SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 May 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:872-882 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0178
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iqbal, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Iqbal, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Iqbal, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions
Right arrow Remote Sensing
Right arrow Soil Systems
Right arrow Soil Physics

Relationships between Soil–Landscape and Dryland Cotton Lint Yield

Javed Iqbala,*, John J. Readb, Alex J. Thomassona and Johnie N. Jenkinsb

a Dep. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Box 9632, Mississippi State, MS 39762
b USDA-ARS, Crop Science Research Lab., P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Average minimum and maximum temperatures and total monthly precipitation at the farm for 2001 and 2002.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Functional flow of topographic and hydrologic features extraction process in a geographic information system. First, the real-time kinematic-global positioning system elevation data was converted to a 4.71-m grid then depressions known as sinks were filled, and subsequently slope, aspect, flow direction (FlowDir), flow accumulation (FlowAcc), wetness index (WetIndx), and sediment transport index (SedTInd) maps were derived. While the combination of flow direction and flow accumulation maps were used to derive stream network map. DEM = digital elevation model.

 


View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cotton lint yield monitor data for 2001 and 2002 draped over a three-dimensional field elevation (real-time kinematic-global positioning system) map along with elevation contours and classified bare soil near-infrared band (wavelength of 950 nm with 100-nm bandwidth) with 0.5-m spatial resolution. Stream networks are superimposed on a bare soil imagery map to depict landscape hydrology–soil catena process–yield interaction on a field scale.

 


View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Grid-based topographic and hydrologic attributes maps of (a) slope, (b) aspect, (c) curvature, and (d) sedimentation transport index (SedTInd) of the field derived from real-time kinematic-global positioning system elevation data using ArcView (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1998).

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Grid-based derived hydrologic attributes maps of (a) wetness index (WetIndx), (b) flow accumulation (FlowAcc), (c) flow length (FlowLth), and (d) flow direction (Flow Dir) of the field derived from real-time kinematic-global positioning system elevation data using ArcView (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1998).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.