SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 January 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:151-159 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0065
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preetz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Igel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Preetz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Igel, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Preetz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Igel, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electromagnetic Induction, EMI
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Soil Mineralogy

Tropical Soils and Landmine Detection—An Approach for a Classification System

Holger Preetza,*, Sven Altfelderb and Jan Igela

a Leibniz Institute for Applied Geosciences, Stilleweg 2, D-30655 Hannover, Germany
b Federal Inst. for Geosci. and Natural Resour., Stilleweg 2, D-30655 Hannover, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Box plots of the sample geochemistry. The boxes show the upper and lower quartiles while the bars in the center show the median. The whiskers extend to the most extreme data point, with a distance from the box of no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Histogram showing the measured susceptibilities. The pie chart in the center shows the proportion of measurements with respect to the four classes described in Table 2.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Box plots of the susceptibilities. The boxes show the upper and lower quartiles while the bars in the center show the median. The whiskers extend to the most extreme data point, with a distance from the box of no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Scatter plot of susceptibilities for soils derived from all rock groups. The susceptibility is plotted against the degree of weathering.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Individual scatter plots of soil susceptibilities according to rock groups. The susceptibility is plotted against the degree of weathering.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Scatterplot of selected statistical parameters of the susceptibility distribution corresponding to the weathering classes of soils for two exemplary rock groups.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.