HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dontsova, K. M. Articles by Johnston, C. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dontsova, K. M. Articles by Johnston, C. T. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Dontsova, K. M. Articles by Johnston, C. T. Related Collections Soil Chemistry

Calcium and Magnesium Effects on Ammonia Adsorption by Soil Clays

^a Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907-1968
^b USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Lab., West Lafayette, IN 47907
^c Currently at the Univ. of Mississippi, duty station: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180

View larger version (23K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of ammonia distribution in the soil. M is metal exchangeable cation; OM—organic matter. Species not present in model clay system are marked in gray.

View larger version (27K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Change in the weight of the Mg-exchanged Fayette sample as experiment progresses. Dashed vertical lines indicate times at which spectra shown on Fig. 3 were taken.

View larger version (27K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of dry Fayette Mg sample before ammonia injection (a), immediately after ammonia injection (b), and 25 min after injection (c). Difference between Spectra c and a (d).

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Correlation between amount of ammonium adsorbed and water displaced for Blount and Fayette soil clays.

View larger version (42K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Nitrogen retention in Blount and Fayette soil clays as a function of the exchangeable cation and relative humidity (RH). "Wet" samples were equilibrated at 90% RH, while "dry" were at 2% RH. Significant differences at 0.05 probability level are indicated by the different letters within the same measure: NH+4, NH3, and NH+4 + NH3.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Correlation between ammonium and water content for Blount and Fayette clays, and Fayette without organic matter (OM) at 2% relative humidity. Each point represents one sample.

View larger version (46K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Effect of organic matter (OM) removal on NH3 sorption by Fayette clay. "Wet" samples were equilibrated at 90% RH, while "dry" were at 2% RH. Significant differences at 0.05 probability level are indicated by the different letters within the same measure: NH+4, NH3, and NH+4 + NH3.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Correlation between ammonia and water content for Blount and Fayette soil clays at 2% and 90% relative humidity.