SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 March 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:718-727 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0183
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buczko, U.
Right arrow Articles by Bens, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buczko, U.
Right arrow Articles by Bens, O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Buczko, U.
Right arrow Articles by Bens, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Water repellency
Right arrow Soil Analysis

Assessing Soil Hydrophobicity and Its Variability through the Soil Profile Using Two Different Methods

U. Buczko* and O. Bens

Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Chair of Soil Protection and Recultivation, P.O. Box 101344, D-03013 Cottbus Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Box and whisker plots of contact angles for the four study plots and the different soil horizons (for each horizon, n = 30). Short-dashed vertical lines within the boxes denote mean and solid lines median values.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Box and whisker plots of log(WDPT) for the four study plots and the different soil horizons (for each horizon, n = 30). Short-dashed vertical lines within the boxes denote mean and solid lines median values. WDPT, water drop penetration time.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between mean contact angle and mean water drop penetration time (WDPT) values of the 72 samples from the four study plots. The dotted horizontal line denotes the boundary between WDPT values < 5 s (= wettable) and > 5 s (= repellent sensu lato). The dashed vertical line denotes the boundary between contact angles lower than 90° (wettable) and higher than 90° (repellent).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dependency of heterogeneity from sample volume: heterogeneity index (HI) values for contact angle (CA) and log(WDPT) at different soil depths (exemplarily for two study plots) calculated for each sample (100 cm3) and for all three samples of a soil horizon (300 cm3). WDPT, water drop penetration time.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.