SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nachabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vomacka, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nachabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vomacka, J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nachabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vomacka, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Water Use
Right arrow Evapotranspiration
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Agroforestry

Evapotranspiration of Two Vegetation Covers in a Shallow Water Table Environment

Mahmood Nachabe*, Nirjhar Shah, Mark Ross and Jeff Vomacka

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, ENB 118, Tampa, FL 33620



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diurnal water table fluctuations in the groundwater discharge area, demonstrating partial water table recovery at night. NGVD, National Geodetic Vertical Datum.

 


View larger version (225K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The EnviroSCAN soil moisture probe being lowered into a PVC access tube.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total soil moisture is estimated in two soil columns. The first is in a groundwater recharge area (pasture), and the second is in a groundwater discharge area (forested). In a groundwater discharge area, subsurface flow acts to replenish the total soil moisture in the column, while this flux depletes the soil moisture in a groundwater recharge area.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Total soil moisture (TSM) versus time in the groundwater discharge area. The subsurface flux is the positive slope of the line between midnight and 0400 h.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Total soil moisture (TSM) versus time in the groundwater recharge area. The slope of the line between midnight and 0400 h is negative and represents the subsurface flux drained from the soil column.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Fluctuations in water table and total soil moisture for 5 d. The elevation of the land surface for this well is 23.21 m above National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Evapotranspiration (ET) estimates for pasture by the pan and total soil moisture (TSM) methods. Data points represent the daily values of ET from both techniques.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Monthly average of evapotranspiration (ET) daily values in forested (diamonds) and pasture (triangles) areas. The gap in the graph represents a period of missing data. Standard deviations of daily values are also shown in the range limits.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.