SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 March 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:795-805 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0099
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Serna-Pérez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Serna-Pérez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Serna-Pérez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions

Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Exhumed Petrocalcic Horizons

Alfonso Serna-Péreza, H. Curtis Mongerb,*, Jeffrey E. Herrickc and Leigh Murrayd

a Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pacuarias, Calera, Zacatecas 98500, Mexico
b Dep. of Plant and Environmental Science, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003
c USDA-ARS, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM 88003
d Univ. Statistics Center, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003


Figure 1
View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of study site and illustration of the three soil types. (A) Chihuahuan Desert and location of study site in New Mexico. (B) Locations of blocks and quadrats for the three soil types. The map units are of geomorphic units, including states of erosion (Monger et al., 2006). (C) Cross-section illustrating the three soil types evaluated for their CO2 emissions. (D) Example of a noneroded petrocalcic horizon soil (NEPHS) in the study area.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Soil CO2 emissions based on NaOH traps for the three sampling blocks. Soil temperature was taken at 10 cm at Jornada Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) weather station. Rainfall is the accumulated amounts between sampling dates (weekly from July to September and biweekly October to May). Soil temperature and rainfall share the same scale on the graph. Means with ** are different at {alpha} = 0.05. Means with * are different at {alpha} = 0.20. Arrows pointing up signify times when exhumed petrocalcic horizon soils (EPHS) is higher than at least one of the other two soil types. Arrows pointing down signify times when EPHS is lower than at least one of the other two soil types.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil CO2 emissions using soda lime traps for the three sampling blocks. Soil temperature and rainfall are the same as described in Fig. 2. Means with ** are different at {alpha} = 0.05. Means with * are different at {alpha} = 0.20. Arrows pointing up signify times when exhumed petrocalcic horizon soils (EPHS) is higher than at least one of the neighboring soils. Arrows pointing down signify times when EPHS is lower than at least one neighboring soil.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Fractionation values between {delta}13C values of standards and {delta}13C values of alkali traps. Reaction time for all alkali traps was 24 h except CDG6d which was 6 d.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Carbon isotopic values ({delta}13C) of CO2 emissions after correction using fractionation factors. Each point is the mean of n = 12 (i.e., four replications in each plot times three plots per soil type). Range of atmospheric CO2 from Clark and Fritz (1997). Range of C4 black grama and C3 mesquite, shown with black boxes, are from Connin et al. (1997a) and Monger (2003). Values for pedogenic carbonates shown in upper left of top figure are from the following areas in the Jornada Basin: (1) Stressor site; (2) Mayfield well; (3), (4), and (5) Liu (2002); (6) Connin et al. (1997a, 1997b). Open circles are Stage I pedogenic carbonates formed in coppice dunes.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.