SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:2049-2056 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0366N
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, C.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Forest Soils

Stabilization of Organic Matter at Micropores (<2 nm) in Acid Forest Subsoils

Robert Mikuttaa,* and Christian Mikuttab

a Institut für Bodenkunde und Pflanzenernährung, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Weidenplan 14, D-06108 Halle, Germany
b Institut für Ökologie, Technische Universität Berlin, Salzufer 12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K of selected subsoil samples used in our study showing a range of observed hystereses. The adsorption–desorption isotherms of Samples 7 and 11 are representative whereas Sample 6 exhibits the largest hysteresis among the samples due to the prevalence of smectite. Note that the isotherms are stacked by a value of 20 cm3 g–1 for better visualization.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Micropore volumes of ferrihydrite, Na-bentonite, and Na-vermiculite determined by N2 adsorption at 77 K and CO2 adsorption at 273 K.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Nitrogen micropore volume (MIV-N2) after NaOCl treatment versus the CO2 micropore volume after NaOCl treatment corrected for CO2 sorption to stable OM (MIV-CO2corr) (a); plot of the N2–MIVs determined before and after NaOCl treatment (b).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Small mesopore volume (2–10 nm) corrected for the weight of residual OM after NaOCl treatment versus the average volume of the mineral-associated stable OM assuming a minimal and maximal OM density of 1.4 and 1.9 g cm–3 (vertical error bars). The amount of mineral-associated stable OM was determined as the fraction that was released by 10% HF following the NaOCl treatment.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Transmission electron images of a small aggregate in the fine clay fraction (<0.2 µm) of the Eutric Hapludand (Sample 11) after treatment with NaOCl. The A-B line represents the spatial distribution of Si, Al, Fe, and stable OC as analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.