SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 April 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:718-728 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2003.0340
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritschi, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hutmacher, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fritschi, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hutmacher, R. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fritschi, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hutmacher, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling

Recovery of Residual Fertilizer-N and Cotton Residue-N by Acala and Pima Cotton

Felix B. Fritschia,*, Bruce A. Robertsc, D. William Rainsb, Robert L. Travisb and Robert B. Hutmacherd

a 9611 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 936438
b Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616
c Dep. of Plant Science, California State Univ. Fresno, 2415 E. San Ramen Ave., Fresno, CA 93740
d Univ. of California, Shafter Research and Extension Center, 17053 N. Shafter Ave., Shafter CA 93263



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Recovery of fall incorporated (Acala in 1998; Pima in 1999) 15N-labeled aboveground cotton residue N by Acala and Pima cotton in the next growing season (Acala: 1999; Pima: 2000) or the second growing season since residue application (Acala: 2000) as affected by N treatment. Bars indicate standard errors of three (Pima) or four (Acala) replicates.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Recovery of fertilizer–15N applied in the spring of 1998 (Acala) or 1999 (Pima) and remaining in soil and root component or cycled back in aboveground cotton residue (residue) at the end of the season, by cotton grown in the 1999 (Acala) and 2000 (Acala and Pima) seasons. Bars indicate standard errors of three (Pima) or four (Acala) replicates.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Acala fertilizer–15N recovery in microplots labeled either in the soil and root component or amended with labeled aboveground cotton residue. In microplots with labeled belowground components, fertilizer was applied in spring 1998, labeled cotton residue was exchanged with nonlabeled residue at the end of the 1998 season, and recovery in the soil was determined after harvest in 1999 and 2000. In microplots amended with 15N-labeled aboveground cotton residue in the fall of 1998, recovery was determined after harvest in 2000. Bars indicate standard errors of four replicates.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Fertilizer–15N recovery in Panoche clay loam of microplots labeled either in the soil and root component or the aboveground residue component. Pima cotton was fertilized in spring, and aboveground residue exchanges were made in the fall of 1999. Soil samples were collected after Pima harvest in 2000. Bars indicate standard errors of three replicates.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.