SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 September 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1861-1870 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0002
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Megonigal, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Megonigal, J. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Megonigal, J. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Wetland Soils

Rhizosphere Iron (III) Deposition and Reduction in a Juncus effusus L.-Dominated Wetland

Johanna V. Weissa,*, David Emersonb and J. Patrick Megonigalc

a George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA 22030, Present address: U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20142
b American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA 20110
c Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD 21037-0028



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of a Juncus-dominated wetland. Each data point in Panels A through C is the average of six duplicate readings along the transect, two at each end and in the middle. Measurements were taken at the standing water surface (SURFACE), at the water–soil interface (DEPTH), and in the pore water (where applicable).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes in root and soil biomass during anaerobic decomposition. All data points represent the average of five harvested bags ± 1 standard error. The m0 is the initial biomass and the m is biomass at each time point.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Changes in Fe fractions during anaerobic decomposition. All columns represent the average total Fe of five buried bags collected at each time interval ±1 standard error.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Fe(III) reduction of root and soil Fe pools during anaerobic incubation. The Fe measured at each data point was converted to mg Fe and then multiplied by the percentage of Fe(III) at each harvest time to obtain the ratio of Fe(III)t to Fe(III)0. Error bars represent ±1 standard error.

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Changes in Fe bacteria during anaerobic decomposition. All columns represent the average number of FeOB or FeRB of five bags collected at each harvest ±1 standard error.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.