SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel-Issem, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siegel-Issem, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Siegel-Issem, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, S. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Compaction
Right arrow Root Growth
Right arrow Forest Soils

Seedling Root Growth as a Function of Soil Density and Water Content

C. M. Siegel-Issema,*, J. A. Burgera, R. F. Powersb, F. Ponderc and S. C. Pattersond

a Dep. of Forestry (0324), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
b USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave, Redding, CA 96001
c USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Lincoln University, Foster Hall, Room 208, Jefferson City, MO 65102
d MeadWestvaco Corp., Forest Science Lab, Box WV, 180 Westvaco Rd. Summerville, SC 29483



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Soil strength of compacted soil columns as a function of bulk density (Mg m–3) and water content for four forest soils. Each point is the average of three strength measurements. Solid lines indicate that the linear relationship of soil strength as a function of volumetric water content for a particular bulk density level was significant (P = 0.1).

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Soil porosity changes resulting from compaction of four forest soils. Patterned aeration porosity bars denote aeration porosities <10%.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Least limiting water range (LLWR) of several forest soils depicts the field capacity ({theta}FC), wilting point ({theta}WP), aeration porosity < 10% ({theta}AP), and soil strength > 2.0 MPa ({theta}SS) limit lines. Points on the graph represent seedlings grown at certain water contents and bulk densities. Dotted lines extrapolate limits beyond maximum soil bulk densities found in this study.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Root length density of shortleaf pine seedlings, loblolly pine seedlings, and ponderosa pine seedlings grown on (A) Clarksville, (B) Argent, (C) Dome, and (D) Cohasset soils, respectively, as a function of soil bulk density and water content.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.