SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1881-1890 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0225
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, P. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Retention/Capillary Pressure
Right arrow Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation
Right arrow Soil Physics

Soil Water Retention

I. Introduction of a Shape Index

R. Haverkampa,*, F. J. Leij, C. Fuentesb, A. Sciortinoc and P. J. Rossd

a Laboratoire d'Etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, LTHE (UMR 5564, CNRS, INPG, UJF, IRD), BP 53X, 38041, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France
b Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Paseo Cuauhnáhuac 8532, Col. Progresso 62550 Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico
c Dep. of Civil Engineering, California State Univ., Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
d CSIRO Land and Water, Indooroopilly, Qld. 4067, Australia



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Textural distribution of databases: (a) 406 samples from UNSODA and (b) 660 samples from GRIZZLY.

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Histogram of dry bulk density, {theta}b, and organic matter content, OM, for 660 samples from GRIZZLY.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Histogram of the vG-shape factor mn0,2 optimized for 660 samples from GRIZZLY.

 




View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Saturated water content obtained from different parameterizations for 660 samples from GRIZZLY as a function of {theta}s for the van Genuchten (vG) equation with the Burdine condition (k = 2) and {theta}r = 0: (a) {theta}s for the Brooks-Corey (BC) equation (k->{infty}) with {theta}r = 0, (b) {theta}s for the vG equation with the Mualem condition (k = 1) with {theta}r = 0, and (c) {theta}s for the vG equation with the Burdine condition (k = 2) with {theta}r > 0.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The shape factor mn with {theta}r optimized as a function of mn0,2 with {theta}r = 0 for the van Genuchten equation for 253 samples from GRIZZLY subject to the Burdine condition (k = 2).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The van Genuchten shape factor mn0,k for three different user indices, k, as a function of the Brooks-Corey shape parameter {lambda}0 for 660 samples from GRIZZLY.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The behavior of optimized hydraulic parameters for GRIZZLY as a function of the user index for the van Genuchten equation with k->{infty} representing the Brooks-Corey equation: (a) values for {theta}s, hvG or hBC and mn0,k or {lambda}0 divided by their maximum obtained for either {theta}r = 0 or {theta}r > 0 as a function of k (error bars denote 95% confidence limits) and (b) adjusted RMSE as a function of k with {theta}r fixed (=0) or optimized (≥0).

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Distribution of shape index, P, calculated for 461 soil samples from UNSODA and 612 samples from GRIZZLY.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Shape index computed from retention data as a function of clay and sand percentage plotted for 51 data points for: (a) UNSODA, and (b) GRIZZLY.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.