SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:336-346 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0203
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oorts, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolardot, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oorts, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolardot, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Oorts, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolardot, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Tillage

Modeling Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in No-till and Conventional Tillage Using PASTIS Model

Katrien Oortsa, P. Garnierb, A. Findelingc, B. Maryd, G. Richarde and B. Nicolardotf,*

a INRA, Unité d'agronomie de Laon-Reims-Mons, 2 Esplanade Roland Garros, BP 224, 51686 Reims Cedex 2, France
b INRA, Unité d'Agronomie de Laon-Reims-Mons, rue Fernand Christ, 02007 Laon Cedex, France
c IRAD, Unité de Recherche Risque Environnemental, avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
d INRA, Unité d'Agronomie de Laon-Reims-Mons, rue Fernand Christ, 02007 Laon Cedex, France
e INRA, Unité de Science du Sol d'Orléans, 2163 Domaine de Limère, BP 20619, 45166 Olivet, France
f INRA, Unité d'agronomie de Laon-Reims-Mons, 2 Esplanade Roland Garros, BP 224, 51686 Reims Cedex 2, France


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Measured and simulated water contents of the 0- to 5- and 5- to 20-cm soil layers of the conventional tillage and no-tillage plots. Symbols are measured data, lines are simulated data.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Simulated water contents of the surface mulch of the no-tillage plot.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Simulated cumulative total evaporation at the top and water drainage at the bottom of the 0- to 25-cm soil profile of the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) plots.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Measured and simulated amounts of C in crop residues of the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) plots. Bars indicate standard errors of the measured values.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Measured and simulated NO3–N contents in the 0- to 5- and 0- to 25-cm soil layers in the conventional tillage plots under the assumption that crop residues in the PASTIS model are homogeneously distributed throughout the entire soil volume. Bars indicate standard errors of the measured values.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Measured and simulated NO3–N contents in the 0- to 5- and 0- to 25-cm soil layers in the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage plots, under the assumption that crop residues in CT are located in 10% of the entire soil volume. Bars indicate standard errors of the measured values.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Measured and simulated cumulative CO2 emission in the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) plots, under the assumption that crop residues in CT are located in 10% of the entire soil volume.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Measured and simulated daily CO2 emissions in the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage plots, under the assumption that crop residues in CT are located in 10% of the entire soil volume. Bars indicate standard errors of the measured values.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Simulated cumulative CO2 emissions as a product of decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM) and crop residues in the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) plots, under the assumption that crop residues in CT are located in 10% of the entire soil volume.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. Simulated daily CO2 emissions as a product of decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM) and crop residues in the conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) plots, under the assumption that crop residues in CT are located in 10% of the entire soil volume.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.