SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 August 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1504-1511 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0113
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Firestone, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Herman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Firestone, M. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Firestone, M. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling

Root Influence on Nitrogen Mineralization and Nitrification in Avena barbata Rhizosphere Soil

D. J. Herman*, K. K. Johnson, C. H. Jaeger, III, E. Schwartz and M. K. Firestone

Dep. of Environmental Science Policy and Management, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; E. Schwartz, current address: Northern Arizona State Univ., Flagstaff, AZ


Figure 1
View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram of plant growth microcosms. About 8 wk after Avena barbata germination, the solid divider separating the two compartments of the microcosm was replaced by a divider with a 5-mm high horizontal slot approximately 3 cm below the soil line. The pattern of root and soil harvest is shown on the right.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Live, dead, and total bacterial numbers in rhizosphere and bulk soils. Total cells = live cells + dead cells. Cell numbers were log10 transformed before analysis. Error bars indicate standard error of the means.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Principal component analysis plot of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) patterns generated from rhizosphere soil, bulk soil, and control soil. Error bars represent two standards of deviation. Principal component 1 explained 44% of the variation in the data set while component 2 represented 20% of the variation.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) fragments present in significantly (p < 0.05) different amounts between rhizosphere and bulk soils. Error bars represent two standards of deviation.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Rates of potential nitrification, gross nitrification, and NH4 consumption in rhizosphere soil along Avena barbata roots. Error bars indicate standard error of the means. Means sharing a common letter within the same graph are not significantly different (P < 0.05).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.