HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Acosta-Martínez, V. Articles by Allen, V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Acosta-Martínez, V. Articles by Allen, V. Agricola Articles by Acosta-Martínez, V. Articles by Allen, V. Related Collections Soil Microbiology Soil Biochemistry Water Conservation

Soil Microbial, Chemical and Physical Properties in Continuous Cotton and Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems

^a USDA-ARS, Plant Stress and Water Conservation Lab., 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415
^b Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409

View larger version (49K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. (A, B) Microbial biomass C and (C, D) N in soils under integrated crop–livestock system and continuous cotton system in November 2002 and July 2003. The bold crop signifies which crop the field is under at the time of the measurements. Similar letter at the same depth indicates no significant treatment differences according to least significant differences (LSD) at P < 0.05.

View larger version (38K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. (A, B) ß-glucosidase and (C, D) ß-glucosaminidase activities in soils under integrated crop–livestock system and continuous cotton system in November 2002 and July 2003. The bold crop signifies which crop the field is under at the time of the measurements. Similar letter at the same depth indicates no significant treatment differences according to least significant differences (LSD) at P < 0.05.

View larger version (45K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Arylsulfatase activity of chloroform fumigated soil, non-fumigated, and fumigated minus non-fumigated soil of the integrated crop-livestock system and continuous cotton system in November 2002 and July 2003. The bold crop signifies which crop the field is under at the time of the measurements. Similar letter at the same depth indicates no significant treatment differences according to least significant differences (LSD) at P < 0.05.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Principal component analyses (PCA) of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of soils under integrated crop–livestock system and continuous cotton system in November 2002 and July 2003.