SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 August 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1440-1447 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0309
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, W.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, W.-F.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, W.-F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Surface Hydrology
Right arrow Soil Conservation

Validation of WEPP Sediment Feedback Relationships using Spatially Distributed Rill Erosion Data

X.-C. Zhanga,*, Z.-B. Lib and W.-F. Dingc

a USDA-ARS, Grazinglands Research Lab., 7207 W. Cheyenne St., El Reno, OK 73036
b Xi'an Technology Univ., Xi'an, Shaanxi 710048, PRC, and Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, PRC
c Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Yangtse Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, PRC



View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of experiment setup.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes of average flow velocity and flow width along the slope profile at the 10.5% slope with scouring time and inflow rates.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects of sediment loading rates on downslope rill detachment during scouring tests at the 10.5% slope and five inflow rates.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of sediment loading rates on downslope rill detachment during scouring tests at the 15.8% slope and five inflow rates.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of sediment loading rates on downslope rill detachment during scouring tests at the 21.2% slope and five inflow rates.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Rill detachment capacity as a function of flow shear stress.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Fitted detachment capacity (Dc) and sediment transport capacity (Tc) as well as calculated rate control coefficients (Dc/Tc) as functions of flow shear stress.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model-calculated rill detachment rates versus rare earth element (REE)-measured detachment rates at each measurement interval and segment at all slopes and inflow rates.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.