SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Gehring, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Gehring, R. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Gehring, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Spatial Distribution

Taxonomic and Geographic Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon Pools in Ohio

Zhengxi Tana,*, Rattan Lala, Neil E. Smecka, Frank G. Calhouna, Brian K. Slatera, Bob Parkinsonb and Rich M. Gehringb

a School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210
b USDA-NRCS, 200 N High Street, Columbus, OH 43215



View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs) and magnitudes of soil organic C (SOC) pools estimated using the MLRA-taxonomic approach.

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Taxonomic distribution of soil organic C (SOC) pools estimated using the taxonomic approach and weighted by the area of each land use category within suborders.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Distribution of the cumulative arithmetic mean of soil organic C (SOC) pools for increasing soil depth.

 


View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil organic C pool (SOC) means for three land use categories associated with: (a) soil orders, estimated using taxonomic approach and weighted by the area of each land use within suborders (A, E, H, I, M, and U stand for Alfisols, Entisols, Histosols, Inceptisols, and Ultisols, respectively), and (b) Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs), estimated using the MLRA-taxonomic approach and weighted by the area of each land use within soil orders. The same letters following numbers indicate no significant differences between them at {alpha} = 0.05. {dagger} Actual heights of these bars for Histosols are reduced by a factor of 10 for easy graphing.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationships between the soil organic C (SOC) pools in MLRAs and site variables. Mean values of the SOC pool, drainage class index, and slope percentage were calculated using the MLRA-taxonomic approach. The data of drainage class and slope are from the pedon records in the attribute data table and the areas for area-weighted means are derived from the attribute table associated with the taxon-land use-MLRA theme. Drainage class 0, 1, 2, ...., 6 are assigned for very poorly, poorly, somewhat poorly, moderately well, well, somewhat excessively, and excessively drained, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.