HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leij, F. J. Articles by Ross, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Leij, F. J. Articles by Ross, P. J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Leij, F. J. Articles by Ross, P. J. Related Collections Soil Physics Water Retention/Capillary Pressure Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation

Soil Water Retention

II. Derivation and Application of Shape Index

^a Laboratoire d'Etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, LTHE (UMR 5564, CNRS, INPG, UJF, IRD), BP 53X, 38041, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France
^b Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Paseo Cuauhnáhuac 8532, Col. Progresso 62550 Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico
^c CSIRO Land and Water, Indooroopilly, Qld. 4067, Australia

View larger version (36K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Outline of presentation of shape index with equation numbers for parameter conversion.

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Shape index PvG computed for GRIZZLY according to Eq. [5] with k = 2, r = 0 as a function of clay and sand percentage.

View larger version (26K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Parametric shape index PBC according to Eq. [7] and PvG according to Eq. [9a], [10a], and [8], that is, the first- and second-order approximation and the exact expression, computed from optimized r, s, , m, and n as a function of the experimental shape index, P, using samples from UNSODA with a positive r. Coefficients for the correlation between all shape indices are provided in the insert.

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Effect of r as an optimization parameter for k = 2 on 247 samples of GRIZZLY database: (a) mn2 as a function of mn0,2 and (b) PvG computed from optimization results with r > 0 versus results for r fixed at 0.

View larger version (11K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Parameter optimization to retention data from GRIZZLY with r = 0 using the BC and vG equations (k = 2): (a) 0 as a function of mn0,2 and (b) PBC as a function of PvG.

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Optimizing vG equation to water content of 655 soils from GRIZZLY: RMSE if shape factor mn2 is independently predicted from BC equation with PBC = PvG versus RMSE if mn2 is included in the optimization.

View larger version (12K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Shape parameter 0 estimated from parameters of the vG equation, as a function of optimized 0 for 660 samples from GRIZZLY: (a) estimation from shape index, PvG, and (b) estimation with = mn1.

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. The effect of the user index, k, for optimizations of GRIZZLY data with r = 0: (a) shape parameters mn0,k for user index k = 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 as a function of mn0,2, and (b) shape index, PvG, for user index k = 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10, as a function of PvG for k = 2.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9. The water retention shape index PvG as a function of mn0,k according to Eq. [5] for user index k = 0, 1, 2, 10 for the vG equation and k for the BC equation.

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 10. The effect of variations in r on shape parameters: (a) /0 and mn2/mn0,2 using a first- and second-order approximation (left-hand axis) and the distribution of samples with a nonzero r (right-hand axis) from GRIZZLY as a function of r/s and (b) mn2/mn0,2 using different m0,2 (left-hand axis) and the distribution of samples with a nonzero r (right-hand axis) from UNSODA.

View larger version (22K): [in a new window]   Fig. 11. Predictability of residual water content and shape factor with the first-order approximation of the shape index using Eq. [22]: (a) predicted versus optimized r/s and (b) predicted versus optimized mnk.