SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Loughin, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Loughin, T. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Loughin, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Other Geophysical Methods
Right arrow Soil Physics

Simultaneous Measurement of Soil Water Content and Salinity Using a Frequency-Response Method

N. Zhanga,*, G. Fana, K. H. Leea, G. J. Kluitenbergb and T. M. Loughinc

a Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66502
b Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66502
c Dep. of Statistics, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66502



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Four-electrode Wenner array.

 


View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Control of soil sample density.

 


View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The sensor used in the experiment.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Functional diagram of the experimental system.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Frequency responses of the sensor at four volumetric water contents, 0.11 cmol kg–1 salinity, and the 40-mm penetration depth.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Frequency responses of the sensor at four salinities, 0.19 m3 m–3 volumetric water content, and the 40-mm penetration depth.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Frequency responses of the sensor at four penetration depths, 0.29 m3 m–3 volumetric water content, and 1.752 cmol kg–1 salinity.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Actual and predicted volumetric water contents at the 30-mm penetration depth.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Actual and predicted salinities at the 30-mm penetration depth.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Actual and predicted salinities with two replicate frequency-response data collected at the highest salinity (1.752 cmol kg–1) and the lowest water content (0.12 m3 m–3) removed.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Performances of calibration models established for predicting salinity at four fixed volumetric water levels and a fixed penetration depth (30 mm).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. Performances of calibration models established for predicting volumetric water content at four fixed salinity levels and a fixed penetration depth (30 mm).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.