SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 August 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1591-1599 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0081
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kranabetter, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dube, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kranabetter, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dube, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kranabetter, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dube, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions

The Contrasting Response to Soil Disturbance between Lodgepole Pine and Hybrid White Spruce in Subboreal Forests

J. M. Kranabettera,*, P. Sanbornb, B. K. Chapmanc and S. Dubed

a British Columbia Ministry of Forests, BAG 6000, Smithers, BC, V0J 2N0 Canada
b Univ. of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, V2N 4Z9 Canada
c British Columbia Ministry of Forests, 200-640 Borland St., Williams Lake, BC, V2G 4T1 Canada
d British Columbia Ministry of Forests, 1011 4th Ave., Prince George, BC, V2L 3H9 Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Trends in mineralizable N concentrations between preharvest (Year 0), posttreatment (Year 1) and Years 5 and 10 for (a) mineral soil and (b) forest floors. (Selected plots only for SBSmc and SBSwk; SE as error bars). OM1–bole only removal; OM3-Whole-tree and forest floor removed; C0–no compaction; C1–light compaction; C2–heavy compaction.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Net NH4+ mineralized (kg ha–1) in 5-wk in situ incubation for mineral soils + forest floors across soil disturbance treatments at Year 12 (sites and species split-plots combined; SE as error bars).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Tree height and height increment of lodgepole pine and hybrid white spruce at Year 12 across soil disturbance treatments (both sites combined; SE as error bars).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (a) Foliar N concentrations of lodgepole pine and hybrid white spruce at Year 12 across soil disturbance treatments (both sites combined; SE as error bars), and (b) relationship between height increment and foliar N concentrations at Year 12 for lodgepole pine (pl) and hybrid white spruce (sx) for both sites (SBSmc, Subboreal Spruce Biogeoclimatic zone moist and cold; SBSwk, Subboreal Spruce Biogeoclimatic Zone wet and cool).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.