SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 15 February 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:507-513 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0417
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olchin, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olchin, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Olchin, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Tillage

Residue Carbon Stabilization in Soil Aggregates of No-Till and Tillage Management of Dryland Cropping Systems

Gabe P. Olchina,*, Stephen Oglea, Serita D. Freyb, Timothy R. Filleyc, Keith Paustiana and Johan Sixd

a Natural Resource Ecology Lab. and Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
b Dep. of Natural Resources, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824
c Dep. of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
d Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Fractionation scheme for the isolation of aggregate size classes by wet sieving and macroaggregate disruption (Six et al., 2000a).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Initial and final aggregate distributions for the first two depths (0–5 and 5–15 cm) of the tillage management (TM) and no-till (NT) treatments at Sterling, CO. The macroaggregate (macros), microaggregate (micros), silt plus clay (S+C), coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM), microaggregates within macroaggregates (mM), and silt plus clay within macroaggregates (minM) fractions are expressed in terms of grams per kilogram whole soil. Error bars represent ± one standard error of the mean. Different letters represent significant differences (Bonferroni's adjustment, {alpha} = 0.05) within each sieving class among tillage treatment and depth increment. Uppercase and lowercase letters correspond to the TM and NT treatments, respectively. * Significant differences between the two tillage treatments within each aggregate class and depth combination.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Final aggregate distributions for the tillage management (TM) treatment for each depth increment (0–5, 5–15, and 15–30 cm). The macroaggregate (macros), microaggregate (micros), silt plus clay (S+C), coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM), microaggregates within macroaggregates (mM), and silt plus clay within macroaggregates (minM) fractions are expressed in terms of the whole soil. Error bars represent ± one standard error of the mean. Aggregate proportions followed by a different uppercase letter within the depth increment or isolation method are significantly different; aggregate proportions followed by a different lowercase letter within an aggregate class are significantly different (Bonferroni's adjustment, {alpha} = 0.05).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Residue-derived C stabilization for the 0- to 5- and 0- to 15-cm depth increments of the tillage management (TM) and no-till (NT) treatments at Sterling, CO. The macroaggregate (macros), microaggregate (micros), silt plus clay (S+C), coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM), microaggregates within macroaggregates (mM), and silt plus clay within macroaggregates (minM) fractions are all expressed in terms of grams residue-derived C per kilogram soil per kilogram residue-derived C added. Error bars represent ± one standard error of the mean. Different letters represent significant differences (Bonferroni's adjustment, {alpha} = 0.05) among each aggregate class within a sieving method and tillage treatment for each depth. Uppercase and lowercase letters correspond to the TM and NT treatments, respectively. * Significant difference between TM and NT within each aggregate class.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Residue-derived C stabilization across the three depths (0–5, 5–15, and 15–30 cm) of the tillage management (TM) treatment at Sterling, CO. The macroaggregate (macros), microaggregate (micros), silt plus clay (S+C), coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM), microaggregates within macroaggregates (mM), and silt plus clay within macroaggregates (minM) fractions are expressed in terms of grams residue-derived C per kilogram soil per kilogram residue-derived C added. Error bars represent ± one standard error of the mean. Different letters represent significant differences (Bonferroni's adjustment, {alpha} = 0.05) between the three depths within each aggregate class. For example, there was not a comparison made between macroaggregates and microaggregates for any depth. Uppercase and lowercase letters correspond to the wet sieving and macroaggregate-derived fractions, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.