SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dharmakeerthi, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dharmakeerthi, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, E. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dharmakeerthi, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, E. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity

Factors Contributing to Changes in Plant Available Nitrogen across a Variable Landscape

R. S. Dharmakeerthia, B. D. Kayb,* and E. G. Beauchampb

a Dep. of Soils and Plant Nutrition, Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Dartonfield, Agalawatta, Sri Lanka
b Dep. of Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1



View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Digital elevation map indicating the experimental sites in the 1999 and 2001 seasons (site A) and the 2000 season (site B). The five rows of dots across the slope in a given site indicate the landscape positions (from top to bottom: summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope, and toeslope).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Distribution of rainfall during the growing period in the 1999, 2000, and 2001 seasons. The rainfall data exceeded the y-axis maximum on 6 Sept. 1999 (70.0 mm) and on 19 Aug. 2001 (63.8 mm).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Variation in average daily soil temperatures (°C) at 5- and 20-cm depths in three contrasting landscape positions during first week of July, August, September, and October 2000.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Pattern of plant available N accumulation throughout the 1999, 2000, and 2001 growing seasons in three contrasting landscape positions. The vertical bars indicate the standard error.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship between the seasonal average water-filled pore space (SAWFPS) and organic carbon content ({diamondsuit}) with their regression equations in the 1999, 2000, and 2001 seasons. This also illustrates the distribution of SAWFPS with respect to the lower ({square}) and upper ({circ}) limits of the nonlimiting water range (NLWR) (Drury et al., 2003) in the 1999 and 2000 seasons. Because the textural data for the 2001 season were not available, the NLWR could not be calculated.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.