SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 11 April 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:729-737 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0239
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cavalcanti, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lockaby, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cavalcanti, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lockaby, B. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cavalcanti, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lockaby, B. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Root Growth
Right arrow Wetland Soils

Effects of Sediment Deposition on Fine Root Dynamics in Riparian Forests

Guadalupe G. Cavalcanti* and B. Graeme Lockaby

School of Forestry and Wildlife Science, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5418



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Location of catchments at Ft. Benning, GA, where ephemeral streams were situated. An expanded view of one catchment shows placement of upper (circle) and lower (triangle) plot pairs within stream drainage.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Total live and dead fine root standing crop biomass (0.1–3.0 mm) to a depth of 11 cm on highly disturbed (HD) areas. Error bars represent one standard error; * represents significant at the 0.05 level.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Total live and dead fine root standing crop biomass (0.1–3.0 mm) to a depth of 11 cm on moderately disturbed (MD) areas. Error bars represent one standard error; * represents significant at the 0.05 level.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Total live and dead fine root standing crop biomass (0.1–3.0 mm) to a depth of 11 cm on reference (RF) areas. Error bars represent one standard error; * represents significant at the 0.05 level.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Comparison of fine root production estimates (g m–2 yr–1) between treatments in the three disturbance categories. Error bars represent one standard error of each treatment. Different lowercase letters denote significant difference between treatments at the 0.05 level.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Relationship between fine root net primary productivity (NPP) and rates of sediment deposition.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.