SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 1 March 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:331-342 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0215
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, P.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, P.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, P.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Air Pollution

Chamber Measurements of Soil Nitrous Oxide Flux: Are Absolute Values Reliable?

Philippe Rochette* and Nikita S. Eriksen-Hamel

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Québec, QC, G1V 2J3, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of studies in each time interval based on the number of reported binary and numerical characteristics describing non-flow-through, non-steady-state chamber design and deployment methodology.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of studies in each time interval based on the score of each numerical characteristic describing non-flow-through, non-steady-state chamber design and deployment methodology.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of studies in each time interval based on the score of each factor describing non-flow-through, non-steady-state chamber design and deployment methodology.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Frequency distribution of studies on each continent based on the score of each factor describing non-flow-through, non-steady-state chamber design and deployment methodology (N.A. = North America; S.A. = South America).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Frequency distribution of studies in each ecosystem based on the score of each factor describing non-flow-through, non-steady-state chamber dsign and deployment methodology (Temp. = temperate; Trop. = tropical).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.