SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:529-536 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0254
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heitman, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspar, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heitman, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspar, T. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heitman, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspar, T. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nonequilibrium Transport
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Field Measurement of Soil Surface Chemical Transport Properties for Comparison of Management Zones

J.L. Heitmana,*, A. Gaurb, R. Hortonc, D. B. Jaynesd and T. C. Kaspard

a Agronomy Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
b International Water Management Inst., c/o ICRISAT, Patancheru, AP 502 324 India
c Agronomy Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
d National Soil Tilth Research Lab., Ames, IA 50011


Figure 1
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. A dripper transect (left) and an individual dripper during measurement (right).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Soil surface conditions for no-till (A) with and (B) without residue and for chisel plow (C) with and (D) without residue.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Examples of the Jaynes et al. (1995) approach for determining chemical transport parameters (R = relative resident concentration and t* = scaled time).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Example breakthrough curves for the no-till nontrafficked transect. Dots represent measurements and lines represent fitted values.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Example breakthrough curves for the no-till trafficked transect. Dots represent measurements and lines represent fitted values.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Example breakthrough curves for the chisel plow nontrafficked transect. Dots represent measurements and lines represent fitted values.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Example breakthrough curves for the chisel plow trafficked transect. Dots represent measurements and lines represent fitted values.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.