SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 April 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:930-939 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0167
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Meulen, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cammeraat, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van der Meulen, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cammeraat, L. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van der Meulen, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cammeraat, L. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Soil Conservation
Right arrow Irrigation

Effects of Irrigation and Plastic Mulch on Soil Properties on Semiarid Abandoned Fields

E. S. van der Meulen, L. Nol and L. H. Cammeraat*

IBED Physical Geography, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands


Figure 1
View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The study area and the two field sites; the lake area near Puentes Lake or Embalse de Puentes (L site), and the area of Las Hermanicas between Zarcilla de Ramos and La Paca (H site).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (158K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Collapsed pipes at the edges of a field (LP5) on plastic covered soils, with a continuous plastic sheet still present at a depth of about 1.5 to 5 cm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The particle size distribution for the fraction <0.106 mm, obtained by Microscan, for the plastic fields (20PH, 5PH, 5PL, 2PL) and the accompanying control fields (20CH, 8CH, 5CL, 2CL). Results are presented for the untreated samples, samples treated with ultrasound (US), which represents the texture distribution of primary particles and microaggregates.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Organic C content (with standard deviation) for the plastic covered fields and control fields. ‘v’ = under vegetation; ‘b’ = underneath bare surface; 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 refer to centimeter depth; H = Hermanicas site and L = Lake site.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water retention curves with measurements and data fitted by TDRana plotted for plastic fields (P) and control fields (C).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Total runoff and sediment yield from the rainfall simulation experiments.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The measured indicators of soil quality give rise to this theory about the effects of irrigation combined with evaporation reduction by plastic soil surface covers in the past. The effects are still reinforcing each other.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.