We observed the same trend of increasing C content from large macroaggregates to microaggregates in rewetted soils at Lexington. However, at the other sites no significant differences in C content between macroaggregates and microaggregates in rewetted soils within a management treatment were observed. Other authors also found no differences in misted or rewetted aggregate C contents within a treatment (Elliott, 1986; Cambardella and Elliott, 1993). The higher C content observed in nonslaked microaggregates may therefore be specific for soils with 1:1 clay minerals.


    Conclusions
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Aggregate hierarchy was observed in soils from Sidney, KBS, and Wooster, all dominated by 2:1 clay mineralogies. The Lexington soil expressed less aggregate hierarchy, which may be due to the presence of oxides and low-activity clays (kaolinite). There was a clear relationship between loss of soil structure and loss of SOM in the soils that expressed aggregate hierarchy. Increasing cultivation intensity induced a loss of C-rich macroaggregates and a gain of C-depleted microaggregates, resulting in an overall loss of SOM C.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Thanks are extended to Scott Pavey and Matt Nemeth for their many hours of sieving, weighing, and C and N analysis. Dan Reuss's help during the laboratory work is greatly appreciated. We acknowledge the assistance of Drew Lyon (Univ. of Nebraska, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff) at the Sidney site, Edmund Perfect and Robert Blevins (Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington) at the Lexington site, H.P. Collins and G.P. Robertson (Univ. of Michigan, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Hickory Corners) at the Kellogg site, and W.A. Dick (Ohio State Univ., Wooster) at the Wooster site. Comments on the manuscript by three anonymous reviewers and the associate editor are acknowledged. This research was supported by grant DEB-9419854 from the National Science Foundation.

Received for publication December 21, 1998.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Bosshard, E. Frossard, D. Dubois, P. Mader, I. Manolov, and A. Oberson
Incorporation of Nitrogen-15-Labeled Amendments into Physically Separated Soil Organic Matter Fractions
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 29, 2008; 72(4): 949 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Paul, G. O. Martinson, E. Veldkamp, and H. Flessa
Sample Pretreatment Affects the Distribution of Organic Carbon in Aggregates of Tropical Grassland Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 15, 2008; 72(2): 500 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. P. Olchin, S. Ogle, S. D. Frey, T. R. Filley, K. Paustian, and J. Six
Residue Carbon Stabilization in Soil Aggregates of No-Till and Tillage Management of Dryland Cropping Systems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 15, 2008; 72(2): 507 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Zhuang, J. F. McCarthy, E. Perfect, L. M. Mayer, and J. D. Jastrow
Soil Water Hysteresis in Water-Stable Microaggregates as Affected by Organic Matter
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 212 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. J.M. Smucker, E.-J. Park, J. Dorner, and R. Horn
Soil Micropore Development and Contributions to Soluble Carbon Transport within Macroaggregates
Vadose Zone J., May 17, 2007; 6(2): 282 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
V. Yadav and G. Malanson
Progress in soil organic matter research: litter decomposition, modelling, monitoring and sequestration
Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 131 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
X. Hao and A. N. Kravchenko
Management Practice Effects on Surface Soil Total Carbon: Differences along a Textural Gradient
Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 18 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D. A. N. Ussiri, R. Lal, and P. A. Jacinthe
Soil Properties and Carbon Sequestration of Afforested Pastures in Reclaimed Minesoils of Ohio
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 22, 2006; 70(5): 1797 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. S. Grandy, T. D. Loecke, S. Parr, and G. P. Robertson
Long-term trends in nitrous oxide emissions, soil nitrogen, and crop yields of till and no-till cropping systems.
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1487 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. S. Grandy and G. P. Robertson
Aggregation and Organic Matter Protection Following Tillage of a Previously Uncultivated Soil
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1398 - 1406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Six, S. D. Frey, R. K. Thiet, and K. M. Batten
Bacterial and Fungal Contributions to Carbon Sequestration in Agroecosystems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 555 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. C. Manna, A. Swarup, R. H. Wanjari, Y. V. Singh, P. K. Ghosh, K. N. Singh, A. K. Tripathi, and M. N. Saha
Soil Organic Matter in a West Bengal Inceptisol after 30 Years of Multiple Cropping and Fertilization
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., December 2, 2005; 70(1): 121 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Zotarelli, B. J. R. Alves, S. Urquiaga, E. Torres, H. P. dos Santos, K. Paustian, R. M. Boddey, and J. Six
Impact of Tillage and Crop Rotation on Aggregate-Associated Carbon in Two Oxisols
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2005; 69(2): 482 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. L. Wright and F. M. Hons
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Storage in Aggregates from Different Tillage and Crop Regimes
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Mikutta, F. Lang, and M. Kaupenjohann
Soil Organic Matter Clogs Mineral Pores: Evidence from 1H-NMR and N2 Adsorption
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1853 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. T. Simpson, S. D. Frey, J. Six, and R. K. Thiet
Preferential Accumulation of Microbial Carbon in Aggregate Structures of No-Tillage Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1249 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Eynard, T. E. Schumacher, M. J. Lindstrom, and D. D. Malo
Aggregate Sizes and Stability in Cultivated South Dakota Prairie Ustolls and Usterts
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1360 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. M. Mikha and C. W. Rice
Tillage and Manure Effects on Soil and Aggregate-Associated Carbon and Nitrogen
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2004; 68(3): 809 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K. P. Fabrizzi, A. Moron, and F. O. Garcia
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Organic Fractions in Degraded vs. Non-Degraded Mollisols in Argentina
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1831 - 1841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. Bossuyt, J. Six, and P. F. Hendrix
Aggregate-Protected Carbon in No-tillage and Conventional Tillage Agroecosystems Using Carbon-14 Labeled Plant Residue
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1965 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. K. Whalen and C. Chang
Macroaggregate Characteristics in Cultivated Soils after 25 Annual Manure Applications
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1637 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (116)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Combrink, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Conten