SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leguédois, S.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bissonnais, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leguédois, S.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bissonnais, Y.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leguédois, S.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bissonnais, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Analytical Solutions
Right arrow Experiment Design
Right arrow Soil Physics

Splash Projection Distance for Aggregated Soils

Theory and Experiment

Sophie Leguédoisa,*, Olivier Planchonb, Cédric Legoutc and Yves Le Bissonnaisa

a INRA-Science du sol, B.P. 20619, 45166 Olivet CEDEX, France
b IRD-Lab. BioMCo, Bât. EGER, INRA-INAPG, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
c INRA-UMR INRA/ENSAR Sol, Agronomie & Spatialisation, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes CEDEX, France



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic side view of half of the splash sampler. All measurements are in centimeters and their origin is 0, the center of the device.

 


View larger version (174K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. View of the device used to restrain the rain to the source area.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Velocity distribution of the raindrops.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Integration scheme. Flux coming from the source cup (in gray) of radius R and center B, to point O at distance l from B is integrated over length a by considering the arc AA' of angle ß and radius la.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Radial distribution of the measured flux of splash deposition for four soils. R2 is the coefficient of determination.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Radial distribution of the measured flux of splash deposition for some fractions of (a) the sand and (b) the silt loam. The curves are the fitted equations.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Average splash lengths of the four studied soils as a function of size fraction. Only the values from fits with a determination coefficient > 0.65 and standard error < 20% of the value of {Lambda} were used.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Comparison of the values of average splash lengths from our data under rainfall simulations, and the data of Van Dijk et al. (2003) under natural rainfalls.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Soil surface conditions at the end of the splash experiments for (a) silt loam, (b) silty clay loam, and (c) clay loam.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.