SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:298-305 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0145
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ilg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ilg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ilg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Laboratory Column Studies
Right arrow Colloids

Comparing Unsaturated Colloid Transport through Columns with Differing Sampling Systems

Katrin Ilga, Eckhard Ferbera,*, Heiner Stoffregenb, Andreas Winklerc, Asaf Pekdegerc, Martin Kaupenjohannd and Jan Siemensd

a Dep. of Soil Science, Inst. of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
b Dep. of Soil Protection, Inst. of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
c Dep. of Geochemistry, Hydrogeology and Mineralogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Malteser Straße 74-100, D-12249 Berlin, Germany
d Dep. of Soil Science, Inst. of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Column with a membrane lysimeter. The tube acts as a hanging water column, ensuring unsaturated conditions.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Exemplary NO3 and goethite breakthrough curves of all lysimeter types (small colloid concentration applied).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Exemplary NO3 and goethite breakthrough curves of all lysimeter types (large colloid concentration applied)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Cumulative breakthrough curves (in percentage of the total amount in the outflow) of NO3and goethite. Goethite tends to move faster through the sand than NO3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Depth profiles of colloids in sand, wick, and outflow (second run with large colloid concentrations). The accumulation of 59Fe in the top 3 cm of the sand illustrates that unsaturated sand was a good filter for goethite colloids. Note the absence of colloids in the sand directly above the zero-tension lysimeter, which is probably related to saturated conditions above the lysimeter–soil interface. Colloids were trapped in the wick.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.