SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 December 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:141-152 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0073
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Air Pollution
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Acid-base Characteristics of Soils in the Adirondack Mountains, New York

Timothy J. Sullivana,*, Ivan J. Fernandezb, Alan T. Herlihyc, Charles T. Driscolld, Todd C. McDonnelle, Nancy A. Nowickie, Kai U. Snydera and James W. Sutherlandf

a E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., P.O. Box 609, Corvallis, OR 97339
b Dep. of Plant Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
c Dep. of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
d Dep. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY 13244
e SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210
f NYS Dep. of Environmental Conservation, Bureau of Watershed Management, Albany, NY 12233



View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Locations of soil pits in EMAP watersheds sampled for this study, coded by measured B horizon base saturation.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparison of base saturation results between original (A sample) and replicate (B sample) soil samples. O horizon data are depicted as closed circles and B horizon data as open circles.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mean composition of the effective cation-exchange capacity (CECe) and pHs from all watershed samples analyzed in the Adirondack watershed sampling conducted in 2003.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between watershed-aggregated B horizon soil base saturation and lakewater ANC for the 70 study lake watersheds.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Correlations between total C and effective cation exchange capacity (CECe) from all watershed samples analyzed in the Adirondack watershed sampling conducted in 2003.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Correlations between total C in the soil and H+ in equilibrium soil solutions from the soil pH in water measurements.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Cumulative distribution functions for a common population of Adirondack lake watersheds constructed for DDRP data collected in the mid 1980s and data compiled or collected in this study for EMAP lake watersheds in the early 1990s (lake chemistry) and in 2003 (soil chemistry). Comparisons are shown for (A) lakewater ANC, (B) B horizon soil base saturation, and (C) B horizon soil exchangeable Ca2+.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.