SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 April 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:607-615 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0156
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saavedra, C.
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Saavedra, C.
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Saavedra, C.
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Phosphorus Fractions and Release Patterns in Typical Mediterranean Soils

Concepción Saavedra and Antonio Delgado*

Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales, EUITA, Universidad de Sevilla, Ctra. Utrera Km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Relationship between the combined inorganic P fractions according to Golterman as modified by Díaz-Espejo et al. (1999) and the combined P fractions according to the other two fractionation methods used: Olsen and Sommers (1982), and Ruíz et al. (1997). (b) Relationship between the sum of extracted P in the first three steps in the fractionation method of Ruíz et al. (1997) and the sum of extracted P in the first two step in the modified Golterman fractionation method (Díaz-Espejo et al., 1999).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Olsen P (Olsen et al., 1954) and water-extractable P (WP) as related to P extracted by Ca-EDTA + dithionite (Ca-EDTA-P, Golterman as modified by Díaz-Espejo et al., 1999).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (a) Citrate bicarbonate dithionite P (CBD-P) as related to the amount of Fe extracted in the same fractionation step (CBD-Fe) (Ruíz et al., 1997). (b) The P/Fe mole ratio in CA extracts as related to the ratio CA-Fe/combined Fe fractions.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (a) Relationship between the ratio of P extracted by CA-EDTA + dithionite (Ca-EDTA-P) to the combined of P fractions (Díaz-Espejo et al., 1999) and soil pH. (b) Relationship between the ratio of P extracted by citrate (Cit-P) to the combined P fractions (Ruíz et al., 1997) and soil pH.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. (a) Ratio of P extracted by resins at 1 h (Q1h) to the maximum extractable P (Qmax in the Johnson–Mehl equation) as related to the ratio of P extracted by CA-EDTA + dithionite (Ca-EDTA-P) to the combined of P fractions (Díaz-Espejo et al., 1999) and to (b) the ratio of P extracted by citrate (Cit-P) to the combined P fractions (Ruíz et al., 1997).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.