SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1955-1966 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0060
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydrophobicity
Right arrow Volcanic Soils
Right arrow Water repellency

Characterizing Water Dependent Soil Repellency with Minimal Parameter Requirement

C. M. Regalado* and A. Ritter

Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias (ICIA), Dep. Suelos y Riegos, Apdo. 60 La Laguna, 38200 Tenerife, Spain



View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a, b) Location of the experimental site and sampling design: (c) random sampling for soil physicochemical properties, and (d) uniform for molarity of an ethanol droplet (MED) determinations.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean repellency curves, indicating the parameters selected for their description, (a) in terms of contact angle, {alpha}; or (b) surface free energy of the solid, {gamma}s. Bars indicate 95% confidence interval. For repellency parameter definitions see caption in Table 2.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Probability plots of repellency parameters. Vertical axes show the expected value, Zpi.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Box-Cox normality plots of repellency parameters. Vertical axes show the correlation coefficient. For repellency parameter definitions see caption in Table 2.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Correlation of the repellency parameters {theta}g-max and {theta}g-min with the soil water retention parameters (a) {theta}wp and (b) {theta}fc.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Correlation of the integrated area below the repellency curve, S, with other repellency parameters such as the water content at maximum, {theta}g-max, and minimum repellency, {theta}g-min, and with soil organic matter content (OM).

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Flow diagram of the strategy proposed for characterizing the repellency curve with a minimal number of determinations. IRDI: Integrative Repellency Dynamic Index; OM: organic matter; Se: surface area; {theta}fc and {theta}wp: water content at field capacity and wilting point, respectively. For repellency parameter definitions see caption in Table 2.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.