SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 21 June 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1349-1358 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0300
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by López-Hernández, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by López-Hernández, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by López-Hernández, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling

A Comparison of Four Methods of Measuring Gross Phosphorus Mineralization

Laurie E. Kellogga,*, Scott D. Bridghamb and Danilo López-Hernándezc

a Dep. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Univ. of Minnesota, 100 Ecology, Saint Paul, MN 55108
b Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 5289 Univ. of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-5289
c Laboratorio de Estudios Ambientales, Instituto de Zoología Tropical, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 47058, Caracas 1041-A,Venezuela


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Specific activity for (a) bicarbonate-extracted Pi, (b) water-extracted Pi, and (c) Pm pool for all four soil types. Values are mean ± SD.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Concentrations for (a) bicarbonate- and (b) water-extracted Pi and (c) microbial P (Pm). Values are mean ± SD.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Concentrations of 32P for (a) bicarbonate- and (b) water-extracted Pi and (c) microbial (Pm). Values are mean ± SD.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. E(t) for the sterilized incubations and the simulation model for three of the four soil types: (a) Histosol, (b) Entisol, and (c) Ultisol. Values are mean ± SD.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Fraction of added 32Pi found in the adsorbed pool in the sterile versus the nonsterile soil incubations with bicarbonate or water extractants in the four soil types: (a) Alfisol, (b) Histosol, (c) Entisol, and (d) Ultisol. Values are mean ± SD.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.