SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 April 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:986-994 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0107
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, M. H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, M. H. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, M. H. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Humic Substances
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Geochemical Processes
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Solvent Systems for the Isolation of Organic Components from Soils

Michael H. B. Hayes*

Chemical and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Limerick, Ireland


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diffusion ordered spectroscopy spectrum of the International Humic Substances Society peat humic acid standard in D2O after the addition of 5 µL ethanoic acid (after Simpson, 2002).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cross polarization magic angle spinning 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra for humic acids (HAs) isolated from a silty clay grassland soil by the International Humic Substances Society procedure at pH 7 (1), 10.6 (2), or 12.6 (3), and for the HA precipitated from dilute solution at pH 2 from the extract at pH 12.6 (spectrum 4) and subjected to the resin in tandem separation procedure. Spectra 5, 6, and 7 are for fulvic acids, and 8, 9, and 10 are for the XAD-4 (styrenedivinylbenzene) acids from the pH 7, 10.6, and 12.6 extracts, respectively, and fractionated by the resin in tandem process. Spectrum 11 is for the XAD-4 neutrals.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cross-polarization–total sideband suppression (CP/TOSS) 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of humic acids (HAs) isolated in 0.1 M NaOH at pH 12, and in 0.1 M NaOH + 6 M urea after prior exhaustive extractions at pH 7 and at 10.6. CON = amide, COO = carboxyl, Arom-C = aromatic carbon; OC = oxygen alkyl carbon; alipha. = aliphatic carbon.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Cross polarization magic angle spinning 13C NMR spectrum of the residual organic materials not extracted from soil in base + 6 M urea.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. A hypothetical representation of associations between dimethylsulfoxide and the carboxyl, phenolic, and other hydroxyl functional groups in humic substances. R represents the remainder of the humic structures stretching from the complexed carboxyl and phenolic or other hydroxyl functional groups; {phi} represents an aromatic functionality.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.