SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Communar, G.
Right arrow Articles by Keren, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Communar, G.
Right arrow Articles by Keren, R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Communar, G.
Right arrow Articles by Keren, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics

Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Transport of Boron in Soil

G. Communar and R. Keren*

Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, the Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Boron adsorption isotherms for the soil, adjusted to three pH values of the background solution, at a total (CaCl2 + NaCl) concentration of 20 mmolc L–1 and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of 6. Experimental points and calculated lines are presented.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dynamics of the adjustment of the soil columns to the various pHs.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured, predicted and fitted breakthrough curves for B adsorption and desorption on Columns (a) G1, (b) H, and (c) K1 at water flow rates u of 3.6 cm h–1. Dashed lines represent predictions made by using the LE model and the batch-measured isotherm parameters (Table 1) and solid lines were obtained by fitting the LE–NE model to the experimental breakthrough curves (best fit values for f and {gamma}0 are given in Tables 2).

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured and predicted breakthrough curves for the transport of B in columns a) G1, b) H, and c) K1 under pulse injection conditions. Observed data points were taken from Fig. 3. Predictions were made by using the LE-NE model and an average rate coefficient {gamma}0 = 2.85. A pulse durations Tp = 5.85, 6.95, and 8.1 were used to simulate the experimental breakthrough curves from columns G1 (pH 6.9), H (pH 8.3), and K1 (pH 9.3), respectively.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Measured, fitted and predicted breakthrough curves for the transport of B in columns G2, 3 (pH 6.9) and K2, 3 (pH 9.3) at pore water velocity u of 3.6 and 0.16 cm h–1, respectively, under pulse injection conditions (Tp = 0.8). Solid lines represent BTCs obtained by the fitting the LE-NE model to the experimental data (at u = 3.6 cm h–1) ({gamma}0 = 3.5 was obtained) and dashed lines represent predictions of the experimental data (at u = 0.16 cm h–1) by using the LE-NE model and {gamma}0 value of 39.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.