SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 May 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1038-1044 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0170
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godsey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lamond, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Godsey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lamond, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Godsey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lamond, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Soil pH

Changes in Soil pH, Organic Carbon, and Extractable Aluminum from Crop Rotation and Tillage

Chad B. Godseya,*, Gary M. Pierzynskib, David B. Mengelb and Ray E. Lamondb

a Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
b Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The interaction of depth and rotation for pH after 30 yr of crop rotation on a Reading and Muir silt loam. An asterisk indicates significant differences between rotations for the same depth ({alpha} = 0.05). Key to rotations: SOSO = continuous grain sorghum; SYSO = soybean-grain sorghum; SYSY = continuous soybean; WHSY = wheat-soybean; WHWH = continuous wheat.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. The interaction of depth, tillage, and rotation for organic carbon after 30 yr of crop rotation on a Reading and Muir silt loam.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The interaction of depth, tillage, and rotation for KCl extractable-Al after 30 yr of crop rotation on a Reading and Muir silt loam.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. The interaction of depth, tillage, and rotation for CuCl2 extractable-Al after 30 yr of crop rotation on a Reading and Muir silt loam.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Potassium chloride (1 M) extractable-Al as a function of pH for all sample depths.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Copper chloride (0.5 M) extractable-Al as a function of pH for all sample depths.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. The difference between 0.5 M CuCl2 and 1 M KCl extractable-Al as a function of pH.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.